Cargando…

Which is the optimal management for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with TRG 0 and 1 after R0 resection?

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery currently offers promise as a strategy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, there is limited evidence to guide treatment for TRG 0 and 1 patients with locally advanced GC after R0 resection. This study set out...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Fei, Zhang, Yonglei, Peng, Liangqun, Zhang, Zhandong, Yang, Wei, Chai, Junhui, Zhang, Bin, Ji, Sheqing, Hua, Yawei, Chen, Xiaobing, Luo, Suxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953748
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3986
_version_ 1783579506316935168
author Ma, Fei
Zhang, Yonglei
Peng, Liangqun
Zhang, Zhandong
Yang, Wei
Chai, Junhui
Zhang, Bin
Ji, Sheqing
Hua, Yawei
Chen, Xiaobing
Luo, Suxia
author_facet Ma, Fei
Zhang, Yonglei
Peng, Liangqun
Zhang, Zhandong
Yang, Wei
Chai, Junhui
Zhang, Bin
Ji, Sheqing
Hua, Yawei
Chen, Xiaobing
Luo, Suxia
author_sort Ma, Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery currently offers promise as a strategy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, there is limited evidence to guide treatment for TRG 0 and 1 patients with locally advanced GC after R0 resection. This study set out to explore the optimal management for TRG 0 and 1 patients with locally advanced GC after R0 resection. METHODS: The retrospective data of 154 TRG 0 and 1 patients with locally advanced GC following R0 resection who were treated between January 2012 and December 2018 were collected and analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival rate. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 34.1 (range, 6.6–90.9) months. Six patients (3.9%) were lost during follow-up. Of the 27 patients who experienced relapse, 12 died, including 2 patients who died of non-neoplastic causes. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 71.6% (95% CI: 68.5–79.6) and 82.9% (95% CI: 76.9–86.1) for the whole cohort, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) <5.0 ng/ml after NAC (77.7% vs. 20.1%, P<0.001), distal gastrectomy (91.7% vs. 67.5%, P=0.046) had higher 5-year RFS. Meanwhile, combined resection (55.6% vs. 73.1%, P=0.042), major complications (42.7% vs. 80.50%, P<0.001), and lymph node metastasis (ypN+) (52.0% vs. 83.7%, P<0.001) had lower 5-year RFS. The multivariate analysis showed that CEA level after NAC (HR =2.876, 95% CI: 1.051–7.872, P=0.040), major complications (HR =2.432, 95% CI: 1.062–5.567, P=0.035), and lymph node metastasis (ypN+) (HR =3.183, 95% CI: 1.242–8.161, P=0.016) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: TRG 0 and 1 patients with local GC after R0 resection following NAC had a good prognosis, especially patients with CEA <5.0 ng/mL after NAC, and those without major complications or lymph node metastasis. Monotherapy or no chemotherapy may offer options for treating TRG 0 and 1 patients without adverse prognostic factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7475443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74754432020-09-17 Which is the optimal management for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with TRG 0 and 1 after R0 resection? Ma, Fei Zhang, Yonglei Peng, Liangqun Zhang, Zhandong Yang, Wei Chai, Junhui Zhang, Bin Ji, Sheqing Hua, Yawei Chen, Xiaobing Luo, Suxia Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery currently offers promise as a strategy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, there is limited evidence to guide treatment for TRG 0 and 1 patients with locally advanced GC after R0 resection. This study set out to explore the optimal management for TRG 0 and 1 patients with locally advanced GC after R0 resection. METHODS: The retrospective data of 154 TRG 0 and 1 patients with locally advanced GC following R0 resection who were treated between January 2012 and December 2018 were collected and analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival rate. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 34.1 (range, 6.6–90.9) months. Six patients (3.9%) were lost during follow-up. Of the 27 patients who experienced relapse, 12 died, including 2 patients who died of non-neoplastic causes. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 71.6% (95% CI: 68.5–79.6) and 82.9% (95% CI: 76.9–86.1) for the whole cohort, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) <5.0 ng/ml after NAC (77.7% vs. 20.1%, P<0.001), distal gastrectomy (91.7% vs. 67.5%, P=0.046) had higher 5-year RFS. Meanwhile, combined resection (55.6% vs. 73.1%, P=0.042), major complications (42.7% vs. 80.50%, P<0.001), and lymph node metastasis (ypN+) (52.0% vs. 83.7%, P<0.001) had lower 5-year RFS. The multivariate analysis showed that CEA level after NAC (HR =2.876, 95% CI: 1.051–7.872, P=0.040), major complications (HR =2.432, 95% CI: 1.062–5.567, P=0.035), and lymph node metastasis (ypN+) (HR =3.183, 95% CI: 1.242–8.161, P=0.016) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: TRG 0 and 1 patients with local GC after R0 resection following NAC had a good prognosis, especially patients with CEA <5.0 ng/mL after NAC, and those without major complications or lymph node metastasis. Monotherapy or no chemotherapy may offer options for treating TRG 0 and 1 patients without adverse prognostic factors. AME Publishing Company 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7475443/ /pubmed/32953748 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3986 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ma, Fei
Zhang, Yonglei
Peng, Liangqun
Zhang, Zhandong
Yang, Wei
Chai, Junhui
Zhang, Bin
Ji, Sheqing
Hua, Yawei
Chen, Xiaobing
Luo, Suxia
Which is the optimal management for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with TRG 0 and 1 after R0 resection?
title Which is the optimal management for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with TRG 0 and 1 after R0 resection?
title_full Which is the optimal management for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with TRG 0 and 1 after R0 resection?
title_fullStr Which is the optimal management for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with TRG 0 and 1 after R0 resection?
title_full_unstemmed Which is the optimal management for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with TRG 0 and 1 after R0 resection?
title_short Which is the optimal management for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with TRG 0 and 1 after R0 resection?
title_sort which is the optimal management for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with trg 0 and 1 after r0 resection?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953748
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3986
work_keys_str_mv AT mafei whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection
AT zhangyonglei whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection
AT pengliangqun whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection
AT zhangzhandong whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection
AT yangwei whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection
AT chaijunhui whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection
AT zhangbin whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection
AT jisheqing whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection
AT huayawei whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection
AT chenxiaobing whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection
AT luosuxia whichistheoptimalmanagementforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientswithtrg0and1afterr0resection