Cargando…

The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints

PURPOSE: This study examined the central auditory processing (CAP) assessment results of adults between 45 and 85 years of age with probable pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease – i.e., individuals with subjective memory complaints (SMCs) as compared to those who were not reporting significant levels of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayakody, Dona M. P., Menegola, Holly K., Yiannos, Jessica M., Goodman-Simpson, Jack, Friedland, Peter L., Taddei, Kevin, Laws, Simon M., Weinborn, Michael, Martins, Ralph N., Sohrabi, Hamid R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982675
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00888
_version_ 1783579563075305472
author Jayakody, Dona M. P.
Menegola, Holly K.
Yiannos, Jessica M.
Goodman-Simpson, Jack
Friedland, Peter L.
Taddei, Kevin
Laws, Simon M.
Weinborn, Michael
Martins, Ralph N.
Sohrabi, Hamid R.
author_facet Jayakody, Dona M. P.
Menegola, Holly K.
Yiannos, Jessica M.
Goodman-Simpson, Jack
Friedland, Peter L.
Taddei, Kevin
Laws, Simon M.
Weinborn, Michael
Martins, Ralph N.
Sohrabi, Hamid R.
author_sort Jayakody, Dona M. P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study examined the central auditory processing (CAP) assessment results of adults between 45 and 85 years of age with probable pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease – i.e., individuals with subjective memory complaints (SMCs) as compared to those who were not reporting significant levels of memory complaints (non-SMCs). It was hypothesized that the SMC group would perform significantly poorer on tests of central auditory skills compared to participants with non-SMCs (control group). METHODS: A total of 95 participants were recruited from the larger Western Australia Memory Study and were classified as SMCs (N = 61; 20 males and 41 females, mean age 71.47 ±7.18 years) and non-SMCs (N = 34; 10 males, 24 females, mean age 68.85 ±7.69 years). All participants completed a peripheral hearing assessment, a CAP assessment battery including Dichotic Digits, Duration Pattern Test, Dichotic Sentence Identification, Synthetic Sentence Identification with Ipsilateral Competing Message (SSI-ICM) and the Quick-Speech-in-Noise, and a cognitive screening assessment. RESULTS: The SMCs group performed significantly poorer than the control group on SSI-ICM −10 and −20 dB signal-to-noise conditions. No significant differences were found between the two groups on the peripheral hearing threshold measurements and other CAP assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that individuals with SMCs perform poorly on specific CAP assessments in comparison to the controls. The poor CAP in SMC individuals may result in a higher cost to their finite pool of cognitive resources. The CAP results provide yet another biomarker that supports the hypothesis that SMCs may be a primary indication of neuropathological changes in the brain. Longitudinal follow up of individuals with SMCs, and decreased CAP abilities should inform whether this group is at higher risk of developing dementia as compared to non-SMCs and those SMC individuals without CAP difficulties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7475691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74756912020-09-26 The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints Jayakody, Dona M. P. Menegola, Holly K. Yiannos, Jessica M. Goodman-Simpson, Jack Friedland, Peter L. Taddei, Kevin Laws, Simon M. Weinborn, Michael Martins, Ralph N. Sohrabi, Hamid R. Front Neurosci Neuroscience PURPOSE: This study examined the central auditory processing (CAP) assessment results of adults between 45 and 85 years of age with probable pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease – i.e., individuals with subjective memory complaints (SMCs) as compared to those who were not reporting significant levels of memory complaints (non-SMCs). It was hypothesized that the SMC group would perform significantly poorer on tests of central auditory skills compared to participants with non-SMCs (control group). METHODS: A total of 95 participants were recruited from the larger Western Australia Memory Study and were classified as SMCs (N = 61; 20 males and 41 females, mean age 71.47 ±7.18 years) and non-SMCs (N = 34; 10 males, 24 females, mean age 68.85 ±7.69 years). All participants completed a peripheral hearing assessment, a CAP assessment battery including Dichotic Digits, Duration Pattern Test, Dichotic Sentence Identification, Synthetic Sentence Identification with Ipsilateral Competing Message (SSI-ICM) and the Quick-Speech-in-Noise, and a cognitive screening assessment. RESULTS: The SMCs group performed significantly poorer than the control group on SSI-ICM −10 and −20 dB signal-to-noise conditions. No significant differences were found between the two groups on the peripheral hearing threshold measurements and other CAP assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that individuals with SMCs perform poorly on specific CAP assessments in comparison to the controls. The poor CAP in SMC individuals may result in a higher cost to their finite pool of cognitive resources. The CAP results provide yet another biomarker that supports the hypothesis that SMCs may be a primary indication of neuropathological changes in the brain. Longitudinal follow up of individuals with SMCs, and decreased CAP abilities should inform whether this group is at higher risk of developing dementia as compared to non-SMCs and those SMC individuals without CAP difficulties. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7475691/ /pubmed/32982675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00888 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jayakody, Menegola, Yiannos, Goodman-Simpson, Friedland, Taddei, Laws, Weinborn, Martins and Sohrabi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Jayakody, Dona M. P.
Menegola, Holly K.
Yiannos, Jessica M.
Goodman-Simpson, Jack
Friedland, Peter L.
Taddei, Kevin
Laws, Simon M.
Weinborn, Michael
Martins, Ralph N.
Sohrabi, Hamid R.
The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints
title The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints
title_full The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints
title_fullStr The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints
title_full_unstemmed The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints
title_short The Peripheral Hearing and Central Auditory Processing Skills of Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints
title_sort peripheral hearing and central auditory processing skills of individuals with subjective memory complaints
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7475691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982675
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00888
work_keys_str_mv AT jayakodydonamp theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT menegolahollyk theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT yiannosjessicam theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT goodmansimpsonjack theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT friedlandpeterl theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT taddeikevin theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT lawssimonm theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT weinbornmichael theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT martinsralphn theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT sohrabihamidr theperipheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT jayakodydonamp peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT menegolahollyk peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT yiannosjessicam peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT goodmansimpsonjack peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT friedlandpeterl peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT taddeikevin peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT lawssimonm peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT weinbornmichael peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT martinsralphn peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints
AT sohrabihamidr peripheralhearingandcentralauditoryprocessingskillsofindividualswithsubjectivememorycomplaints