Cargando…
The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints
PURPOSE: This study examined the central auditory processing (CAP) assessment results of adults between 45 and 85 years of age with probable pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease – i.e., individuals with subjective memory complaints (SMCs) as compared to those who were not reporting significant levels of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00888 |
_version_ | 1783579563075305472 |
---|---|
author | Jayakody, Dona M. P. Menegola, Holly K. Yiannos, Jessica M. Goodman-Simpson, Jack Friedland, Peter L. Taddei, Kevin Laws, Simon M. Weinborn, Michael Martins, Ralph N. Sohrabi, Hamid R. |
author_facet | Jayakody, Dona M. P. Menegola, Holly K. Yiannos, Jessica M. Goodman-Simpson, Jack Friedland, Peter L. Taddei, Kevin Laws, Simon M. Weinborn, Michael Martins, Ralph N. Sohrabi, Hamid R. |
author_sort | Jayakody, Dona M. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study examined the central auditory processing (CAP) assessment results of adults between 45 and 85 years of age with probable pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease – i.e., individuals with subjective memory complaints (SMCs) as compared to those who were not reporting significant levels of memory complaints (non-SMCs). It was hypothesized that the SMC group would perform significantly poorer on tests of central auditory skills compared to participants with non-SMCs (control group). METHODS: A total of 95 participants were recruited from the larger Western Australia Memory Study and were classified as SMCs (N = 61; 20 males and 41 females, mean age 71.47 ±7.18 years) and non-SMCs (N = 34; 10 males, 24 females, mean age 68.85 ±7.69 years). All participants completed a peripheral hearing assessment, a CAP assessment battery including Dichotic Digits, Duration Pattern Test, Dichotic Sentence Identification, Synthetic Sentence Identification with Ipsilateral Competing Message (SSI-ICM) and the Quick-Speech-in-Noise, and a cognitive screening assessment. RESULTS: The SMCs group performed significantly poorer than the control group on SSI-ICM −10 and −20 dB signal-to-noise conditions. No significant differences were found between the two groups on the peripheral hearing threshold measurements and other CAP assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that individuals with SMCs perform poorly on specific CAP assessments in comparison to the controls. The poor CAP in SMC individuals may result in a higher cost to their finite pool of cognitive resources. The CAP results provide yet another biomarker that supports the hypothesis that SMCs may be a primary indication of neuropathological changes in the brain. Longitudinal follow up of individuals with SMCs, and decreased CAP abilities should inform whether this group is at higher risk of developing dementia as compared to non-SMCs and those SMC individuals without CAP difficulties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7475691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74756912020-09-26 The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints Jayakody, Dona M. P. Menegola, Holly K. Yiannos, Jessica M. Goodman-Simpson, Jack Friedland, Peter L. Taddei, Kevin Laws, Simon M. Weinborn, Michael Martins, Ralph N. Sohrabi, Hamid R. Front Neurosci Neuroscience PURPOSE: This study examined the central auditory processing (CAP) assessment results of adults between 45 and 85 years of age with probable pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease – i.e., individuals with subjective memory complaints (SMCs) as compared to those who were not reporting significant levels of memory complaints (non-SMCs). It was hypothesized that the SMC group would perform significantly poorer on tests of central auditory skills compared to participants with non-SMCs (control group). METHODS: A total of 95 participants were recruited from the larger Western Australia Memory Study and were classified as SMCs (N = 61; 20 males and 41 females, mean age 71.47 ±7.18 years) and non-SMCs (N = 34; 10 males, 24 females, mean age 68.85 ±7.69 years). All participants completed a peripheral hearing assessment, a CAP assessment battery including Dichotic Digits, Duration Pattern Test, Dichotic Sentence Identification, Synthetic Sentence Identification with Ipsilateral Competing Message (SSI-ICM) and the Quick-Speech-in-Noise, and a cognitive screening assessment. RESULTS: The SMCs group performed significantly poorer than the control group on SSI-ICM −10 and −20 dB signal-to-noise conditions. No significant differences were found between the two groups on the peripheral hearing threshold measurements and other CAP assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that individuals with SMCs perform poorly on specific CAP assessments in comparison to the controls. The poor CAP in SMC individuals may result in a higher cost to their finite pool of cognitive resources. The CAP results provide yet another biomarker that supports the hypothesis that SMCs may be a primary indication of neuropathological changes in the brain. Longitudinal follow up of individuals with SMCs, and decreased CAP abilities should inform whether this group is at higher risk of developing dementia as compared to non-SMCs and those SMC individuals without CAP difficulties. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7475691/ /pubmed/32982675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00888 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jayakody, Menegola, Yiannos, Goodman-Simpson, Friedland, Taddei, Laws, Weinborn, Martins and Sohrabi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Jayakody, Dona M. P. Menegola, Holly K. Yiannos, Jessica M. Goodman-Simpson, Jack Friedland, Peter L. Taddei, Kevin Laws, Simon M. Weinborn, Michael Martins, Ralph N. Sohrabi, Hamid R. The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints |
title | The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints |
title_full | The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints |
title_fullStr | The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints |
title_full_unstemmed | The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints |
title_short | The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints |
title_sort | peripheral hearing and central auditory processing skills of individuals with subjective memory complaints |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jayakodydonamp theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT menegolahollyk theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT yiannosjessicam theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT goodmansimpsonjack theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT friedlandpeterl theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT taddeikevin theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT lawssimonm theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT weinbornmichael theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT martinsralphn theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT sohrabihamidr theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT jayakodydonamp peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT menegolahollyk peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT yiannosjessicam peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT goodmansimpsonjack peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT friedlandpeterl peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT taddeikevin peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT lawssimonm peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT weinbornmichael peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT martinsralphn peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints AT sohrabihamidr peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints |