Cargando…
Predictive value of quantitative (18)F-FDG-PET radiomics analysis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Radiomics is aimed at image-based tumor phenotyping, enabling application within clinical-decision-support-systems to improve diagnostic accuracy and allow for personalized treatment. The purpose was to identify predictive 18-fluor-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron-emi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7477048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00686-2 |
_version_ | 1783579813119787008 |
---|---|
author | Martens, Roland M. Koopman, Thomas Noij, Daniel P. Pfaehler, Elisabeth Übelhör, Caroline Sharma, Sughandi Vergeer, Marije R. Leemans, C. René Hoekstra, Otto S. Yaqub, Maqsood Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. Heymans, Martijn W. Peeters, Carel F. W. de Bree, Remco de Graaf, Pim Castelijns, Jonas A. Boellaard, Ronald |
author_facet | Martens, Roland M. Koopman, Thomas Noij, Daniel P. Pfaehler, Elisabeth Übelhör, Caroline Sharma, Sughandi Vergeer, Marije R. Leemans, C. René Hoekstra, Otto S. Yaqub, Maqsood Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. Heymans, Martijn W. Peeters, Carel F. W. de Bree, Remco de Graaf, Pim Castelijns, Jonas A. Boellaard, Ronald |
author_sort | Martens, Roland M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Radiomics is aimed at image-based tumor phenotyping, enabling application within clinical-decision-support-systems to improve diagnostic accuracy and allow for personalized treatment. The purpose was to identify predictive 18-fluor-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) radiomic features to predict recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2018, 103 retrospectively (training cohort) and 71 consecutively included patients (validation cohort) underwent (18)F-FDG-PET/CT imaging. The 434 extracted radiomic features were subjected, after redundancy filtering, to a projection resulting in outcome-independent meta-features (factors). Correlations between clinical, first-order (18)F-FDG-PET parameters (e.g., SUVmean), and factors were assessed. Factors were combined with (18)F-FDG-PET and clinical parameters in a multivariable survival regression and validated. A clinically applicable risk-stratification was constructed for patients’ outcome. RESULTS: Based on 124 retained radiomic features from 103 patients, 8 factors were constructed. Recurrence prediction was significantly most accurate by combining HPV-status, SUVmean, SUVpeak, factor 3 (histogram gradient and long-run-low-grey-level-emphasis), factor 4 (volume-difference, coarseness, and grey-level-non-uniformity), and factor 6 (histogram variation coefficient) (CI = 0.645). Distant metastasis prediction was most accurate assessing metabolic-active tumor volume (MATV)(CI = 0.627). Overall survival prediction was most accurate using HPV-status, SUVmean, SUVmax, factor 1 (least-axis-length, non-uniformity, high-dependence-of-high grey-levels), and factor 5 (aspherity, major-axis-length, inversed-compactness and, inversed-flatness) (CI = 0.764). CONCLUSIONS: Combining HPV-status, first-order (18)F-FDG-PET parameters, and complementary radiomic factors was most accurate for time-to-event prediction. Predictive phenotype-specific tumor characteristics and interactions might be captured and retained using radiomic factors, which allows for personalized risk stratification and optimizing personalized cancer care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial NL3946 (NTR4111), local ethics commission reference: Prediction 2013.191 and 2016.498. Registered 7 August 2013, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/3946 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7477048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74770482020-09-18 Predictive value of quantitative (18)F-FDG-PET radiomics analysis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Martens, Roland M. Koopman, Thomas Noij, Daniel P. Pfaehler, Elisabeth Übelhör, Caroline Sharma, Sughandi Vergeer, Marije R. Leemans, C. René Hoekstra, Otto S. Yaqub, Maqsood Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. Heymans, Martijn W. Peeters, Carel F. W. de Bree, Remco de Graaf, Pim Castelijns, Jonas A. Boellaard, Ronald EJNMMI Res Original Research ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Radiomics is aimed at image-based tumor phenotyping, enabling application within clinical-decision-support-systems to improve diagnostic accuracy and allow for personalized treatment. The purpose was to identify predictive 18-fluor-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) radiomic features to predict recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2018, 103 retrospectively (training cohort) and 71 consecutively included patients (validation cohort) underwent (18)F-FDG-PET/CT imaging. The 434 extracted radiomic features were subjected, after redundancy filtering, to a projection resulting in outcome-independent meta-features (factors). Correlations between clinical, first-order (18)F-FDG-PET parameters (e.g., SUVmean), and factors were assessed. Factors were combined with (18)F-FDG-PET and clinical parameters in a multivariable survival regression and validated. A clinically applicable risk-stratification was constructed for patients’ outcome. RESULTS: Based on 124 retained radiomic features from 103 patients, 8 factors were constructed. Recurrence prediction was significantly most accurate by combining HPV-status, SUVmean, SUVpeak, factor 3 (histogram gradient and long-run-low-grey-level-emphasis), factor 4 (volume-difference, coarseness, and grey-level-non-uniformity), and factor 6 (histogram variation coefficient) (CI = 0.645). Distant metastasis prediction was most accurate assessing metabolic-active tumor volume (MATV)(CI = 0.627). Overall survival prediction was most accurate using HPV-status, SUVmean, SUVmax, factor 1 (least-axis-length, non-uniformity, high-dependence-of-high grey-levels), and factor 5 (aspherity, major-axis-length, inversed-compactness and, inversed-flatness) (CI = 0.764). CONCLUSIONS: Combining HPV-status, first-order (18)F-FDG-PET parameters, and complementary radiomic factors was most accurate for time-to-event prediction. Predictive phenotype-specific tumor characteristics and interactions might be captured and retained using radiomic factors, which allows for personalized risk stratification and optimizing personalized cancer care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial NL3946 (NTR4111), local ethics commission reference: Prediction 2013.191 and 2016.498. Registered 7 August 2013, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/3946 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7477048/ /pubmed/32894373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00686-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Martens, Roland M. Koopman, Thomas Noij, Daniel P. Pfaehler, Elisabeth Übelhör, Caroline Sharma, Sughandi Vergeer, Marije R. Leemans, C. René Hoekstra, Otto S. Yaqub, Maqsood Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. Heymans, Martijn W. Peeters, Carel F. W. de Bree, Remco de Graaf, Pim Castelijns, Jonas A. Boellaard, Ronald Predictive value of quantitative (18)F-FDG-PET radiomics analysis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma |
title | Predictive value of quantitative (18)F-FDG-PET radiomics analysis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma |
title_full | Predictive value of quantitative (18)F-FDG-PET radiomics analysis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Predictive value of quantitative (18)F-FDG-PET radiomics analysis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive value of quantitative (18)F-FDG-PET radiomics analysis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma |
title_short | Predictive value of quantitative (18)F-FDG-PET radiomics analysis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma |
title_sort | predictive value of quantitative (18)f-fdg-pet radiomics analysis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7477048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00686-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martensrolandm predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT koopmanthomas predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT noijdanielp predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT pfaehlerelisabeth predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT ubelhorcaroline predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT sharmasughandi predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT vergeermarijer predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT leemanscrene predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT hoekstraottos predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT yaqubmaqsood predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT zwezerijnengerbenj predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT heymansmartijnw predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT peeterscarelfw predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT debreeremco predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT degraafpim predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT castelijnsjonasa predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT boellaardronald predictivevalueofquantitative18ffdgpetradiomicsanalysisinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma |