Cargando…

Implementation of a pulmonary thromboembolism prophylaxis program in Chinese lung surgery patients: compliance and effectiveness

BACKGROUND: Most studies on prophylaxis against pulmonary embolism (PE) after lung surgery have come from the West. Whether such prophylactic programs can be successfully developed in China has not been fully studied. METHODS: A prospective observational trial included 581 Chinese patients receiving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Lei, Li, Yuping, Ding, Junrong, Yang, Jian, Jiang, Gening, Sihoe, Alan D. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944343
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-690
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Most studies on prophylaxis against pulmonary embolism (PE) after lung surgery have come from the West. Whether such prophylactic programs can be successfully developed in China has not been fully studied. METHODS: A prospective observational trial included 581 Chinese patients receiving lung resection surgery between August 8 and September 12 of 2017. The Caprini score was assessed on the first postoperative day (POD1). For PE prophylaxis, patients with a low score (0–4, n=55) received early ambulation, and those with a high score (≥5, n=526) received early ambulation combined with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) injection. PE incidence and the compliance with this protocol was recorded. RESULTS: Three patients (0.52%) developed PE and all 3 were in the high-risk group, but LMWH was not given (non-compliance). Within the non-compliance patients (n=275), the incidence of PE was 1.09%, higher than that in the compliance patients (0%). The rate of non-compliance with the program was 47.3% (275/581) in the entire cohort. The factors associated with non-compliance were: extended lobectomy performed (9.2% vs. 1.0%, P<0.001); higher volume of postoperative chest drainages (278 vs. 239 mL, P=0.028). The non-compliance group had longer duration of ICU stay (mean of 1.3 vs. 1.1 days, P<0.001); and longer overall hospital stay (mean of 9.7 vs. 8.5 days, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Developing a PE prophylaxis program for patients receiving lung surgery in China contributed to lowering the risk of PE. Failure of compliance in patients with high risk for PE after lung surgery may be linked to worse outcomes.