Cargando…
The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: The gold-standard treatment for symptomatic anterior skull base meningiomas is surgical resection. The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach (eSKA) is a promising technique for surgical resection of olfactory groove (OGM) and tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) but has yet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7474310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32889640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04544-x |
_version_ | 1783579312384901120 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Danyal Z. Muskens, Ivo S. Mekary, Rania A. Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H. Helmy, Adel E. Reisch, Robert Broekman, Marike L. D. Marcus, Hani J. |
author_facet | Khan, Danyal Z. Muskens, Ivo S. Mekary, Rania A. Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H. Helmy, Adel E. Reisch, Robert Broekman, Marike L. D. Marcus, Hani J. |
author_sort | Khan, Danyal Z. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The gold-standard treatment for symptomatic anterior skull base meningiomas is surgical resection. The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach (eSKA) is a promising technique for surgical resection of olfactory groove (OGM) and tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) but has yet to be compared with the microscopic transcranial (mTCA) and the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in the context of existing literature. METHODS: An updated study-level meta-analysis on surgical outcomes and complications of OGM and TSM operated with the eSKA, mTCA, and EEA was conducted using random-effect models. RESULTS: A total of 2285 articles were screened, yielding 96 studies (2191 TSM and 1510 OGM patients). In terms of effectiveness, gross total resection incidence was highest in mTCA (89.6% TSM, 91.1% OGM), followed by eSKA (85.2% TSM, 84.9% OGM) and EEA (83.9% TSM, 82.8% OGM). Additionally, the EEA group had the highest incidence of visual improvement (81.9% TSM, 54.6% OGM), followed by eSKA (65.9% TSM, 52.9% OGM) and mTCA (63.9% TSM, 45.7% OGM). However, in terms of safety, the EEA possessed the highest cerebrospinal fluid leak incidence (9.2% TSM, 14.5% OGM), compared with eSKA (2.1% TSM, 1.6% OGM) and mTCA (1.6% TSM, 6.5% OGM). Finally, mortality and intraoperative arterial injury were 1% or lower across all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of diverse study populations, the eSKA appeared not to be associated with increased adverse outcomes when compared with mTCA and EEA and offered comparable effectiveness. Case-selection is paramount in establishing a role for the eSKA in anterior skull base tumours. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-020-04544-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7474310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74743102020-09-08 The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis Khan, Danyal Z. Muskens, Ivo S. Mekary, Rania A. Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H. Helmy, Adel E. Reisch, Robert Broekman, Marike L. D. Marcus, Hani J. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Tumor - Meningioma INTRODUCTION: The gold-standard treatment for symptomatic anterior skull base meningiomas is surgical resection. The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach (eSKA) is a promising technique for surgical resection of olfactory groove (OGM) and tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) but has yet to be compared with the microscopic transcranial (mTCA) and the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in the context of existing literature. METHODS: An updated study-level meta-analysis on surgical outcomes and complications of OGM and TSM operated with the eSKA, mTCA, and EEA was conducted using random-effect models. RESULTS: A total of 2285 articles were screened, yielding 96 studies (2191 TSM and 1510 OGM patients). In terms of effectiveness, gross total resection incidence was highest in mTCA (89.6% TSM, 91.1% OGM), followed by eSKA (85.2% TSM, 84.9% OGM) and EEA (83.9% TSM, 82.8% OGM). Additionally, the EEA group had the highest incidence of visual improvement (81.9% TSM, 54.6% OGM), followed by eSKA (65.9% TSM, 52.9% OGM) and mTCA (63.9% TSM, 45.7% OGM). However, in terms of safety, the EEA possessed the highest cerebrospinal fluid leak incidence (9.2% TSM, 14.5% OGM), compared with eSKA (2.1% TSM, 1.6% OGM) and mTCA (1.6% TSM, 6.5% OGM). Finally, mortality and intraoperative arterial injury were 1% or lower across all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of diverse study populations, the eSKA appeared not to be associated with increased adverse outcomes when compared with mTCA and EEA and offered comparable effectiveness. Case-selection is paramount in establishing a role for the eSKA in anterior skull base tumours. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-020-04544-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Vienna 2020-09-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7474310/ /pubmed/32889640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04544-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article - Tumor - Meningioma Khan, Danyal Z. Muskens, Ivo S. Mekary, Rania A. Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H. Helmy, Adel E. Reisch, Robert Broekman, Marike L. D. Marcus, Hani J. The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis |
title | The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis |
title_full | The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis |
title_short | The endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis |
title_sort | endoscope-assisted supraorbital “keyhole” approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article - Tumor - Meningioma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7474310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32889640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04544-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khandanyalz theendoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT muskensivos theendoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT mekaryraniaa theendoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT zamanipoornajafabadiamirh theendoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT helmyadele theendoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT reischrobert theendoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT broekmanmarikeld theendoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT marcushanij theendoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT khandanyalz endoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT muskensivos endoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT mekaryraniaa endoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT zamanipoornajafabadiamirh endoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT helmyadele endoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT reischrobert endoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT broekmanmarikeld endoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis AT marcushanij endoscopeassistedsupraorbitalkeyholeapproachforanteriorskullbasemeningiomasanupdatedmetaanalysis |