Cargando…
The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions
BACKGROUND: The classification criteria and staging groups for nasopharyngeal carcinoma described in the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system have been revised over time. This study assessed the proportion of patients whose staging and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32810045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000978 |
_version_ | 1783580105722822656 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Si-Qi Mao, Yan-Ping Xu, Cheng Guo, Rui Li, Wen-Fei Tang, Ling-Long Sun, Ying Ma, Jun |
author_facet | Tang, Si-Qi Mao, Yan-Ping Xu, Cheng Guo, Rui Li, Wen-Fei Tang, Ling-Long Sun, Ying Ma, Jun |
author_sort | Tang, Si-Qi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The classification criteria and staging groups for nasopharyngeal carcinoma described in the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system have been revised over time. This study assessed the proportion of patients whose staging and treatment strategy have changed due to revisions of the UICC/AJCC staging system over the past 10 years (ie, from the sixth edition to the eighth edition), to provide information for further refinement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1901 patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in our cancer center between November 2009 and June 2012. The Akaike information criterion and Harrell concordance index were applied to evaluate the performance of the staging system. RESULTS: In total, 25 (1.3%) of the 1901 patients who were staged as T2a according to the sixth edition system were downgraded to T1 in the eighth edition; 430 (22.6%) staged as N0 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N1 in the eighth edition; 106 (5.6%) staged as N1/2 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N3 in the eighth edition. In addition, 51 (2.7%) and 25 (1.3%) of the study population were upstaged from stage I to stage II and stage II to stage IVa, respectively; 10 (0.5%) was downgraded from stage II to stage I. The survival curves of adjacent N categories and staging groups defined by eighth classification system were well-separated. However, there was no significant difference in the locoregional failure-free survival (P = 0.730) and disease-free survival (P = 0.690) rates between the T2 and T3 categories in the eighth edition classification system. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to the tumor-node-metastasis staging system over the past 10 years have resulted in N classification changes in numerous cases. Although the eighth edition tumor-node-metastasis staging system better predicts survival outcomes, the T classification could be simplified in future revisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7478675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74786752020-09-24 The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions Tang, Si-Qi Mao, Yan-Ping Xu, Cheng Guo, Rui Li, Wen-Fei Tang, Ling-Long Sun, Ying Ma, Jun Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: The classification criteria and staging groups for nasopharyngeal carcinoma described in the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system have been revised over time. This study assessed the proportion of patients whose staging and treatment strategy have changed due to revisions of the UICC/AJCC staging system over the past 10 years (ie, from the sixth edition to the eighth edition), to provide information for further refinement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1901 patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in our cancer center between November 2009 and June 2012. The Akaike information criterion and Harrell concordance index were applied to evaluate the performance of the staging system. RESULTS: In total, 25 (1.3%) of the 1901 patients who were staged as T2a according to the sixth edition system were downgraded to T1 in the eighth edition; 430 (22.6%) staged as N0 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N1 in the eighth edition; 106 (5.6%) staged as N1/2 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N3 in the eighth edition. In addition, 51 (2.7%) and 25 (1.3%) of the study population were upstaged from stage I to stage II and stage II to stage IVa, respectively; 10 (0.5%) was downgraded from stage II to stage I. The survival curves of adjacent N categories and staging groups defined by eighth classification system were well-separated. However, there was no significant difference in the locoregional failure-free survival (P = 0.730) and disease-free survival (P = 0.690) rates between the T2 and T3 categories in the eighth edition classification system. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to the tumor-node-metastasis staging system over the past 10 years have resulted in N classification changes in numerous cases. Although the eighth edition tumor-node-metastasis staging system better predicts survival outcomes, the T classification could be simplified in future revisions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09-05 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7478675/ /pubmed/32810045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000978 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tang, Si-Qi Mao, Yan-Ping Xu, Cheng Guo, Rui Li, Wen-Fei Tang, Ling-Long Sun, Ying Ma, Jun The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions |
title | The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions |
title_full | The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions |
title_fullStr | The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions |
title_full_unstemmed | The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions |
title_short | The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions |
title_sort | evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32810045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangsiqi theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT maoyanping theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT xucheng theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT guorui theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT liwenfei theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT tanglinglong theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT sunying theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT majun theevolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT tangsiqi evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT maoyanping evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT xucheng evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT guorui evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT liwenfei evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT tanglinglong evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT sunying evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions AT majun evolutionofthenasopharyngealcarcinomastagingsystemovera10yearperiodimplicationsforfuturerevisions |