Cargando…
Evaluation of Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA assays in a clinical lab
BACKGROUND: We report our findings of test performance especially specificity of a fully automated Abbott Architect anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA IgA/IgG in human plasma. METHODS: We used positive cohort of 97 samples from Covid-19 patients or healthcare workers, colle...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32910980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.09.002 |
_version_ | 1783579787047993344 |
---|---|
author | Manalac, Justin Yee, Jennifer Calayag, Kyle Nguyen, Linda Patel, Payal M. Zhou, Daniel Shi, Run-Zhang |
author_facet | Manalac, Justin Yee, Jennifer Calayag, Kyle Nguyen, Linda Patel, Payal M. Zhou, Daniel Shi, Run-Zhang |
author_sort | Manalac, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We report our findings of test performance especially specificity of a fully automated Abbott Architect anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA IgA/IgG in human plasma. METHODS: We used positive cohort of 97 samples from Covid-19 patients or healthcare workers, collected at late time points from symptom onsets. We also included another cohort of 215 samples as negative controls, 78 of which had positive serology test results of other infectious diseases or autoimmunity. Assay specificity was assessed by using a total of 847 anonymized samples which were collected before the Covid-19 pandemic from local patient populations seeking clinical care for rheumatoid diseases, thyroid cancer, and therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: Abbott IgG, Euroimmun IgG/IgA had high precision, demonstrated by both intra- and inter-day CVs of <2%. There was no Abbott or Euroimmun IgG assay cross reactivity in the 78 samples with positive serology of non-SARS-CoV-2 infectious diseases and positive autoimmune antibodies. The Abbott IgG has specificity of 99.6%, while Euroimmun IgG and IgA were as high as 91.5% and 71.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation confirmed high specificity of the Abbott IgG assay, while it was lower for Euroimmun IgG. Euroimmun IgA has suboptimal specificity which may limit its clinical use. Assay sensitivity was high for both Abbott and Euroimmun IgG assays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7476889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74768892020-09-08 Evaluation of Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA assays in a clinical lab Manalac, Justin Yee, Jennifer Calayag, Kyle Nguyen, Linda Patel, Payal M. Zhou, Daniel Shi, Run-Zhang Clin Chim Acta Article BACKGROUND: We report our findings of test performance especially specificity of a fully automated Abbott Architect anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA IgA/IgG in human plasma. METHODS: We used positive cohort of 97 samples from Covid-19 patients or healthcare workers, collected at late time points from symptom onsets. We also included another cohort of 215 samples as negative controls, 78 of which had positive serology test results of other infectious diseases or autoimmunity. Assay specificity was assessed by using a total of 847 anonymized samples which were collected before the Covid-19 pandemic from local patient populations seeking clinical care for rheumatoid diseases, thyroid cancer, and therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: Abbott IgG, Euroimmun IgG/IgA had high precision, demonstrated by both intra- and inter-day CVs of <2%. There was no Abbott or Euroimmun IgG assay cross reactivity in the 78 samples with positive serology of non-SARS-CoV-2 infectious diseases and positive autoimmune antibodies. The Abbott IgG has specificity of 99.6%, while Euroimmun IgG and IgA were as high as 91.5% and 71.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation confirmed high specificity of the Abbott IgG assay, while it was lower for Euroimmun IgG. Euroimmun IgA has suboptimal specificity which may limit its clinical use. Assay sensitivity was high for both Abbott and Euroimmun IgG assays. Elsevier B.V. 2020-11 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7476889/ /pubmed/32910980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.09.002 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Manalac, Justin Yee, Jennifer Calayag, Kyle Nguyen, Linda Patel, Payal M. Zhou, Daniel Shi, Run-Zhang Evaluation of Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA assays in a clinical lab |
title | Evaluation of Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA assays in a clinical lab |
title_full | Evaluation of Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA assays in a clinical lab |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA assays in a clinical lab |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA assays in a clinical lab |
title_short | Evaluation of Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA assays in a clinical lab |
title_sort | evaluation of abbott anti-sars-cov-2 cmia igg and euroimmun elisa igg/iga assays in a clinical lab |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32910980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.09.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manalacjustin evaluationofabbottantisarscov2cmiaiggandeuroimmunelisaiggigaassaysinaclinicallab AT yeejennifer evaluationofabbottantisarscov2cmiaiggandeuroimmunelisaiggigaassaysinaclinicallab AT calayagkyle evaluationofabbottantisarscov2cmiaiggandeuroimmunelisaiggigaassaysinaclinicallab AT nguyenlinda evaluationofabbottantisarscov2cmiaiggandeuroimmunelisaiggigaassaysinaclinicallab AT patelpayalm evaluationofabbottantisarscov2cmiaiggandeuroimmunelisaiggigaassaysinaclinicallab AT zhoudaniel evaluationofabbottantisarscov2cmiaiggandeuroimmunelisaiggigaassaysinaclinicallab AT shirunzhang evaluationofabbottantisarscov2cmiaiggandeuroimmunelisaiggigaassaysinaclinicallab |