Cargando…
Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars
BACKGROUND: The Nuss procedure temporarily places intrathoracic bars for repair of pectus excavatum (PE). The bars may impact excursion and compliance of the anterior chest wall while in place. Effective chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) require depressing the anterior ch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944342 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-702 |
_version_ | 1783579524111269888 |
---|---|
author | Stearns, Joshua D. Twaibu, Jaffalie Kwaku, Dzifa Pizziconi, Vincent Abbas, James Gotimukul, Ashwini Jaroszewski, Dawn E. |
author_facet | Stearns, Joshua D. Twaibu, Jaffalie Kwaku, Dzifa Pizziconi, Vincent Abbas, James Gotimukul, Ashwini Jaroszewski, Dawn E. |
author_sort | Stearns, Joshua D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Nuss procedure temporarily places intrathoracic bars for repair of pectus excavatum (PE). The bars may impact excursion and compliance of the anterior chest wall while in place. Effective chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) require depressing the anterior chest wall enough to compress the heart between sternum and spine. We assessed the force required to perform the American Heart Association’s recommended chest compression depth after Nuss repair. METHODS: A lumped element elastic model was developed to simulate the relationship between chest compression forces and displacement with focus on the amount of force required to achieve a depth of 5 cm in the presence of 1–3 Nuss bars. Literature review was conducted for evidence supporting potential use of active abdominal compressions and decompression (AACD) as an alternative method of CPR. RESULTS: The presence of bars notably lowered compression depth by a minimum of 69% compared to a chest without bar(s). The model also demonstrated a dramatic increase (minimum of 226%) in compressive forces required to achieve recommended 5 cm depth. Literature review suggests AACD could be an alternative CPR in patients with Nuss bar(s). CONCLUSIONS: In our model, Nuss bars limited the ability to perform chest compressions due to increased force required to achieve a 5 cm compression. The greater the number of Nuss bars present the greater the force required. This may prevent effective CPR. Use of active abdominal compressions and decompressions should be studied further as an alternative resuscitation modality for patients after the Nuss procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7475523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74755232020-09-16 Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars Stearns, Joshua D. Twaibu, Jaffalie Kwaku, Dzifa Pizziconi, Vincent Abbas, James Gotimukul, Ashwini Jaroszewski, Dawn E. J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: The Nuss procedure temporarily places intrathoracic bars for repair of pectus excavatum (PE). The bars may impact excursion and compliance of the anterior chest wall while in place. Effective chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) require depressing the anterior chest wall enough to compress the heart between sternum and spine. We assessed the force required to perform the American Heart Association’s recommended chest compression depth after Nuss repair. METHODS: A lumped element elastic model was developed to simulate the relationship between chest compression forces and displacement with focus on the amount of force required to achieve a depth of 5 cm in the presence of 1–3 Nuss bars. Literature review was conducted for evidence supporting potential use of active abdominal compressions and decompression (AACD) as an alternative method of CPR. RESULTS: The presence of bars notably lowered compression depth by a minimum of 69% compared to a chest without bar(s). The model also demonstrated a dramatic increase (minimum of 226%) in compressive forces required to achieve recommended 5 cm depth. Literature review suggests AACD could be an alternative CPR in patients with Nuss bar(s). CONCLUSIONS: In our model, Nuss bars limited the ability to perform chest compressions due to increased force required to achieve a 5 cm compression. The greater the number of Nuss bars present the greater the force required. This may prevent effective CPR. Use of active abdominal compressions and decompressions should be studied further as an alternative resuscitation modality for patients after the Nuss procedure. AME Publishing Company 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7475523/ /pubmed/32944342 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-702 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stearns, Joshua D. Twaibu, Jaffalie Kwaku, Dzifa Pizziconi, Vincent Abbas, James Gotimukul, Ashwini Jaroszewski, Dawn E. Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars |
title | Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars |
title_full | Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars |
title_short | Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars |
title_sort | efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with nuss bars |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944342 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stearnsjoshuad efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars AT twaibujaffalie efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars AT kwakudzifa efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars AT pizziconivincent efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars AT abbasjames efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars AT gotimukulashwini efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars AT jaroszewskidawne efficacyofstandardchestcompressionsinpatientswithnussbars |