Cargando…
The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review
INTRODUCTION: Dental implants have become a standard treatment in the replacement of missing teeth. After tooth extraction and implant placement, resorption of buccal bundle bone can pose a significant complication with often very negative cosmetic impacts. Studies have shown that if the dental root...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32893327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00246-2 |
_version_ | 1783579457928298496 |
---|---|
author | Blaschke, Christian Schwass, Donald R. |
author_facet | Blaschke, Christian Schwass, Donald R. |
author_sort | Blaschke, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Dental implants have become a standard treatment in the replacement of missing teeth. After tooth extraction and implant placement, resorption of buccal bundle bone can pose a significant complication with often very negative cosmetic impacts. Studies have shown that if the dental root remains in the alveolar process, bundle bone resorption is very minimal. However, to date, the deliberate retention of roots to preserve bone has not been routinely used in dental implantology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study aims to collect and evaluate the present knowledge with regard to the socket-shield technique as described by Hurzeler et al. (J Clin Periodontol 37(9):855-62, 2010). A PubMed database search (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) was conducted to identify relevant publication. RESULTS: The initial database search returned 229 results. After screening the abstracts, 13 articles were downloaded and further scrutinised. Twelve studies were found to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: Whilst the socket-shield technique potentially offers promising outcomes, reducing the need for invasive bone grafts around implants in the aesthetic zone, clinical data to support this is very limited. The limited data available is compromised by a lack of well-designed prospective randomised controlled studies. The existing case reports are of very limited scientific value. Retrospective studies exist in limited numbers but are of inconsistent design. At this stage, it is unclear whether the socket-shield technique will provide a stable long-time outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7475165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74751652020-09-18 The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review Blaschke, Christian Schwass, Donald R. Int J Implant Dent Review INTRODUCTION: Dental implants have become a standard treatment in the replacement of missing teeth. After tooth extraction and implant placement, resorption of buccal bundle bone can pose a significant complication with often very negative cosmetic impacts. Studies have shown that if the dental root remains in the alveolar process, bundle bone resorption is very minimal. However, to date, the deliberate retention of roots to preserve bone has not been routinely used in dental implantology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study aims to collect and evaluate the present knowledge with regard to the socket-shield technique as described by Hurzeler et al. (J Clin Periodontol 37(9):855-62, 2010). A PubMed database search (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) was conducted to identify relevant publication. RESULTS: The initial database search returned 229 results. After screening the abstracts, 13 articles were downloaded and further scrutinised. Twelve studies were found to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: Whilst the socket-shield technique potentially offers promising outcomes, reducing the need for invasive bone grafts around implants in the aesthetic zone, clinical data to support this is very limited. The limited data available is compromised by a lack of well-designed prospective randomised controlled studies. The existing case reports are of very limited scientific value. Retrospective studies exist in limited numbers but are of inconsistent design. At this stage, it is unclear whether the socket-shield technique will provide a stable long-time outcome. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7475165/ /pubmed/32893327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00246-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Blaschke, Christian Schwass, Donald R. The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review |
title | The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review |
title_full | The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review |
title_fullStr | The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review |
title_short | The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review |
title_sort | socket-shield technique: a critical literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32893327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00246-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blaschkechristian thesocketshieldtechniqueacriticalliteraturereview AT schwassdonaldr thesocketshieldtechniqueacriticalliteraturereview AT blaschkechristian socketshieldtechniqueacriticalliteraturereview AT schwassdonaldr socketshieldtechniqueacriticalliteraturereview |