Cargando…

Mepitel Film is superior to Biafine cream in managing acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a randomised intra‐patient controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: We previously showed that Mepitel Film decreased the severity of acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients. In the current study, we compared the effect of Mepitel Film and Biafine cream on skin reaction severity in a larger cohort of head and neck cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Jing, Yuan, Ling, Wang, Juan, Li, Shuangshuang, Yao, Mengdi, Wang, Kongcheng, Herst, Patries M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32475079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.397
_version_ 1783579660308709376
author Yan, Jing
Yuan, Ling
Wang, Juan
Li, Shuangshuang
Yao, Mengdi
Wang, Kongcheng
Herst, Patries M.
author_facet Yan, Jing
Yuan, Ling
Wang, Juan
Li, Shuangshuang
Yao, Mengdi
Wang, Kongcheng
Herst, Patries M.
author_sort Yan, Jing
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We previously showed that Mepitel Film decreased the severity of acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients. In the current study, we compared the effect of Mepitel Film and Biafine cream on skin reaction severity in a larger cohort of head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 44 head and neck cancer patients were recruited with 39 patients contributing full data sets for analysis. Patients received a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the bilateral lymph nodes in the neck. Left and right lymph node areas were randomised to either Mepitel Film or Biafine cream, applied prophylactically. Skin reaction severity was measured using Radiation‐Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS) and expanded Radiation Oncology group (RTOG) grades. Skin dose was measured using gafchromic Film. RESULTS: Skin reaction severity (combined RISRAS score) underneath Mepitel Film was decreased by 30% (P < 0.001) and moist desquamation rates by 41% (P < 0.001). Skin dose underneath Mepitel Film and Biafine cream was similar (P = 0.925) and unlikely to have affected skin reaction severity. The vast majority (80%) of patients preferred Mepitel Film over Biafine cream. Negative aspects of Mepitel Film included poor adherence (11/39) and discomfort (16/39) during hot weather and showering and itchy skin underneath Mepitel Film (12/39). CONCLUSIONS: Mepitel Film was superior to Biafine cream in reducing the severity of acute radiation‐induced skin reactions and moist desquamation incidence in our head and neck patient cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7476193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74761932020-09-11 Mepitel Film is superior to Biafine cream in managing acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a randomised intra‐patient controlled clinical trial Yan, Jing Yuan, Ling Wang, Juan Li, Shuangshuang Yao, Mengdi Wang, Kongcheng Herst, Patries M. J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: We previously showed that Mepitel Film decreased the severity of acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients. In the current study, we compared the effect of Mepitel Film and Biafine cream on skin reaction severity in a larger cohort of head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 44 head and neck cancer patients were recruited with 39 patients contributing full data sets for analysis. Patients received a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the bilateral lymph nodes in the neck. Left and right lymph node areas were randomised to either Mepitel Film or Biafine cream, applied prophylactically. Skin reaction severity was measured using Radiation‐Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS) and expanded Radiation Oncology group (RTOG) grades. Skin dose was measured using gafchromic Film. RESULTS: Skin reaction severity (combined RISRAS score) underneath Mepitel Film was decreased by 30% (P < 0.001) and moist desquamation rates by 41% (P < 0.001). Skin dose underneath Mepitel Film and Biafine cream was similar (P = 0.925) and unlikely to have affected skin reaction severity. The vast majority (80%) of patients preferred Mepitel Film over Biafine cream. Negative aspects of Mepitel Film included poor adherence (11/39) and discomfort (16/39) during hot weather and showering and itchy skin underneath Mepitel Film (12/39). CONCLUSIONS: Mepitel Film was superior to Biafine cream in reducing the severity of acute radiation‐induced skin reactions and moist desquamation incidence in our head and neck patient cohort. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-31 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7476193/ /pubmed/32475079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.397 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yan, Jing
Yuan, Ling
Wang, Juan
Li, Shuangshuang
Yao, Mengdi
Wang, Kongcheng
Herst, Patries M.
Mepitel Film is superior to Biafine cream in managing acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a randomised intra‐patient controlled clinical trial
title Mepitel Film is superior to Biafine cream in managing acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a randomised intra‐patient controlled clinical trial
title_full Mepitel Film is superior to Biafine cream in managing acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a randomised intra‐patient controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Mepitel Film is superior to Biafine cream in managing acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a randomised intra‐patient controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Mepitel Film is superior to Biafine cream in managing acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a randomised intra‐patient controlled clinical trial
title_short Mepitel Film is superior to Biafine cream in managing acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a randomised intra‐patient controlled clinical trial
title_sort mepitel film is superior to biafine cream in managing acute radiation‐induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a randomised intra‐patient controlled clinical trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32475079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.397
work_keys_str_mv AT yanjing mepitelfilmissuperiortobiafinecreaminmanagingacuteradiationinducedskinreactionsinheadandneckcancerpatientsarandomisedintrapatientcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT yuanling mepitelfilmissuperiortobiafinecreaminmanagingacuteradiationinducedskinreactionsinheadandneckcancerpatientsarandomisedintrapatientcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT wangjuan mepitelfilmissuperiortobiafinecreaminmanagingacuteradiationinducedskinreactionsinheadandneckcancerpatientsarandomisedintrapatientcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT lishuangshuang mepitelfilmissuperiortobiafinecreaminmanagingacuteradiationinducedskinreactionsinheadandneckcancerpatientsarandomisedintrapatientcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT yaomengdi mepitelfilmissuperiortobiafinecreaminmanagingacuteradiationinducedskinreactionsinheadandneckcancerpatientsarandomisedintrapatientcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT wangkongcheng mepitelfilmissuperiortobiafinecreaminmanagingacuteradiationinducedskinreactionsinheadandneckcancerpatientsarandomisedintrapatientcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT herstpatriesm mepitelfilmissuperiortobiafinecreaminmanagingacuteradiationinducedskinreactionsinheadandneckcancerpatientsarandomisedintrapatientcontrolledclinicaltrial