Cargando…

Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective

Laboratory mice are the most frequently used animals in biomedical research. In accordance with guidelines for humane handling, several blood sampling techniques have been established. While the effects of these procedures on blood quality and histological alterations at the sampling site are well s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Neele, Kröger, Mareike, Thümmler, Julia, Tietze, Lisa, Palme, Rupert, Touma, Chadi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32898190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238895
_version_ 1783580099856039936
author Meyer, Neele
Kröger, Mareike
Thümmler, Julia
Tietze, Lisa
Palme, Rupert
Touma, Chadi
author_facet Meyer, Neele
Kröger, Mareike
Thümmler, Julia
Tietze, Lisa
Palme, Rupert
Touma, Chadi
author_sort Meyer, Neele
collection PubMed
description Laboratory mice are the most frequently used animals in biomedical research. In accordance with guidelines for humane handling, several blood sampling techniques have been established. While the effects of these procedures on blood quality and histological alterations at the sampling site are well studied, their impact on the animals’ welfare has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, our study aimed to compare three commonly used blood sampling techniques regarding their effects on different indicators of animal welfare, including physiological and behavioural response stress parameters, including pain measures, home-cage behaviour and nest-building as well as exploratory activity and neophobia. Male C57BL/6J mice were subjected to a single blood collection from either the vena facialis, the retrobulbar sinus or the tail vessel, or were allocated to the respective control treatment. While all blood sampling techniques led to an acute increase in plasma corticosterone levels, the response was strongest in animals that underwent sampling from the vena facialis and the retrobulbar sinus. Similar results were observed when the time-course of adrenocortical activity was monitored via corticosterone metabolites from faecal samples. Blood collection from the vena facialis and the retrobulbar sinus also decreased exploration of novel stimuli, resulted in decreased nest-building activity and induced higher scores in the Mouse Grimace Scale. Moreover, locomotor activity and anxiety-related behaviour were strongly affected after facial vein bleeding. Interestingly, tail vessel bleeding only induced little alterations in the assessed physiological and behavioural parameters. Importantly, the observed effects in all treatment groups were no longer detectable after 24 hours, indicating only short-term impacts. Thus, by also taking the animal’s perspective and comprehensively assessing the severity of the particular sampling procedures, the results of our study contribute to Refinement within the 3R concept and allow researchers to objectively select the most appropriate and welfare-friendly blood sampling technique for a given experiment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7478650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74786502020-09-18 Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective Meyer, Neele Kröger, Mareike Thümmler, Julia Tietze, Lisa Palme, Rupert Touma, Chadi PLoS One Research Article Laboratory mice are the most frequently used animals in biomedical research. In accordance with guidelines for humane handling, several blood sampling techniques have been established. While the effects of these procedures on blood quality and histological alterations at the sampling site are well studied, their impact on the animals’ welfare has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, our study aimed to compare three commonly used blood sampling techniques regarding their effects on different indicators of animal welfare, including physiological and behavioural response stress parameters, including pain measures, home-cage behaviour and nest-building as well as exploratory activity and neophobia. Male C57BL/6J mice were subjected to a single blood collection from either the vena facialis, the retrobulbar sinus or the tail vessel, or were allocated to the respective control treatment. While all blood sampling techniques led to an acute increase in plasma corticosterone levels, the response was strongest in animals that underwent sampling from the vena facialis and the retrobulbar sinus. Similar results were observed when the time-course of adrenocortical activity was monitored via corticosterone metabolites from faecal samples. Blood collection from the vena facialis and the retrobulbar sinus also decreased exploration of novel stimuli, resulted in decreased nest-building activity and induced higher scores in the Mouse Grimace Scale. Moreover, locomotor activity and anxiety-related behaviour were strongly affected after facial vein bleeding. Interestingly, tail vessel bleeding only induced little alterations in the assessed physiological and behavioural parameters. Importantly, the observed effects in all treatment groups were no longer detectable after 24 hours, indicating only short-term impacts. Thus, by also taking the animal’s perspective and comprehensively assessing the severity of the particular sampling procedures, the results of our study contribute to Refinement within the 3R concept and allow researchers to objectively select the most appropriate and welfare-friendly blood sampling technique for a given experiment. Public Library of Science 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7478650/ /pubmed/32898190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238895 Text en © 2020 Meyer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meyer, Neele
Kröger, Mareike
Thümmler, Julia
Tietze, Lisa
Palme, Rupert
Touma, Chadi
Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective
title Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective
title_full Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective
title_fullStr Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective
title_full_unstemmed Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective
title_short Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective
title_sort impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: taking the animal’s perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32898190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238895
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerneele impactofthreecommonlyusedbloodsamplingtechniquesonthewelfareoflaboratorymicetakingtheanimalsperspective
AT krogermareike impactofthreecommonlyusedbloodsamplingtechniquesonthewelfareoflaboratorymicetakingtheanimalsperspective
AT thummlerjulia impactofthreecommonlyusedbloodsamplingtechniquesonthewelfareoflaboratorymicetakingtheanimalsperspective
AT tietzelisa impactofthreecommonlyusedbloodsamplingtechniquesonthewelfareoflaboratorymicetakingtheanimalsperspective
AT palmerupert impactofthreecommonlyusedbloodsamplingtechniquesonthewelfareoflaboratorymicetakingtheanimalsperspective
AT toumachadi impactofthreecommonlyusedbloodsamplingtechniquesonthewelfareoflaboratorymicetakingtheanimalsperspective