Cargando…
The value of intra-operative electrographic biomarkers for tailoring during epilepsy surgery: from group-level to patient-level analysis
Signal analysis biomarkers, in an intra-operative setting, may be complementary tools to guide and tailor the resection in drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients. Effective assessment of biomarker performances are needed to evaluate their clinical usefulness and translation. We defined a realistic g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7474097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71359-2 |
_version_ | 1783579281746558976 |
---|---|
author | Demuru, Matteo Kalitzin, Stiliyan Zweiphenning, Willemiek van Blooijs, Dorien van’t Klooster, Maryse Van Eijsden, Pieter Leijten, Frans Zijlmans, Maeike |
author_facet | Demuru, Matteo Kalitzin, Stiliyan Zweiphenning, Willemiek van Blooijs, Dorien van’t Klooster, Maryse Van Eijsden, Pieter Leijten, Frans Zijlmans, Maeike |
author_sort | Demuru, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Signal analysis biomarkers, in an intra-operative setting, may be complementary tools to guide and tailor the resection in drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients. Effective assessment of biomarker performances are needed to evaluate their clinical usefulness and translation. We defined a realistic ground-truth scenario and compared the effectiveness of different biomarkers alone and combined to localize epileptogenic tissue during surgery. We investigated the performances of univariate, bivariate and multivariate signal biomarkers applied to 1 min inter-ictal intra-operative electrocorticography to discriminate between epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic locations in 47 drug-resistant people with epilepsy (temporal and extra-temporal) who had been seizure-free one year after the operation. The best result using a single biomarker was obtained using the phase-amplitude coupling measure for which the epileptogenic tissue was localized in 17 out of 47 patients. Combining the whole set of biomarkers provided an improvement of the performances: 27 out of 47 patients. Repeating the analysis only on the temporal-lobe resections we detected the epileptogenic tissue in 29 out of 30 combining all the biomarkers. We suggest that the assessment of biomarker performances on a ground-truth scenario is required to have a proper estimate on how biomarkers translate into clinical use. Phase-amplitude coupling seems the best performing single biomarker and combining biomarkers improves localization of epileptogenic tissue. Performance achieved is not adequate as a tool in the operation theater yet, but it can improve the understanding of pathophysiological process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7474097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74740972020-09-08 The value of intra-operative electrographic biomarkers for tailoring during epilepsy surgery: from group-level to patient-level analysis Demuru, Matteo Kalitzin, Stiliyan Zweiphenning, Willemiek van Blooijs, Dorien van’t Klooster, Maryse Van Eijsden, Pieter Leijten, Frans Zijlmans, Maeike Sci Rep Article Signal analysis biomarkers, in an intra-operative setting, may be complementary tools to guide and tailor the resection in drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients. Effective assessment of biomarker performances are needed to evaluate their clinical usefulness and translation. We defined a realistic ground-truth scenario and compared the effectiveness of different biomarkers alone and combined to localize epileptogenic tissue during surgery. We investigated the performances of univariate, bivariate and multivariate signal biomarkers applied to 1 min inter-ictal intra-operative electrocorticography to discriminate between epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic locations in 47 drug-resistant people with epilepsy (temporal and extra-temporal) who had been seizure-free one year after the operation. The best result using a single biomarker was obtained using the phase-amplitude coupling measure for which the epileptogenic tissue was localized in 17 out of 47 patients. Combining the whole set of biomarkers provided an improvement of the performances: 27 out of 47 patients. Repeating the analysis only on the temporal-lobe resections we detected the epileptogenic tissue in 29 out of 30 combining all the biomarkers. We suggest that the assessment of biomarker performances on a ground-truth scenario is required to have a proper estimate on how biomarkers translate into clinical use. Phase-amplitude coupling seems the best performing single biomarker and combining biomarkers improves localization of epileptogenic tissue. Performance achieved is not adequate as a tool in the operation theater yet, but it can improve the understanding of pathophysiological process. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7474097/ /pubmed/32887896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71359-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Demuru, Matteo Kalitzin, Stiliyan Zweiphenning, Willemiek van Blooijs, Dorien van’t Klooster, Maryse Van Eijsden, Pieter Leijten, Frans Zijlmans, Maeike The value of intra-operative electrographic biomarkers for tailoring during epilepsy surgery: from group-level to patient-level analysis |
title | The value of intra-operative electrographic biomarkers for tailoring during epilepsy surgery: from group-level to patient-level analysis |
title_full | The value of intra-operative electrographic biomarkers for tailoring during epilepsy surgery: from group-level to patient-level analysis |
title_fullStr | The value of intra-operative electrographic biomarkers for tailoring during epilepsy surgery: from group-level to patient-level analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of intra-operative electrographic biomarkers for tailoring during epilepsy surgery: from group-level to patient-level analysis |
title_short | The value of intra-operative electrographic biomarkers for tailoring during epilepsy surgery: from group-level to patient-level analysis |
title_sort | value of intra-operative electrographic biomarkers for tailoring during epilepsy surgery: from group-level to patient-level analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7474097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71359-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demurumatteo thevalueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT kalitzinstiliyan thevalueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT zweiphenningwillemiek thevalueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT vanblooijsdorien thevalueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT vantkloostermaryse thevalueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT vaneijsdenpieter thevalueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT leijtenfrans thevalueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT zijlmansmaeike thevalueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT thevalueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT demurumatteo valueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT kalitzinstiliyan valueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT zweiphenningwillemiek valueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT vanblooijsdorien valueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT vantkloostermaryse valueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT vaneijsdenpieter valueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT leijtenfrans valueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT zijlmansmaeike valueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis AT valueofintraoperativeelectrographicbiomarkersfortailoringduringepilepsysurgeryfromgroupleveltopatientlevelanalysis |