Cargando…

Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function

PURPOSE: Early detection and treatment of age-related macular degeneration require a clear understanding of the early progress of the disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether minimal macular ophthalmoscopic changes corresponded to changes in visual function. METHODS: Color macul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Narayanan, Divya, Wallstrom, Garrick, Rodriguez, John, Welch, Donna, Chapin, Matthew, Arrigg, Paul, Patil, Rajkumar, Abelson, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943838
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S260787
_version_ 1783580033741225984
author Narayanan, Divya
Wallstrom, Garrick
Rodriguez, John
Welch, Donna
Chapin, Matthew
Arrigg, Paul
Patil, Rajkumar
Abelson, Mark
author_facet Narayanan, Divya
Wallstrom, Garrick
Rodriguez, John
Welch, Donna
Chapin, Matthew
Arrigg, Paul
Patil, Rajkumar
Abelson, Mark
author_sort Narayanan, Divya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Early detection and treatment of age-related macular degeneration require a clear understanding of the early progress of the disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether minimal macular ophthalmoscopic changes corresponded to changes in visual function. METHODS: Color macular photos from a group of older subjects who were classified as grade 0 on AREDS simplified grading were further evaluated by a retinal specialist using 5x magnification for possible minimal macular anomalies. Group 0-A (N = 15) were defined as subjects with no visible macular anomalies while Group 0-B (N = 19) comprised subjects for whom minimal macular mottling, pigment changes or very small drusen (< 63 µm) were observed in the study eye. All subjects had best VA of 20/25 or better and had no evidence of other retinal diseases in the study eye. All subjects underwent a series of visual function tests such as standard ETDRS VA, low luminance ETDRS VA, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, variable contrast flicker (VCF) sensitivity, and reading speed (words per minute, wpm) using both MNRead and low luminance reading on a tablet. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the mean age between the two groups (74.8 ± 5.2 years for 0-A vs 74.5 ± 4.4 for 0-B, p = 0.82). None of the visual function tests identified any significant difference between the two groups. Mean ETDRS VA was 0.0 ± 0.11 for 0-A subjects and 0.08 ± 0.12 for 0-B (p = 0.063). Mean Pelli-Robson log contrast sensitivity was 1.75 ± 0.29 for 0-A and 1.78 ± 0.17 for the 0-B group (p = 0.73). VCF threshold was 0.47 ± 0.25 for 0-A and 0.43 ± 0.22 for 0-B (p = 0.64). Reading speed using MNRead was 214 ± 47.4 wpm for 0-A and 210 ± 64.7 for 0-B (p = 0.85). Low luminance tablet reading speed was 137 ± 71.8 wpm for 0-A and 151 ± 39.4 (0-B) (p = 0.49). CONCLUSION: A panel of psychophysical tests did not demonstrate significant differences between subjects with and without minimal macular changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7478363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74783632020-09-16 Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function Narayanan, Divya Wallstrom, Garrick Rodriguez, John Welch, Donna Chapin, Matthew Arrigg, Paul Patil, Rajkumar Abelson, Mark Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Early detection and treatment of age-related macular degeneration require a clear understanding of the early progress of the disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether minimal macular ophthalmoscopic changes corresponded to changes in visual function. METHODS: Color macular photos from a group of older subjects who were classified as grade 0 on AREDS simplified grading were further evaluated by a retinal specialist using 5x magnification for possible minimal macular anomalies. Group 0-A (N = 15) were defined as subjects with no visible macular anomalies while Group 0-B (N = 19) comprised subjects for whom minimal macular mottling, pigment changes or very small drusen (< 63 µm) were observed in the study eye. All subjects had best VA of 20/25 or better and had no evidence of other retinal diseases in the study eye. All subjects underwent a series of visual function tests such as standard ETDRS VA, low luminance ETDRS VA, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, variable contrast flicker (VCF) sensitivity, and reading speed (words per minute, wpm) using both MNRead and low luminance reading on a tablet. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the mean age between the two groups (74.8 ± 5.2 years for 0-A vs 74.5 ± 4.4 for 0-B, p = 0.82). None of the visual function tests identified any significant difference between the two groups. Mean ETDRS VA was 0.0 ± 0.11 for 0-A subjects and 0.08 ± 0.12 for 0-B (p = 0.063). Mean Pelli-Robson log contrast sensitivity was 1.75 ± 0.29 for 0-A and 1.78 ± 0.17 for the 0-B group (p = 0.73). VCF threshold was 0.47 ± 0.25 for 0-A and 0.43 ± 0.22 for 0-B (p = 0.64). Reading speed using MNRead was 214 ± 47.4 wpm for 0-A and 210 ± 64.7 for 0-B (p = 0.85). Low luminance tablet reading speed was 137 ± 71.8 wpm for 0-A and 151 ± 39.4 (0-B) (p = 0.49). CONCLUSION: A panel of psychophysical tests did not demonstrate significant differences between subjects with and without minimal macular changes. Dove 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7478363/ /pubmed/32943838 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S260787 Text en © 2020 Narayanan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Narayanan, Divya
Wallstrom, Garrick
Rodriguez, John
Welch, Donna
Chapin, Matthew
Arrigg, Paul
Patil, Rajkumar
Abelson, Mark
Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function
title Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function
title_full Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function
title_fullStr Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function
title_full_unstemmed Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function
title_short Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function
title_sort early ophthalmic changes in macula does not correlate with visual function
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943838
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S260787
work_keys_str_mv AT narayanandivya earlyophthalmicchangesinmaculadoesnotcorrelatewithvisualfunction
AT wallstromgarrick earlyophthalmicchangesinmaculadoesnotcorrelatewithvisualfunction
AT rodriguezjohn earlyophthalmicchangesinmaculadoesnotcorrelatewithvisualfunction
AT welchdonna earlyophthalmicchangesinmaculadoesnotcorrelatewithvisualfunction
AT chapinmatthew earlyophthalmicchangesinmaculadoesnotcorrelatewithvisualfunction
AT arriggpaul earlyophthalmicchangesinmaculadoesnotcorrelatewithvisualfunction
AT patilrajkumar earlyophthalmicchangesinmaculadoesnotcorrelatewithvisualfunction
AT abelsonmark earlyophthalmicchangesinmaculadoesnotcorrelatewithvisualfunction