Cargando…

The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions

BACKGROUND: The classification criteria and staging groups for nasopharyngeal carcinoma described in the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system have been revised over time. This study assessed the proportion of patients whose staging and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Si-Qi, Mao, Yan-Ping, Xu, Cheng, Guo, Rui, Li, Wen-Fei, Tang, Ling-Long, Sun, Ying, Ma, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32810045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000978
_version_ 1783580105722822656
author Tang, Si-Qi
Mao, Yan-Ping
Xu, Cheng
Guo, Rui
Li, Wen-Fei
Tang, Ling-Long
Sun, Ying
Ma, Jun
author_facet Tang, Si-Qi
Mao, Yan-Ping
Xu, Cheng
Guo, Rui
Li, Wen-Fei
Tang, Ling-Long
Sun, Ying
Ma, Jun
author_sort Tang, Si-Qi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The classification criteria and staging groups for nasopharyngeal carcinoma described in the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system have been revised over time. This study assessed the proportion of patients whose staging and treatment strategy have changed due to revisions of the UICC/AJCC staging system over the past 10 years (ie, from the sixth edition to the eighth edition), to provide information for further refinement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1901 patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in our cancer center between November 2009 and June 2012. The Akaike information criterion and Harrell concordance index were applied to evaluate the performance of the staging system. RESULTS: In total, 25 (1.3%) of the 1901 patients who were staged as T2a according to the sixth edition system were downgraded to T1 in the eighth edition; 430 (22.6%) staged as N0 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N1 in the eighth edition; 106 (5.6%) staged as N1/2 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N3 in the eighth edition. In addition, 51 (2.7%) and 25 (1.3%) of the study population were upstaged from stage I to stage II and stage II to stage IVa, respectively; 10 (0.5%) was downgraded from stage II to stage I. The survival curves of adjacent N categories and staging groups defined by eighth classification system were well-separated. However, there was no significant difference in the locoregional failure-free survival (P = 0.730) and disease-free survival (P = 0.690) rates between the T2 and T3 categories in the eighth edition classification system. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to the tumor-node-metastasis staging system over the past 10 years have resulted in N classification changes in numerous cases. Although the eighth edition tumor-node-metastasis staging system better predicts survival outcomes, the T classification could be simplified in future revisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7478675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74786752020-09-24 The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions Tang, Si-Qi Mao, Yan-Ping Xu, Cheng Guo, Rui Li, Wen-Fei Tang, Ling-Long Sun, Ying Ma, Jun Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: The classification criteria and staging groups for nasopharyngeal carcinoma described in the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system have been revised over time. This study assessed the proportion of patients whose staging and treatment strategy have changed due to revisions of the UICC/AJCC staging system over the past 10 years (ie, from the sixth edition to the eighth edition), to provide information for further refinement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1901 patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in our cancer center between November 2009 and June 2012. The Akaike information criterion and Harrell concordance index were applied to evaluate the performance of the staging system. RESULTS: In total, 25 (1.3%) of the 1901 patients who were staged as T2a according to the sixth edition system were downgraded to T1 in the eighth edition; 430 (22.6%) staged as N0 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N1 in the eighth edition; 106 (5.6%) staged as N1/2 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N3 in the eighth edition. In addition, 51 (2.7%) and 25 (1.3%) of the study population were upstaged from stage I to stage II and stage II to stage IVa, respectively; 10 (0.5%) was downgraded from stage II to stage I. The survival curves of adjacent N categories and staging groups defined by eighth classification system were well-separated. However, there was no significant difference in the locoregional failure-free survival (P = 0.730) and disease-free survival (P = 0.690) rates between the T2 and T3 categories in the eighth edition classification system. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to the tumor-node-metastasis staging system over the past 10 years have resulted in N classification changes in numerous cases. Although the eighth edition tumor-node-metastasis staging system better predicts survival outcomes, the T classification could be simplified in future revisions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09-05 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7478675/ /pubmed/32810045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000978 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tang, Si-Qi
Mao, Yan-Ping
Xu, Cheng
Guo, Rui
Li, Wen-Fei
Tang, Ling-Long
Sun, Ying
Ma, Jun
The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions
title The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions
title_full The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions
title_fullStr The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions
title_short The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions
title_sort evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32810045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000978
work_keys_str_mv AT tangsiqi theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT maoyanping theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT xucheng theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT guorui theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT liwenfei theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT tanglinglong theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT sunying theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT majun theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT tangsiqi evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT maoyanping evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT xucheng evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT guorui evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT liwenfei evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT tanglinglong evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT sunying evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions
AT majun evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions