Cargando…
Impact of supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
BACKGROUND: With the improvement of anesthesia and surgical techniques, supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia (GA) combined with nerve block is gradually applied to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. However, the safety of assist ventilation has not been fully confi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019240 |
_version_ | 1783580087772250112 |
---|---|
author | Xiang, Xiaobing Zhou, Huidan Wu, Yingli Fang, Jun Lian, Yanhong |
author_facet | Xiang, Xiaobing Zhou, Huidan Wu, Yingli Fang, Jun Lian, Yanhong |
author_sort | Xiang, Xiaobing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the improvement of anesthesia and surgical techniques, supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia (GA) combined with nerve block is gradually applied to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. However, the safety of assist ventilation has not been fully confirmed, and a large number of samples should be studied in clinical exploration. METHODS: The subjects included 120 patients, undergoing elective thoracoscopic GA, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, were randomly divided into 3 groups, 40 cases in each group. Group T: received double-lumen bronchial intubation, Group I: received intercostal nerve block using a supraglottic device, Group P: received paravertebral nerve block using a supraglottic device. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, saturation of pulse oximetry and surgical field satisfaction, general anesthetic dosage and recovery time were recorded before induction of GA (T(0)), at the start of the surgical procedure (T(1)), 15 minutes later (T(2)), 30 minutes later (T(3)), and before the end of the surgical procedure (T(4)). Static and dynamic pain rating (NRS) and Ramsay sedation score were recorded 2 hours after surgery (T(5)), 12 hours after surgery (T(6)), 24 hours after surgery (T(7)), time to get out of bed, hospitalization time and cost, patient satisfaction and adverse reactions. RESULTS: There was no significant difference with the surgical visual field of the 3 groups (P > .05). The MAP, HR and SpO(2) of the 3 groups were decreased from T(2) to T(3) compared with T(0)(P < .05). Compared with group T: the total dosage of GA was reduced in group I and group P, the recovery time was shorter, the time to get out of bed was earlier (P < .05), the hospitalization time was shortened, the hospitalization cost was lower, and the patient satisfaction was higher (P < .05). The static and dynamic NRS scores were lower from T(5) to T(7) (P < .05). Ramsay sedation scores were higher (P < .05), and the incidence of adverse reactions was lower (P < .05). Comparison between group I and group P: Dynamic NRS score of group P was lower from T(6) to T(7) (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is safe and feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7478596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74785962020-09-24 Impact of supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery Xiang, Xiaobing Zhou, Huidan Wu, Yingli Fang, Jun Lian, Yanhong Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: With the improvement of anesthesia and surgical techniques, supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia (GA) combined with nerve block is gradually applied to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. However, the safety of assist ventilation has not been fully confirmed, and a large number of samples should be studied in clinical exploration. METHODS: The subjects included 120 patients, undergoing elective thoracoscopic GA, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, were randomly divided into 3 groups, 40 cases in each group. Group T: received double-lumen bronchial intubation, Group I: received intercostal nerve block using a supraglottic device, Group P: received paravertebral nerve block using a supraglottic device. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, saturation of pulse oximetry and surgical field satisfaction, general anesthetic dosage and recovery time were recorded before induction of GA (T(0)), at the start of the surgical procedure (T(1)), 15 minutes later (T(2)), 30 minutes later (T(3)), and before the end of the surgical procedure (T(4)). Static and dynamic pain rating (NRS) and Ramsay sedation score were recorded 2 hours after surgery (T(5)), 12 hours after surgery (T(6)), 24 hours after surgery (T(7)), time to get out of bed, hospitalization time and cost, patient satisfaction and adverse reactions. RESULTS: There was no significant difference with the surgical visual field of the 3 groups (P > .05). The MAP, HR and SpO(2) of the 3 groups were decreased from T(2) to T(3) compared with T(0)(P < .05). Compared with group T: the total dosage of GA was reduced in group I and group P, the recovery time was shorter, the time to get out of bed was earlier (P < .05), the hospitalization time was shortened, the hospitalization cost was lower, and the patient satisfaction was higher (P < .05). The static and dynamic NRS scores were lower from T(5) to T(7) (P < .05). Ramsay sedation scores were higher (P < .05), and the incidence of adverse reactions was lower (P < .05). Comparison between group I and group P: Dynamic NRS score of group P was lower from T(6) to T(7) (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is safe and feasible. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7478596/ /pubmed/32150060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019240 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3300 Xiang, Xiaobing Zhou, Huidan Wu, Yingli Fang, Jun Lian, Yanhong Impact of supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery |
title | Impact of supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery |
title_full | Impact of supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery |
title_fullStr | Impact of supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery |
title_short | Impact of supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery |
title_sort | impact of supraglottic device with assist ventilation under general anesthesia combined with nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery |
topic | 3300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiangxiaobing impactofsupraglotticdevicewithassistventilationundergeneralanesthesiacombinedwithnerveblockinuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgery AT zhouhuidan impactofsupraglotticdevicewithassistventilationundergeneralanesthesiacombinedwithnerveblockinuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgery AT wuyingli impactofsupraglotticdevicewithassistventilationundergeneralanesthesiacombinedwithnerveblockinuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgery AT fangjun impactofsupraglotticdevicewithassistventilationundergeneralanesthesiacombinedwithnerveblockinuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgery AT lianyanhong impactofsupraglotticdevicewithassistventilationundergeneralanesthesiacombinedwithnerveblockinuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgery |