Cargando…

Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review

OBJECTIVES: A core outcome set (COS) is an agreed standardised minimum collection of outcomes that should be measured and reported in research in a specific area of health. Cochrane systematic reviews (‘reviews’) are rigorous reviews on health-related topics conducted under the auspices of Cochrane....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Williamson, Paula R, de Ávila Oliveira, Ricardo, Clarke, Mike, Gorst, Sarah L, Hughes, Karen, Kirkham, Jamie J, Li, Tianjing, Saldanha, Ian J, Schmitt, Jochen
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:	Health Services Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32895272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036562

Ejemplares similares

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability
por: Saldanha, Ian J., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets
por: Saldanha, Ian J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Citation analysis: a new approach to assess the uptake of core outcome sets
por: Barnes, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using ClinicalTrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
por: Wuytack, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptake
por: Barnes, Karen L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Incorporating patients’ perspectives into the initial stages of core outcome set development: a rapid review of qualitative studies of type 2 diabetes
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reading or listening to review summaries - which method will produce greater understanding of the key outcomes in a cochrane review?
por: Maguire, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of published core outcome sets with outcomes recommended in regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency: cross sectional analysis
por: Saldanha, Ian J, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate meta‐analyses in Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth reviews with multiple binary outcomes
por: Price, Malcolm J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
por: Clarke, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Has the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core outcome set influenced the selection of study outcome measures?
por: Kirkham, Jamie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Representation of published core outcome sets for research in regulatory guidance: protocol
por: Dodd, Susanna, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
por: Zhu, Linlin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A Perspective on Implementation Outcomes and Strategies to Promote the Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccines
por: Pilar, Meagan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Uptake of core outcome sets by clinical trialists publishing in major medical journals: Protocol
por: Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Assessing the impact of a research funder’s recommendation to consider core outcome sets
por: Hughes, Karen L., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health
por: Hughes, Karen L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Validation and application of a core set of patient-relevant outcome domains to assess the effectiveness of multimodal pain therapy (VAPAIN): a study protocol
por: Kaiser, Ulrike, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Using behavioural science to enhance use of core outcome sets in trials: protocol
por: Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evaluating the effects of maternal positions in childbirth: An overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Kibuka, Marion, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
por: Alderdice, Fiona, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Mortality Outcomes in Dermatology: An Exploration of Core Outcome Sets and Cochrane Skin Systematic Reviews
por: Sivesind, Torunn E, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
por: Eshun-Wilson, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Learning from Cochrane systematic reviews: what improvements do these suggest for the design of trials?
por: Pirosca, Stefania, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

A review of the handling of missing longitudinal outcome data in clinical trials
por: Powney, Matthew, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Core outcome sets and systematic reviews
por: Clarke, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Outcome measures in Cochrane reviews and protocols for the prevention and treatment of periodontal disease
por: Lamont, Thomas J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_e6hrdkucn37aevldchfmoiffoe