Cargando…

Epidemiology of male breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Due to its rarity, few studies have characterized the epidemiology of male breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine survival and risk factors for male breast cancer in a large U.S. population. METHODS: In this study, 19,795 male patients with breast cancer were identifie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konduri, Santhi, Singh, Maharaj, Bobustuc, George, Rovin, Richard, Kassam, Amin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32866903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.08.010
_version_ 1783579647323144192
author Konduri, Santhi
Singh, Maharaj
Bobustuc, George
Rovin, Richard
Kassam, Amin
author_facet Konduri, Santhi
Singh, Maharaj
Bobustuc, George
Rovin, Richard
Kassam, Amin
author_sort Konduri, Santhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to its rarity, few studies have characterized the epidemiology of male breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine survival and risk factors for male breast cancer in a large U.S. population. METHODS: In this study, 19,795 male patients with breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004–2014). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and treatments were analyzed by using descriptive statistics. We used multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan Meier analysis. RESULTS: Over 10 years, the incidence of male breast cancer increased from 7.2% to 10.3%, while mortality decreased from 11% to 3.8%. Socioeconomic factors predicting mortality included income medium, and high vs low (HR = 0.78; 0.68), private vs no insurance (HR = 0.73) and the academic research facility vs community cancer center (HR = 0.79). Significant predictors of all-cause mortality included age (HR = 1.04), tumor size (HR = 1.01), hormone receptor expression (HR = 0.8) and cancer stage I vs II, III, and IV at the time of diagnosis (HR = 1.5, 2.7, 4.4, 9.9 respectively). Other predictors of mortality include surgery (HR = 0.4), chemotherapy (HR = 0.8), radiation (HR = 0.8), and hormonal therapy (HR-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors, cancer stage, tumor characteristics (size and grade), and high Charlson-Dayo score contributed to higher mortality among male patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Surgery was most effective, followed by radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy. Patients with positive ER or PR expression demonstrated better survival. Adjusting for socioeconomic factors, biomarker identification and timely, appropriately chosen treatment are likely to reduce the risk for mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7476060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74760602020-09-11 Epidemiology of male breast cancer Konduri, Santhi Singh, Maharaj Bobustuc, George Rovin, Richard Kassam, Amin Breast Original Article BACKGROUND: Due to its rarity, few studies have characterized the epidemiology of male breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine survival and risk factors for male breast cancer in a large U.S. population. METHODS: In this study, 19,795 male patients with breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004–2014). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and treatments were analyzed by using descriptive statistics. We used multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan Meier analysis. RESULTS: Over 10 years, the incidence of male breast cancer increased from 7.2% to 10.3%, while mortality decreased from 11% to 3.8%. Socioeconomic factors predicting mortality included income medium, and high vs low (HR = 0.78; 0.68), private vs no insurance (HR = 0.73) and the academic research facility vs community cancer center (HR = 0.79). Significant predictors of all-cause mortality included age (HR = 1.04), tumor size (HR = 1.01), hormone receptor expression (HR = 0.8) and cancer stage I vs II, III, and IV at the time of diagnosis (HR = 1.5, 2.7, 4.4, 9.9 respectively). Other predictors of mortality include surgery (HR = 0.4), chemotherapy (HR = 0.8), radiation (HR = 0.8), and hormonal therapy (HR-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors, cancer stage, tumor characteristics (size and grade), and high Charlson-Dayo score contributed to higher mortality among male patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Surgery was most effective, followed by radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy. Patients with positive ER or PR expression demonstrated better survival. Adjusting for socioeconomic factors, biomarker identification and timely, appropriately chosen treatment are likely to reduce the risk for mortality. Elsevier 2020-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7476060/ /pubmed/32866903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.08.010 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Konduri, Santhi
Singh, Maharaj
Bobustuc, George
Rovin, Richard
Kassam, Amin
Epidemiology of male breast cancer
title Epidemiology of male breast cancer
title_full Epidemiology of male breast cancer
title_fullStr Epidemiology of male breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology of male breast cancer
title_short Epidemiology of male breast cancer
title_sort epidemiology of male breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32866903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.08.010
work_keys_str_mv AT kondurisanthi epidemiologyofmalebreastcancer
AT singhmaharaj epidemiologyofmalebreastcancer
AT bobustucgeorge epidemiologyofmalebreastcancer
AT rovinrichard epidemiologyofmalebreastcancer
AT kassamamin epidemiologyofmalebreastcancer