Cargando…

Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing

OBJECTIVES: Development of a new generation of stable β alloy, free of aluminum or vanadium and with better biological and mechanical compatibility and evaluate the surface properties of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta after anodization in hydrofluoric acid, followed by deposition of different electro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reis, Bárbara A., Fais, Laiza MG., Ribeiro, Ana L.R., Vaz, Luis G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04762
_version_ 1783579473568858112
author Reis, Bárbara A.
Fais, Laiza MG.
Ribeiro, Ana L.R.
Vaz, Luis G.
author_facet Reis, Bárbara A.
Fais, Laiza MG.
Ribeiro, Ana L.R.
Vaz, Luis G.
author_sort Reis, Bárbara A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Development of a new generation of stable β alloy, free of aluminum or vanadium and with better biological and mechanical compatibility and evaluate the surface properties of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta after anodization in hydrofluoric acid, followed by deposition of different electrolyte concentrations of magnesium particles by micro arc-oxidation treatment. METHODS: Disks were anodized in hydrofluoric acid. After this first anodization, the specimens received the deposition of magnesium using different concentration (8.5% and 12.5%) and times (30s and 60s). The surface morphology was assessed using scanning electron microscopy, and the chemical composition was assessed using energy dispersive x ray spectroscopy. The surface free energy was measured from the contact angle, and the mean roughness was measured using a digital profilometer. RESULTS: Anodization in hydrofluoric acid provided the formation of nanotubes in both alloys, and the best concentration of magnesium considered was 8.5%, as it was the condition where the magnesium was incorporated without covering the morphology of the nanotubes. X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed magnesium incorporation in all conditions. The average roughness was increased in the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta alloy. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that anodizing could be used to deposit magnesium on the surfaces of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta nanotubes, with better results obtained in samples with magnesium concentration in 8.5% and the process favored the roughness in the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7475236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74752362020-09-11 Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing Reis, Bárbara A. Fais, Laiza MG. Ribeiro, Ana L.R. Vaz, Luis G. Heliyon Article OBJECTIVES: Development of a new generation of stable β alloy, free of aluminum or vanadium and with better biological and mechanical compatibility and evaluate the surface properties of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta after anodization in hydrofluoric acid, followed by deposition of different electrolyte concentrations of magnesium particles by micro arc-oxidation treatment. METHODS: Disks were anodized in hydrofluoric acid. After this first anodization, the specimens received the deposition of magnesium using different concentration (8.5% and 12.5%) and times (30s and 60s). The surface morphology was assessed using scanning electron microscopy, and the chemical composition was assessed using energy dispersive x ray spectroscopy. The surface free energy was measured from the contact angle, and the mean roughness was measured using a digital profilometer. RESULTS: Anodization in hydrofluoric acid provided the formation of nanotubes in both alloys, and the best concentration of magnesium considered was 8.5%, as it was the condition where the magnesium was incorporated without covering the morphology of the nanotubes. X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed magnesium incorporation in all conditions. The average roughness was increased in the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta alloy. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that anodizing could be used to deposit magnesium on the surfaces of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta nanotubes, with better results obtained in samples with magnesium concentration in 8.5% and the process favored the roughness in the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta group. Elsevier 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7475236/ /pubmed/32923717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04762 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Reis, Bárbara A.
Fais, Laiza MG.
Ribeiro, Ana L.R.
Vaz, Luis G.
Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title_full Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title_fullStr Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title_short Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title_sort comparison of ti–35nb–7zr–5ta and ti–6al–4v hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04762
work_keys_str_mv AT reisbarbaraa comparisonofti35nb7zr5taandti6al4vhydrofluoricacidmagnesiumdopedsurfacesobtainedbyanodizing
AT faislaizamg comparisonofti35nb7zr5taandti6al4vhydrofluoricacidmagnesiumdopedsurfacesobtainedbyanodizing
AT ribeiroanalr comparisonofti35nb7zr5taandti6al4vhydrofluoricacidmagnesiumdopedsurfacesobtainedbyanodizing
AT vazluisg comparisonofti35nb7zr5taandti6al4vhydrofluoricacidmagnesiumdopedsurfacesobtainedbyanodizing