Cargando…
Genomic analysis of the prognostic value of colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) and colony-stimulating factor receptors (CSFRs) across 24 solid cancer types
BACKGROUND: The prognostic roles of granulocyte-/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-/GM-CSF) and its receptors (CSFRs) from the genomic perspective remain controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate their prognostic value in multiple cancer types by analyzing omics data. MET...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953794 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5363 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The prognostic roles of granulocyte-/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-/GM-CSF) and its receptors (CSFRs) from the genomic perspective remain controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate their prognostic value in multiple cancer types by analyzing omics data. METHODS: The omics data of G-/GM-CSF and receptors were obtained from the cBioportal database. Cutoff values were determined by X-tile. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan–Meier curves. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and common regulated genes were analyzed using R software and Venny 2.1.0, while enrichment pathway analyses were performed by Metascape. RESULTS: A comprehensive mRNA analysis was performed in 8,565 patients across 24 cancer types. The combination subgroup of CSF2 and its receptors with high expression and favorable prognosis was associated with the activation of immune-related pathways, while the subgroup with unfavorable prognosis was associated with the activation of inflammatory and cellular pathways. As for the combination subgroup of CSF3 and its receptor, the high expression and poor prognosis subgroup was accompanied by the activation of inflammation and signaling transduction pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic value of CSFs and CSFRs are cancer-type dependent. Therefore, personalized risk stratification based on CSF and CSFR pathway should be considered for cancer patients. |
---|