Cargando…

Comparing health status between patients with COPD in primary, secondary and tertiary care

In this study, we compare health status between COPD patients treated in three different care levels in the Netherlands and assess determinants that influence their health status. We applied the Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument to measure eight health status subdomains in primary (n = 289), se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Klein, Mieke M., Peters, Jeannette B., van ’t Hul, Alex J., Akkermans, Reinier P., in ’t Veen, Johannes C., Vercoulen, Jan H., Bischoff, Erik W., Schermer, Tjard R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-020-00196-7
_version_ 1783580167142113280
author de Klein, Mieke M.
Peters, Jeannette B.
van ’t Hul, Alex J.
Akkermans, Reinier P.
in ’t Veen, Johannes C.
Vercoulen, Jan H.
Bischoff, Erik W.
Schermer, Tjard R.
author_facet de Klein, Mieke M.
Peters, Jeannette B.
van ’t Hul, Alex J.
Akkermans, Reinier P.
in ’t Veen, Johannes C.
Vercoulen, Jan H.
Bischoff, Erik W.
Schermer, Tjard R.
author_sort de Klein, Mieke M.
collection PubMed
description In this study, we compare health status between COPD patients treated in three different care levels in the Netherlands and assess determinants that influence their health status. We applied the Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument to measure eight health status subdomains in primary (n = 289), secondary (n = 184) and tertiary care (n = 433) COPD patient cohorts. Proportions of patients with severe problems in ≥3 subdomains are 47% in primary, 71% in secondary and 94% in tertiary care. Corrected for patient characteristics, differences between the care levels are statistically significant for nearly all health status subdomains. The pooled cohort data show female sex, age, FEV(1) % predicted and BMI to be determinants of one or more subdomains. We conclude that the proportion of COPD patients with severe health status problems is substantial, not just in tertiary care but also in primary and secondary care. Use of detailed health status information may support patient-tailored COPD care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7478961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74789612020-09-21 Comparing health status between patients with COPD in primary, secondary and tertiary care de Klein, Mieke M. Peters, Jeannette B. van ’t Hul, Alex J. Akkermans, Reinier P. in ’t Veen, Johannes C. Vercoulen, Jan H. Bischoff, Erik W. Schermer, Tjard R. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Article In this study, we compare health status between COPD patients treated in three different care levels in the Netherlands and assess determinants that influence their health status. We applied the Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument to measure eight health status subdomains in primary (n = 289), secondary (n = 184) and tertiary care (n = 433) COPD patient cohorts. Proportions of patients with severe problems in ≥3 subdomains are 47% in primary, 71% in secondary and 94% in tertiary care. Corrected for patient characteristics, differences between the care levels are statistically significant for nearly all health status subdomains. The pooled cohort data show female sex, age, FEV(1) % predicted and BMI to be determinants of one or more subdomains. We conclude that the proportion of COPD patients with severe health status problems is substantial, not just in tertiary care but also in primary and secondary care. Use of detailed health status information may support patient-tailored COPD care. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7478961/ /pubmed/32901030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-020-00196-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
de Klein, Mieke M.
Peters, Jeannette B.
van ’t Hul, Alex J.
Akkermans, Reinier P.
in ’t Veen, Johannes C.
Vercoulen, Jan H.
Bischoff, Erik W.
Schermer, Tjard R.
Comparing health status between patients with COPD in primary, secondary and tertiary care
title Comparing health status between patients with COPD in primary, secondary and tertiary care
title_full Comparing health status between patients with COPD in primary, secondary and tertiary care
title_fullStr Comparing health status between patients with COPD in primary, secondary and tertiary care
title_full_unstemmed Comparing health status between patients with COPD in primary, secondary and tertiary care
title_short Comparing health status between patients with COPD in primary, secondary and tertiary care
title_sort comparing health status between patients with copd in primary, secondary and tertiary care
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-020-00196-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dekleinmiekem comparinghealthstatusbetweenpatientswithcopdinprimarysecondaryandtertiarycare
AT petersjeannetteb comparinghealthstatusbetweenpatientswithcopdinprimarysecondaryandtertiarycare
AT vanthulalexj comparinghealthstatusbetweenpatientswithcopdinprimarysecondaryandtertiarycare
AT akkermansreinierp comparinghealthstatusbetweenpatientswithcopdinprimarysecondaryandtertiarycare
AT intveenjohannesc comparinghealthstatusbetweenpatientswithcopdinprimarysecondaryandtertiarycare
AT vercoulenjanh comparinghealthstatusbetweenpatientswithcopdinprimarysecondaryandtertiarycare
AT bischofferikw comparinghealthstatusbetweenpatientswithcopdinprimarysecondaryandtertiarycare
AT schermertjardr comparinghealthstatusbetweenpatientswithcopdinprimarysecondaryandtertiarycare