Cargando…

Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies for Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients in Serbia

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on long-term effectiveness and cost effectiveness of treatment sequences for multiple myeloma (MM) is sparse. We used published data and country-specific data to assess the cost effectiveness of four-line treatment sequences for elderly transplant-ineligible patients with MM i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vukićević, Đurđa, Rochau, Ursula, Savić, Aleksandar, Schaffner, Monika, Jevđević, Milica, Stojkov, Igor, Sroczynski, Gaby, Willenbacher, Wolfgang, Jahn, Beate, Siebert, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952707
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0011
_version_ 1783579991541284864
author Vukićević, Đurđa
Rochau, Ursula
Savić, Aleksandar
Schaffner, Monika
Jevđević, Milica
Stojkov, Igor
Sroczynski, Gaby
Willenbacher, Wolfgang
Jahn, Beate
Siebert, Uwe
author_facet Vukićević, Đurđa
Rochau, Ursula
Savić, Aleksandar
Schaffner, Monika
Jevđević, Milica
Stojkov, Igor
Sroczynski, Gaby
Willenbacher, Wolfgang
Jahn, Beate
Siebert, Uwe
author_sort Vukićević, Đurđa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Evidence on long-term effectiveness and cost effectiveness of treatment sequences for multiple myeloma (MM) is sparse. We used published data and country-specific data to assess the cost effectiveness of four-line treatment sequences for elderly transplant-ineligible patients with MM in Serbia. METHOD: We developed a Markov cohort model to compare long-term effectiveness and cost effectiveness of five sequential MM treatment alternatives from the perspective of the national healthcare provider. Effectiveness parameters on progression, mortality and adverse events were extracted from published clinical trials. Costs were based on price lists of the National Health Insurance Fund. We compared life expectancy, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios among alternative courses of action. The model was analyzed over a lifelong time horizon applying a 3% annual discount rate for effectiveness outcomes and costs. Robustness of the model was tested in multiple deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The sequences were defined by the frontline treatment: MPT (melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide), MPV (melphalanprednisone-bortezomib), CTD (cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone), VCD (bortezomib-cyclophosphamidedexamethasone) and BP (bendamustine-prednisone). MPV sequence resulted in the highest remaining life expectancy (4.76 life years). Cost-effectiveness analysis resulted in three non-dominated strategies: MPT, VCD, and MPV sequences, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 35,300 per life-year gained (LYG) for VCD and EUR 47,200/LYG for MPV relative to MPT. CONCLUSION: MPV sequence was the most effective in terms of life expectancy for elderly transplant-ineligible MM patients in Serbia. Bortezomib-based strategies would be recommended for the frontline treatment of patients with MM in Serbia if the willingness-to-pay threshold is around EUR 35,000-60,000/LYG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7478073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74780732020-09-18 Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies for Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients in Serbia Vukićević, Đurđa Rochau, Ursula Savić, Aleksandar Schaffner, Monika Jevđević, Milica Stojkov, Igor Sroczynski, Gaby Willenbacher, Wolfgang Jahn, Beate Siebert, Uwe Zdr Varst Original Scientific Article INTRODUCTION: Evidence on long-term effectiveness and cost effectiveness of treatment sequences for multiple myeloma (MM) is sparse. We used published data and country-specific data to assess the cost effectiveness of four-line treatment sequences for elderly transplant-ineligible patients with MM in Serbia. METHOD: We developed a Markov cohort model to compare long-term effectiveness and cost effectiveness of five sequential MM treatment alternatives from the perspective of the national healthcare provider. Effectiveness parameters on progression, mortality and adverse events were extracted from published clinical trials. Costs were based on price lists of the National Health Insurance Fund. We compared life expectancy, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios among alternative courses of action. The model was analyzed over a lifelong time horizon applying a 3% annual discount rate for effectiveness outcomes and costs. Robustness of the model was tested in multiple deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The sequences were defined by the frontline treatment: MPT (melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide), MPV (melphalanprednisone-bortezomib), CTD (cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone), VCD (bortezomib-cyclophosphamidedexamethasone) and BP (bendamustine-prednisone). MPV sequence resulted in the highest remaining life expectancy (4.76 life years). Cost-effectiveness analysis resulted in three non-dominated strategies: MPT, VCD, and MPV sequences, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 35,300 per life-year gained (LYG) for VCD and EUR 47,200/LYG for MPV relative to MPT. CONCLUSION: MPV sequence was the most effective in terms of life expectancy for elderly transplant-ineligible MM patients in Serbia. Bortezomib-based strategies would be recommended for the frontline treatment of patients with MM in Serbia if the willingness-to-pay threshold is around EUR 35,000-60,000/LYG. Sciendo 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7478073/ /pubmed/32952707 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0011 Text en © 2020 Đurđa Vukićević et al., published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Article
Vukićević, Đurđa
Rochau, Ursula
Savić, Aleksandar
Schaffner, Monika
Jevđević, Milica
Stojkov, Igor
Sroczynski, Gaby
Willenbacher, Wolfgang
Jahn, Beate
Siebert, Uwe
Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies for Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients in Serbia
title Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies for Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients in Serbia
title_full Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies for Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients in Serbia
title_fullStr Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies for Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients in Serbia
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies for Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients in Serbia
title_short Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies for Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients in Serbia
title_sort long-term effectiveness and cost effectiveness of multiple myeloma treatment strategies for elderly transplant-ineligible patients in serbia
topic Original Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952707
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0011
work_keys_str_mv AT vukicevicđurđa longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmultiplemyelomatreatmentstrategiesforelderlytransplantineligiblepatientsinserbia
AT rochauursula longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmultiplemyelomatreatmentstrategiesforelderlytransplantineligiblepatientsinserbia
AT savicaleksandar longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmultiplemyelomatreatmentstrategiesforelderlytransplantineligiblepatientsinserbia
AT schaffnermonika longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmultiplemyelomatreatmentstrategiesforelderlytransplantineligiblepatientsinserbia
AT jevđevicmilica longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmultiplemyelomatreatmentstrategiesforelderlytransplantineligiblepatientsinserbia
AT stojkovigor longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmultiplemyelomatreatmentstrategiesforelderlytransplantineligiblepatientsinserbia
AT sroczynskigaby longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmultiplemyelomatreatmentstrategiesforelderlytransplantineligiblepatientsinserbia
AT willenbacherwolfgang longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmultiplemyelomatreatmentstrategiesforelderlytransplantineligiblepatientsinserbia
AT jahnbeate longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmultiplemyelomatreatmentstrategiesforelderlytransplantineligiblepatientsinserbia
AT siebertuwe longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofmultiplemyelomatreatmentstrategiesforelderlytransplantineligiblepatientsinserbia