Cargando…

A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage

Recurrent miscarriage (RM) was recently re-defined by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) as the loss of two or more consecutive pregnancies. Before this, and indeed still in some countries, RM was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. While the inciden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hennessy, Marita, Dennehy, Rebecca, Meaney, Sarah, Devane, Declan, O'Donoghue, Keelin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7477641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005862
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13024.3
_version_ 1783579944124678144
author Hennessy, Marita
Dennehy, Rebecca
Meaney, Sarah
Devane, Declan
O'Donoghue, Keelin
author_facet Hennessy, Marita
Dennehy, Rebecca
Meaney, Sarah
Devane, Declan
O'Donoghue, Keelin
author_sort Hennessy, Marita
collection PubMed
description Recurrent miscarriage (RM) was recently re-defined by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) as the loss of two or more consecutive pregnancies. Before this, and indeed still in some countries, RM was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. While the incidence of RM depends on the definition employed and population studied, it is generally accepted to affect 1-6% of women of reproductive age. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for RM have been published by some professional organisations. While there are CPGs on miscarriage in Ireland, there are none concerning RM specifically. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and describe published CPGs for the management, investigation and/or follow-up of RM within high-income countries. Electronic databases (MEDLINE (Ovid (®); 1946), Embase (®) (Elsevier; 1980), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost; 1994), Web of Science™ (Thomson Reuters), Scopus (Elsevier; 2004), and Open Grey (INIST-CNRS; 2011)), selected guideline repositories, and the websites of professional societies will be searched to identify CPGs, published within the last 20 years, for potential inclusion. Two reviewers will review abstracts and full texts independently against the eligibility criteria. Characteristics and recommendations of included CPGs will be extracted by one reviewer and double-checked by another. Two reviewers will use the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation version 2 (AGREE II) instrument independently to assess the quality of the included CPGs. Narrative synthesis will be conducted to appraise and compare CPGs and their recommendations or guidance therein. The identification, appraisal and description of published CPGs in other high-income countries will be a valuable first step in informing efforts to promote the optimisation and standardisation of RM care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7477641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74776412020-09-30 A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage Hennessy, Marita Dennehy, Rebecca Meaney, Sarah Devane, Declan O'Donoghue, Keelin HRB Open Res Study Protocol Recurrent miscarriage (RM) was recently re-defined by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) as the loss of two or more consecutive pregnancies. Before this, and indeed still in some countries, RM was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. While the incidence of RM depends on the definition employed and population studied, it is generally accepted to affect 1-6% of women of reproductive age. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for RM have been published by some professional organisations. While there are CPGs on miscarriage in Ireland, there are none concerning RM specifically. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and describe published CPGs for the management, investigation and/or follow-up of RM within high-income countries. Electronic databases (MEDLINE (Ovid (®); 1946), Embase (®) (Elsevier; 1980), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost; 1994), Web of Science™ (Thomson Reuters), Scopus (Elsevier; 2004), and Open Grey (INIST-CNRS; 2011)), selected guideline repositories, and the websites of professional societies will be searched to identify CPGs, published within the last 20 years, for potential inclusion. Two reviewers will review abstracts and full texts independently against the eligibility criteria. Characteristics and recommendations of included CPGs will be extracted by one reviewer and double-checked by another. Two reviewers will use the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation version 2 (AGREE II) instrument independently to assess the quality of the included CPGs. Narrative synthesis will be conducted to appraise and compare CPGs and their recommendations or guidance therein. The identification, appraisal and description of published CPGs in other high-income countries will be a valuable first step in informing efforts to promote the optimisation and standardisation of RM care. F1000 Research Limited 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7477641/ /pubmed/33005862 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13024.3 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Hennessy M et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hennessy, Marita
Dennehy, Rebecca
Meaney, Sarah
Devane, Declan
O'Donoghue, Keelin
A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage
title A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage
title_full A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage
title_fullStr A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage
title_full_unstemmed A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage
title_short A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage
title_sort protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7477641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005862
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13024.3
work_keys_str_mv AT hennessymarita aprotocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage
AT dennehyrebecca aprotocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage
AT meaneysarah aprotocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage
AT devanedeclan aprotocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage
AT odonoghuekeelin aprotocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage
AT hennessymarita protocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage
AT dennehyrebecca protocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage
AT meaneysarah protocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage
AT devanedeclan protocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage
AT odonoghuekeelin protocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage