Cargando…

Post-Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rehabilitation Booklet: A Patient-Based Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Lack of physical therapists has led to increment of self-managed rehabilitations in post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in the forms of booklets or leaflets. PURPOSE: The aim of study is to investigate 1) the acceptance of post-ARCR patients towards an education booklet, and 2)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Congda, Li, Qingyue, Li, Fangqi, Zhang, Yuanhao, Tang, Yiyong, Hou, Jingyi, Yang, Rui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943847
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S263645
_version_ 1783580036339597312
author Zhang, Congda
Li, Qingyue
Li, Fangqi
Zhang, Yuanhao
Tang, Yiyong
Hou, Jingyi
Yang, Rui
author_facet Zhang, Congda
Li, Qingyue
Li, Fangqi
Zhang, Yuanhao
Tang, Yiyong
Hou, Jingyi
Yang, Rui
author_sort Zhang, Congda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lack of physical therapists has led to increment of self-managed rehabilitations in post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in the forms of booklets or leaflets. PURPOSE: The aim of study is to investigate 1) the acceptance of post-ARCR patients towards an education booklet, and 2) whether it could be a timesaving and laborsaving tool to physical therapists. METHODS: An education booklet was established through a systematic review. Patients who underwent ARCR in our hospital were included and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group (27 women, 21 men, mean age=57.06 years old). Patients in the intervention group received educational booklets, and an evaluation was also obtained after they finished reading. Patients’ understanding of the booklet was determined by asking patients to re-enact training presented in the booklet. Then, a therapist blinded to allocations would personally demonstrate training to patients until patients fully understood the protocol. For the control group, the same therapist coached patients until the whole protocol was clearly understood. The coaching time for patients in both groups was recorded. RESULTS: Out of 48 patients, 24 (50%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group, and 21 (87.50%) completed their questionnaire. Out of these 21 patients, 20 (95.24%) rated the booklet as “excellent and easy to read”, and 17 (80.95%) felt that the booklet was helpful. The re-enaction accuracy was for strengthening training and specific training (71.43% and 61.90%, respectively). As compared to the control group, the time of coaching for the patients to fully master the protocol in the intervention group was significantly less (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients highly applauded this booklet, and they cherished the information and support it contained. Nevertheless, the re-enaction accuracy was not high, suggesting that the high level of acceptance does not guarantee full understanding of information sent to patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7478374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74783742020-09-16 Post-Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rehabilitation Booklet: A Patient-Based Evaluation Zhang, Congda Li, Qingyue Li, Fangqi Zhang, Yuanhao Tang, Yiyong Hou, Jingyi Yang, Rui Patient Prefer Adherence Clinical Trial Report BACKGROUND: Lack of physical therapists has led to increment of self-managed rehabilitations in post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in the forms of booklets or leaflets. PURPOSE: The aim of study is to investigate 1) the acceptance of post-ARCR patients towards an education booklet, and 2) whether it could be a timesaving and laborsaving tool to physical therapists. METHODS: An education booklet was established through a systematic review. Patients who underwent ARCR in our hospital were included and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group (27 women, 21 men, mean age=57.06 years old). Patients in the intervention group received educational booklets, and an evaluation was also obtained after they finished reading. Patients’ understanding of the booklet was determined by asking patients to re-enact training presented in the booklet. Then, a therapist blinded to allocations would personally demonstrate training to patients until patients fully understood the protocol. For the control group, the same therapist coached patients until the whole protocol was clearly understood. The coaching time for patients in both groups was recorded. RESULTS: Out of 48 patients, 24 (50%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group, and 21 (87.50%) completed their questionnaire. Out of these 21 patients, 20 (95.24%) rated the booklet as “excellent and easy to read”, and 17 (80.95%) felt that the booklet was helpful. The re-enaction accuracy was for strengthening training and specific training (71.43% and 61.90%, respectively). As compared to the control group, the time of coaching for the patients to fully master the protocol in the intervention group was significantly less (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients highly applauded this booklet, and they cherished the information and support it contained. Nevertheless, the re-enaction accuracy was not high, suggesting that the high level of acceptance does not guarantee full understanding of information sent to patients. Dove 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7478374/ /pubmed/32943847 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S263645 Text en © 2020 Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Zhang, Congda
Li, Qingyue
Li, Fangqi
Zhang, Yuanhao
Tang, Yiyong
Hou, Jingyi
Yang, Rui
Post-Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rehabilitation Booklet: A Patient-Based Evaluation
title Post-Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rehabilitation Booklet: A Patient-Based Evaluation
title_full Post-Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rehabilitation Booklet: A Patient-Based Evaluation
title_fullStr Post-Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rehabilitation Booklet: A Patient-Based Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Post-Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rehabilitation Booklet: A Patient-Based Evaluation
title_short Post-Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rehabilitation Booklet: A Patient-Based Evaluation
title_sort post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair rehabilitation booklet: a patient-based evaluation
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943847
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S263645
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangcongda postarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairrehabilitationbookletapatientbasedevaluation
AT liqingyue postarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairrehabilitationbookletapatientbasedevaluation
AT lifangqi postarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairrehabilitationbookletapatientbasedevaluation
AT zhangyuanhao postarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairrehabilitationbookletapatientbasedevaluation
AT tangyiyong postarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairrehabilitationbookletapatientbasedevaluation
AT houjingyi postarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairrehabilitationbookletapatientbasedevaluation
AT yangrui postarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairrehabilitationbookletapatientbasedevaluation