Cargando…
A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage
Recurrent miscarriage (RM) was recently re-defined by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) as the loss of two or more consecutive pregnancies. Before this, and indeed still in some countries, RM was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. While the inciden...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7477641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005862 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13024.3 |
_version_ | 1783579944124678144 |
---|---|
author | Hennessy, Marita Dennehy, Rebecca Meaney, Sarah Devane, Declan O'Donoghue, Keelin |
author_facet | Hennessy, Marita Dennehy, Rebecca Meaney, Sarah Devane, Declan O'Donoghue, Keelin |
author_sort | Hennessy, Marita |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recurrent miscarriage (RM) was recently re-defined by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) as the loss of two or more consecutive pregnancies. Before this, and indeed still in some countries, RM was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. While the incidence of RM depends on the definition employed and population studied, it is generally accepted to affect 1-6% of women of reproductive age. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for RM have been published by some professional organisations. While there are CPGs on miscarriage in Ireland, there are none concerning RM specifically. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and describe published CPGs for the management, investigation and/or follow-up of RM within high-income countries. Electronic databases (MEDLINE (Ovid (®); 1946), Embase (®) (Elsevier; 1980), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost; 1994), Web of Science™ (Thomson Reuters), Scopus (Elsevier; 2004), and Open Grey (INIST-CNRS; 2011)), selected guideline repositories, and the websites of professional societies will be searched to identify CPGs, published within the last 20 years, for potential inclusion. Two reviewers will review abstracts and full texts independently against the eligibility criteria. Characteristics and recommendations of included CPGs will be extracted by one reviewer and double-checked by another. Two reviewers will use the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation version 2 (AGREE II) instrument independently to assess the quality of the included CPGs. Narrative synthesis will be conducted to appraise and compare CPGs and their recommendations or guidance therein. The identification, appraisal and description of published CPGs in other high-income countries will be a valuable first step in informing efforts to promote the optimisation and standardisation of RM care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7477641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74776412020-09-30 A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage Hennessy, Marita Dennehy, Rebecca Meaney, Sarah Devane, Declan O'Donoghue, Keelin HRB Open Res Study Protocol Recurrent miscarriage (RM) was recently re-defined by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) as the loss of two or more consecutive pregnancies. Before this, and indeed still in some countries, RM was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. While the incidence of RM depends on the definition employed and population studied, it is generally accepted to affect 1-6% of women of reproductive age. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for RM have been published by some professional organisations. While there are CPGs on miscarriage in Ireland, there are none concerning RM specifically. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and describe published CPGs for the management, investigation and/or follow-up of RM within high-income countries. Electronic databases (MEDLINE (Ovid (®); 1946), Embase (®) (Elsevier; 1980), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost; 1994), Web of Science™ (Thomson Reuters), Scopus (Elsevier; 2004), and Open Grey (INIST-CNRS; 2011)), selected guideline repositories, and the websites of professional societies will be searched to identify CPGs, published within the last 20 years, for potential inclusion. Two reviewers will review abstracts and full texts independently against the eligibility criteria. Characteristics and recommendations of included CPGs will be extracted by one reviewer and double-checked by another. Two reviewers will use the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation version 2 (AGREE II) instrument independently to assess the quality of the included CPGs. Narrative synthesis will be conducted to appraise and compare CPGs and their recommendations or guidance therein. The identification, appraisal and description of published CPGs in other high-income countries will be a valuable first step in informing efforts to promote the optimisation and standardisation of RM care. F1000 Research Limited 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7477641/ /pubmed/33005862 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13024.3 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Hennessy M et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Hennessy, Marita Dennehy, Rebecca Meaney, Sarah Devane, Declan O'Donoghue, Keelin A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage |
title | A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage |
title_full | A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage |
title_fullStr | A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage |
title_full_unstemmed | A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage |
title_short | A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage |
title_sort | protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7477641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005862 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13024.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hennessymarita aprotocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage AT dennehyrebecca aprotocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage AT meaneysarah aprotocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage AT devanedeclan aprotocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage AT odonoghuekeelin aprotocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage AT hennessymarita protocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage AT dennehyrebecca protocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage AT meaneysarah protocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage AT devanedeclan protocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage AT odonoghuekeelin protocolforasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforrecurrentmiscarriage |