Cargando…

Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology is widely used for geodetic monitoring purposes. However, in cases where a higher risk of receiver damage is expected, geodetic GNSS receivers may be considered too expensive to be used. As an alternative, low-cost GNSS receivers that are cheap, l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamza, Veton, Stopar, Bojan, Ambrožič, Tomaž, Turk, Goran, Sterle, Oskar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7474426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32764406
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164375
_version_ 1783579337864249344
author Hamza, Veton
Stopar, Bojan
Ambrožič, Tomaž
Turk, Goran
Sterle, Oskar
author_facet Hamza, Veton
Stopar, Bojan
Ambrožič, Tomaž
Turk, Goran
Sterle, Oskar
author_sort Hamza, Veton
collection PubMed
description Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology is widely used for geodetic monitoring purposes. However, in cases where a higher risk of receiver damage is expected, geodetic GNSS receivers may be considered too expensive to be used. As an alternative, low-cost GNSS receivers that are cheap, light, and prove to be of adequate quality over short baselines, are considered. The main goal of this research is to evaluate the positional precision of a multi-frequency low-cost instrument, namely, ZED-F9P with u-blox ANN-MB-00 antenna, and to investigate its potential for displacement detection. We determined the positional precision within static survey, and the displacement detection within dynamic survey. In both cases, two baselines were set, with the same rover point equipped with a low-cost GNSS instrument. The base point of the first baseline was observed with a geodetic GNSS instrument, whereas the second baseline was observed with a low-cost GNSS instrument. The results from static survey for both baselines showed comparable results for horizontal components; the precision was on a level of 2 mm or better. For the height component, the results show a better performance of low-cost instruments. This may be a consequence of unknown antenna calibration parameters for low-cost GNSS antenna, while statistically significant coordinates of rover points were obtained from both baselines. The difference was again more significant in the height component. For the displacement detection, a device was used that imposes controlled movements with sub-millimeter accuracy. Results, obtained on a basis of 30-min sessions, show that low-cost GNSS instruments can detect displacements from 10 mm upwards with a high level of reliability. On the other hand, low-cost instruments performed slightly worse as far as accuracy is concerned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7474426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74744262020-09-17 Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes Hamza, Veton Stopar, Bojan Ambrožič, Tomaž Turk, Goran Sterle, Oskar Sensors (Basel) Article Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology is widely used for geodetic monitoring purposes. However, in cases where a higher risk of receiver damage is expected, geodetic GNSS receivers may be considered too expensive to be used. As an alternative, low-cost GNSS receivers that are cheap, light, and prove to be of adequate quality over short baselines, are considered. The main goal of this research is to evaluate the positional precision of a multi-frequency low-cost instrument, namely, ZED-F9P with u-blox ANN-MB-00 antenna, and to investigate its potential for displacement detection. We determined the positional precision within static survey, and the displacement detection within dynamic survey. In both cases, two baselines were set, with the same rover point equipped with a low-cost GNSS instrument. The base point of the first baseline was observed with a geodetic GNSS instrument, whereas the second baseline was observed with a low-cost GNSS instrument. The results from static survey for both baselines showed comparable results for horizontal components; the precision was on a level of 2 mm or better. For the height component, the results show a better performance of low-cost instruments. This may be a consequence of unknown antenna calibration parameters for low-cost GNSS antenna, while statistically significant coordinates of rover points were obtained from both baselines. The difference was again more significant in the height component. For the displacement detection, a device was used that imposes controlled movements with sub-millimeter accuracy. Results, obtained on a basis of 30-min sessions, show that low-cost GNSS instruments can detect displacements from 10 mm upwards with a high level of reliability. On the other hand, low-cost instruments performed slightly worse as far as accuracy is concerned. MDPI 2020-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7474426/ /pubmed/32764406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164375 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hamza, Veton
Stopar, Bojan
Ambrožič, Tomaž
Turk, Goran
Sterle, Oskar
Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes
title Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes
title_full Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes
title_fullStr Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes
title_full_unstemmed Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes
title_short Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes
title_sort testing multi-frequency low-cost gnss receivers for geodetic monitoring purposes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7474426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32764406
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164375
work_keys_str_mv AT hamzaveton testingmultifrequencylowcostgnssreceiversforgeodeticmonitoringpurposes
AT stoparbojan testingmultifrequencylowcostgnssreceiversforgeodeticmonitoringpurposes
AT ambrozictomaz testingmultifrequencylowcostgnssreceiversforgeodeticmonitoringpurposes
AT turkgoran testingmultifrequencylowcostgnssreceiversforgeodeticmonitoringpurposes
AT sterleoskar testingmultifrequencylowcostgnssreceiversforgeodeticmonitoringpurposes