Cargando…
Current methods for stress marker detection in saliva
Stress and stress-related diseases are leading to drastic consequences in private and professional life. Therefore, the need for stress prevention strategies is of personal and economic interest. Especially during the recent period related to covid-19 outbreak and lock-down, an ongoing discussion of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7474833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32957066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113604 |
_version_ | 1783579398185680896 |
---|---|
author | Giacomello, Ginevra Scholten, Andreas Parr, Maria Kristina |
author_facet | Giacomello, Ginevra Scholten, Andreas Parr, Maria Kristina |
author_sort | Giacomello, Ginevra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stress and stress-related diseases are leading to drastic consequences in private and professional life. Therefore, the need for stress prevention strategies is of personal and economic interest. Especially during the recent period related to covid-19 outbreak and lock-down, an ongoing discussion of increasing stress etiology is reported. Biomarker analysis may help to assist diagnosis and classification of stress-related diseases and therefore support therapeutical decisions. Due to its non-invasive sampling, the analysis of saliva has become highly attractive compared to the detection methods in other specimen. This review article summarizes the status of research, innovative approaches, and trends. Scientific literature published since 2011 was excerpted with concentration on the detection of up to seven promising marker substances. Most often reported cortisol represents the currently best evaluated stress marker, while norepinephrine (noradrenaline) or its metabolite 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol is also a quite commonly considered stress marker. Other complementary stress marker candidates are testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfonated analogue DHEA-S, alpha-amylase, secretory immunoglobulin A, and chromogranin A. Several working groups are researching in the field of stress marker detection to develop reliable, fast, and affordable methods. Analytical methods reported mainly focused on immunological and electrochemical as well as chromatographic methods hyphenated to mass spectrometric detection to yield the required detection limits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7474833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74748332020-09-08 Current methods for stress marker detection in saliva Giacomello, Ginevra Scholten, Andreas Parr, Maria Kristina J Pharm Biomed Anal Article Stress and stress-related diseases are leading to drastic consequences in private and professional life. Therefore, the need for stress prevention strategies is of personal and economic interest. Especially during the recent period related to covid-19 outbreak and lock-down, an ongoing discussion of increasing stress etiology is reported. Biomarker analysis may help to assist diagnosis and classification of stress-related diseases and therefore support therapeutical decisions. Due to its non-invasive sampling, the analysis of saliva has become highly attractive compared to the detection methods in other specimen. This review article summarizes the status of research, innovative approaches, and trends. Scientific literature published since 2011 was excerpted with concentration on the detection of up to seven promising marker substances. Most often reported cortisol represents the currently best evaluated stress marker, while norepinephrine (noradrenaline) or its metabolite 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol is also a quite commonly considered stress marker. Other complementary stress marker candidates are testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfonated analogue DHEA-S, alpha-amylase, secretory immunoglobulin A, and chromogranin A. Several working groups are researching in the field of stress marker detection to develop reliable, fast, and affordable methods. Analytical methods reported mainly focused on immunological and electrochemical as well as chromatographic methods hyphenated to mass spectrometric detection to yield the required detection limits. Elsevier B.V. 2020-11-30 2020-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7474833/ /pubmed/32957066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113604 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Giacomello, Ginevra Scholten, Andreas Parr, Maria Kristina Current methods for stress marker detection in saliva |
title | Current methods for stress marker detection in saliva |
title_full | Current methods for stress marker detection in saliva |
title_fullStr | Current methods for stress marker detection in saliva |
title_full_unstemmed | Current methods for stress marker detection in saliva |
title_short | Current methods for stress marker detection in saliva |
title_sort | current methods for stress marker detection in saliva |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7474833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32957066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giacomelloginevra currentmethodsforstressmarkerdetectioninsaliva AT scholtenandreas currentmethodsforstressmarkerdetectioninsaliva AT parrmariakristina currentmethodsforstressmarkerdetectioninsaliva |