Cargando…

The value of apolipoprotein E in distinguishing benign and malignant unilateral pleural effusions

Pleural effusion (PE) remains insurmountable challenge and public health problem, requiring novel noninvasive biomarkers for accurate diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of apolipoprotein E (Apo-E) in PE, in order to determine its potential use as a diagnostic bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Qing, Fang, Guiju, Deng, Xinyu, Zhang, Canhui, Liu, Zhixin, Peng, Zhiwen, Lai, Zibiao, Peng, Yunjuan, Wu, Jianhui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019320
_version_ 1783580146400231424
author Xue, Qing
Fang, Guiju
Deng, Xinyu
Zhang, Canhui
Liu, Zhixin
Peng, Zhiwen
Lai, Zibiao
Peng, Yunjuan
Wu, Jianhui
author_facet Xue, Qing
Fang, Guiju
Deng, Xinyu
Zhang, Canhui
Liu, Zhixin
Peng, Zhiwen
Lai, Zibiao
Peng, Yunjuan
Wu, Jianhui
author_sort Xue, Qing
collection PubMed
description Pleural effusion (PE) remains insurmountable challenge and public health problem, requiring novel noninvasive biomarkers for accurate diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of apolipoprotein E (Apo-E) in PE, in order to determine its potential use as a diagnostic biomarker for malignant PE (MPE). PE samples were obtained from 127 patients and the etiology of PE was determined by multiple diagnostic techniques. Apo-E levels were then measured in the pleural fluid samples. 58 PE patients were diagnosed with tumors, while 69 were tumor-free. Apo-E levels in MPE patients were significantly higher than those with benign PE (BPE) (P < .05). An Apo-E cut-off of 69.96 ng/mL yielded sensitivity and specificity of 79.31% and 73.91% respectively for MPE detection. The area under the curve for Apo-E was 0.793 (95% confidence interval: 0.712 to 0.860), which was smaller than that of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (Z = 2.081, P<.05). In addition, the combination of Apo-E and CEA detection yielded a higher sensitivity of 87.90% and specificity of 95.65% in diagnosing MPE. In conclusion, Apo-E levels in PE may be a potential biomarker for the detection of MPE. The combined detection of Apo-E and CEA could improve the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for MPE. These findings provide a simple and convenient method for clinical screening and detection of PE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7478860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74788602020-09-24 The value of apolipoprotein E in distinguishing benign and malignant unilateral pleural effusions Xue, Qing Fang, Guiju Deng, Xinyu Zhang, Canhui Liu, Zhixin Peng, Zhiwen Lai, Zibiao Peng, Yunjuan Wu, Jianhui Medicine (Baltimore) 4100 Pleural effusion (PE) remains insurmountable challenge and public health problem, requiring novel noninvasive biomarkers for accurate diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of apolipoprotein E (Apo-E) in PE, in order to determine its potential use as a diagnostic biomarker for malignant PE (MPE). PE samples were obtained from 127 patients and the etiology of PE was determined by multiple diagnostic techniques. Apo-E levels were then measured in the pleural fluid samples. 58 PE patients were diagnosed with tumors, while 69 were tumor-free. Apo-E levels in MPE patients were significantly higher than those with benign PE (BPE) (P < .05). An Apo-E cut-off of 69.96 ng/mL yielded sensitivity and specificity of 79.31% and 73.91% respectively for MPE detection. The area under the curve for Apo-E was 0.793 (95% confidence interval: 0.712 to 0.860), which was smaller than that of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (Z = 2.081, P<.05). In addition, the combination of Apo-E and CEA detection yielded a higher sensitivity of 87.90% and specificity of 95.65% in diagnosing MPE. In conclusion, Apo-E levels in PE may be a potential biomarker for the detection of MPE. The combined detection of Apo-E and CEA could improve the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for MPE. These findings provide a simple and convenient method for clinical screening and detection of PE. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7478860/ /pubmed/32150067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019320 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4100
Xue, Qing
Fang, Guiju
Deng, Xinyu
Zhang, Canhui
Liu, Zhixin
Peng, Zhiwen
Lai, Zibiao
Peng, Yunjuan
Wu, Jianhui
The value of apolipoprotein E in distinguishing benign and malignant unilateral pleural effusions
title The value of apolipoprotein E in distinguishing benign and malignant unilateral pleural effusions
title_full The value of apolipoprotein E in distinguishing benign and malignant unilateral pleural effusions
title_fullStr The value of apolipoprotein E in distinguishing benign and malignant unilateral pleural effusions
title_full_unstemmed The value of apolipoprotein E in distinguishing benign and malignant unilateral pleural effusions
title_short The value of apolipoprotein E in distinguishing benign and malignant unilateral pleural effusions
title_sort value of apolipoprotein e in distinguishing benign and malignant unilateral pleural effusions
topic 4100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019320
work_keys_str_mv AT xueqing thevalueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT fangguiju thevalueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT dengxinyu thevalueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT zhangcanhui thevalueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT liuzhixin thevalueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT pengzhiwen thevalueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT laizibiao thevalueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT pengyunjuan thevalueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT wujianhui thevalueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT xueqing valueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT fangguiju valueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT dengxinyu valueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT zhangcanhui valueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT liuzhixin valueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT pengzhiwen valueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT laizibiao valueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT pengyunjuan valueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions
AT wujianhui valueofapolipoproteineindistinguishingbenignandmalignantunilateralpleuraleffusions