Cargando…

Development of a tobacco 21 policy assessment tool and state-level analysis in the USA, 2015–2019

OBJECTIVE: Policies raising the minimum legal sales age (MLSA) of tobacco products to 21 are commonly referred to as tobacco 21. This study sought to identify components of tobacco 21 policies and develop an instrument to examine policy language within 16 state laws adopted by July 2019. METHODS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D Dobbs, Page, Chadwick, Ginny, W Ungar, Katherine, M Dunlap, Chris, White, Katherine A, Kelly, Michael CT, K Cheney, Marshall
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31611425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055102
_version_ 1783579672116723712
author D Dobbs, Page
Chadwick, Ginny
W Ungar, Katherine
M Dunlap, Chris
White, Katherine A
Kelly, Michael CT
K Cheney, Marshall
author_facet D Dobbs, Page
Chadwick, Ginny
W Ungar, Katherine
M Dunlap, Chris
White, Katherine A
Kelly, Michael CT
K Cheney, Marshall
author_sort D Dobbs, Page
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Policies raising the minimum legal sales age (MLSA) of tobacco products to 21 are commonly referred to as tobacco 21. This study sought to identify components of tobacco 21 policies and develop an instrument to examine policy language within 16 state laws adopted by July 2019. METHODS: The multistage tool development process began with a review of established literature and existing tobacco 21 policies. In a series of meetings, tobacco control experts identified key policy components used to develop an initial tool. After testing and revisions, the instrument was used to code the existing tobacco 21 state-level policies. Inter-rater reliability (κ=0.70) was measured and discrepancies were discussed until consensus was met. Policy component frequencies were reported by state. RESULTS: While all 16 states raised the MLSA to 21, the laws varied widely. Two laws omitted purchaser identification requirements. Fifteen laws mentioned enforcement would include inspections, but only three provided justification for conducting inspections. All 16 states provided a penalty structure for retailer/clerk violations, but penalties ranged considerably. Fourteen states required a tobacco retail licence, nine renewed annually. Six laws contained a military exemption, five were phased-in and 10 contained purchase, use or possession laws, which penalised youth. Four states introduced or expanded pre-emption of local tobacco control. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument developed is the first to examine policy components within state-level tobacco 21 laws. Policies that include negative components or omit positive components may not effectively prevent retailers from selling to youth, which could result in less effective laws.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7476263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74762632020-09-30 Development of a tobacco 21 policy assessment tool and state-level analysis in the USA, 2015–2019 D Dobbs, Page Chadwick, Ginny W Ungar, Katherine M Dunlap, Chris White, Katherine A Kelly, Michael CT K Cheney, Marshall Tob Control Original Research OBJECTIVE: Policies raising the minimum legal sales age (MLSA) of tobacco products to 21 are commonly referred to as tobacco 21. This study sought to identify components of tobacco 21 policies and develop an instrument to examine policy language within 16 state laws adopted by July 2019. METHODS: The multistage tool development process began with a review of established literature and existing tobacco 21 policies. In a series of meetings, tobacco control experts identified key policy components used to develop an initial tool. After testing and revisions, the instrument was used to code the existing tobacco 21 state-level policies. Inter-rater reliability (κ=0.70) was measured and discrepancies were discussed until consensus was met. Policy component frequencies were reported by state. RESULTS: While all 16 states raised the MLSA to 21, the laws varied widely. Two laws omitted purchaser identification requirements. Fifteen laws mentioned enforcement would include inspections, but only three provided justification for conducting inspections. All 16 states provided a penalty structure for retailer/clerk violations, but penalties ranged considerably. Fourteen states required a tobacco retail licence, nine renewed annually. Six laws contained a military exemption, five were phased-in and 10 contained purchase, use or possession laws, which penalised youth. Four states introduced or expanded pre-emption of local tobacco control. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument developed is the first to examine policy components within state-level tobacco 21 laws. Policies that include negative components or omit positive components may not effectively prevent retailers from selling to youth, which could result in less effective laws. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09 2019-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7476263/ /pubmed/31611425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055102 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
D Dobbs, Page
Chadwick, Ginny
W Ungar, Katherine
M Dunlap, Chris
White, Katherine A
Kelly, Michael CT
K Cheney, Marshall
Development of a tobacco 21 policy assessment tool and state-level analysis in the USA, 2015–2019
title Development of a tobacco 21 policy assessment tool and state-level analysis in the USA, 2015–2019
title_full Development of a tobacco 21 policy assessment tool and state-level analysis in the USA, 2015–2019
title_fullStr Development of a tobacco 21 policy assessment tool and state-level analysis in the USA, 2015–2019
title_full_unstemmed Development of a tobacco 21 policy assessment tool and state-level analysis in the USA, 2015–2019
title_short Development of a tobacco 21 policy assessment tool and state-level analysis in the USA, 2015–2019
title_sort development of a tobacco 21 policy assessment tool and state-level analysis in the usa, 2015–2019
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31611425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055102
work_keys_str_mv AT ddobbspage developmentofatobacco21policyassessmenttoolandstatelevelanalysisintheusa20152019
AT chadwickginny developmentofatobacco21policyassessmenttoolandstatelevelanalysisintheusa20152019
AT wungarkatherine developmentofatobacco21policyassessmenttoolandstatelevelanalysisintheusa20152019
AT mdunlapchris developmentofatobacco21policyassessmenttoolandstatelevelanalysisintheusa20152019
AT whitekatherinea developmentofatobacco21policyassessmenttoolandstatelevelanalysisintheusa20152019
AT kellymichaelct developmentofatobacco21policyassessmenttoolandstatelevelanalysisintheusa20152019
AT kcheneymarshall developmentofatobacco21policyassessmenttoolandstatelevelanalysisintheusa20152019