Cargando…

Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars

BACKGROUND: The Nuss procedure temporarily places intrathoracic bars for repair of pectus excavatum (PE). The bars may impact excursion and compliance of the anterior chest wall while in place. Effective chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) require depressing the anterior ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stearns, Joshua D., Twaibu, Jaffalie, Kwaku, Dzifa, Pizziconi, Vincent, Abbas, James, Gotimukul, Ashwini, Jaroszewski, Dawn E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944342
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-702
_version_ 1783579524111269888
author Stearns, Joshua D.
Twaibu, Jaffalie
Kwaku, Dzifa
Pizziconi, Vincent
Abbas, James
Gotimukul, Ashwini
Jaroszewski, Dawn E.
author_facet Stearns, Joshua D.
Twaibu, Jaffalie
Kwaku, Dzifa
Pizziconi, Vincent
Abbas, James
Gotimukul, Ashwini
Jaroszewski, Dawn E.
author_sort Stearns, Joshua D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Nuss procedure temporarily places intrathoracic bars for repair of pectus excavatum (PE). The bars may impact excursion and compliance of the anterior chest wall while in place. Effective chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) require depressing the anterior chest wall enough to compress the heart between sternum and spine. We assessed the force required to perform the American Heart Association’s recommended chest compression depth after Nuss repair. METHODS: A lumped element elastic model was developed to simulate the relationship between chest compression forces and displacement with focus on the amount of force required to achieve a depth of 5 cm in the presence of 1–3 Nuss bars. Literature review was conducted for evidence supporting potential use of active abdominal compressions and decompression (AACD) as an alternative method of CPR. RESULTS: The presence of bars notably lowered compression depth by a minimum of 69% compared to a chest without bar(s). The model also demonstrated a dramatic increase (minimum of 226%) in compressive forces required to achieve recommended 5 cm depth. Literature review suggests AACD could be an alternative CPR in patients with Nuss bar(s). CONCLUSIONS: In our model, Nuss bars limited the ability to perform chest compressions due to increased force required to achieve a 5 cm compression. The greater the number of Nuss bars present the greater the force required. This may prevent effective CPR. Use of active abdominal compressions and decompressions should be studied further as an alternative resuscitation modality for patients after the Nuss procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7475523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74755232020-09-16 Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars Stearns, Joshua D. Twaibu, Jaffalie Kwaku, Dzifa Pizziconi, Vincent Abbas, James Gotimukul, Ashwini Jaroszewski, Dawn E. J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: The Nuss procedure temporarily places intrathoracic bars for repair of pectus excavatum (PE). The bars may impact excursion and compliance of the anterior chest wall while in place. Effective chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) require depressing the anterior chest wall enough to compress the heart between sternum and spine. We assessed the force required to perform the American Heart Association’s recommended chest compression depth after Nuss repair. METHODS: A lumped element elastic model was developed to simulate the relationship between chest compression forces and displacement with focus on the amount of force required to achieve a depth of 5 cm in the presence of 1–3 Nuss bars. Literature review was conducted for evidence supporting potential use of active abdominal compressions and decompression (AACD) as an alternative method of CPR. RESULTS: The presence of bars notably lowered compression depth by a minimum of 69% compared to a chest without bar(s). The model also demonstrated a dramatic increase (minimum of 226%) in compressive forces required to achieve recommended 5 cm depth. Literature review suggests AACD could be an alternative CPR in patients with Nuss bar(s). CONCLUSIONS: In our model, Nuss bars limited the ability to perform chest compressions due to increased force required to achieve a 5 cm compression. The greater the number of Nuss bars present the greater the force required. This may prevent effective CPR. Use of active abdominal compressions and decompressions should be studied further as an alternative resuscitation modality for patients after the Nuss procedure. AME Publishing Company 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7475523/ /pubmed/32944342 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-702 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Stearns, Joshua D.
Twaibu, Jaffalie
Kwaku, Dzifa
Pizziconi, Vincent
Abbas, James
Gotimukul, Ashwini
Jaroszewski, Dawn E.
Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars
title Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars
title_full Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars
title_fullStr Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars
title_short Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars
title_sort efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with nuss bars
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944342
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-702
work_keys_str_mv AT stearnsjoshuad efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars
AT twaibujaffalie efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars
AT kwakudzifa efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars
AT pizziconivincent efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars
AT abbasjames efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars
AT gotimukulashwini efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars
AT jaroszewskidawne efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars