Cargando…

Preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being used in orthopedic surgery; however, there is significant variability and burden associated with their administration. The visual analog scale (VAS) may represent an efficient, single-question method to establish functional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beletsky, Alexander, Lu, Yining, Nwachukwu, Benedict U., Polce, Evan, Maheshwer, Bhargavi, Chahla, Jorge, Forsythe, Brian, Cole, Brian J., Verma, Nikhil N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.006
_version_ 1783580173432520704
author Beletsky, Alexander
Lu, Yining
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Polce, Evan
Maheshwer, Bhargavi
Chahla, Jorge
Forsythe, Brian
Cole, Brian J.
Verma, Nikhil N.
author_facet Beletsky, Alexander
Lu, Yining
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Polce, Evan
Maheshwer, Bhargavi
Chahla, Jorge
Forsythe, Brian
Cole, Brian J.
Verma, Nikhil N.
author_sort Beletsky, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being used in orthopedic surgery; however, there is significant variability and burden associated with their administration. The visual analog scale (VAS) may represent an efficient, single-question method to establish functional baselines in a domain-specific manner for glenohumeral arthritis. METHODS: Single-question VAS measures assessing function, strength, and pain as a percentage of normal were administered alongside legacy PROMs in patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis in a preoperative setting between October 2015 and March 2017. PROM performance was assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients. Both absolute and relative floor and ceiling effects were examined. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (age 66.09 ± 9.84 years, body mass index 28.8 ± 9.77, 57.1% male, 54.2% right-sided) were included. The VAS Pain instrument (r = 0.45-0.64) outperformed the VAS Function (r = 0.23-0.62) and VAS Strength (r = 0.21-0.65) in correlation to preoperative PROMs. The performance of VAS Pain was comparable to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES; r = 0.47-0.84). None of the VAS instruments in our study demonstrated preoperative floor effects (7.1%-8.6%) or ceiling effects (0.0%-4.3%). The most efficient instruments were Single-Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE; 0.87 ± 0.41 minutes), Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS UE CAT; 1.27 ± 1.30 minutes), and the triad of VAS measures (1.51 ± 1.61 minutes). CONCLUSION: VAS Pain outperformed VAS Strength and Function relative to legacy PROMs, while performing comparable to ASES. None of the VAS measures were susceptible to significant floor or ceiling effects preoperatively. The VAS instruments along with SANE and PROMIS UE were the most time-efficient measures. VAS instruments may have a role in establishing preoperative baselines in those with glenohumeral arthritis in a simple, efficient, and adoptable manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7478988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74789882020-09-15 Preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis Beletsky, Alexander Lu, Yining Nwachukwu, Benedict U. Polce, Evan Maheshwer, Bhargavi Chahla, Jorge Forsythe, Brian Cole, Brian J. Verma, Nikhil N. JSES Int Basic Science BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being used in orthopedic surgery; however, there is significant variability and burden associated with their administration. The visual analog scale (VAS) may represent an efficient, single-question method to establish functional baselines in a domain-specific manner for glenohumeral arthritis. METHODS: Single-question VAS measures assessing function, strength, and pain as a percentage of normal were administered alongside legacy PROMs in patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis in a preoperative setting between October 2015 and March 2017. PROM performance was assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients. Both absolute and relative floor and ceiling effects were examined. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (age 66.09 ± 9.84 years, body mass index 28.8 ± 9.77, 57.1% male, 54.2% right-sided) were included. The VAS Pain instrument (r = 0.45-0.64) outperformed the VAS Function (r = 0.23-0.62) and VAS Strength (r = 0.21-0.65) in correlation to preoperative PROMs. The performance of VAS Pain was comparable to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES; r = 0.47-0.84). None of the VAS instruments in our study demonstrated preoperative floor effects (7.1%-8.6%) or ceiling effects (0.0%-4.3%). The most efficient instruments were Single-Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE; 0.87 ± 0.41 minutes), Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS UE CAT; 1.27 ± 1.30 minutes), and the triad of VAS measures (1.51 ± 1.61 minutes). CONCLUSION: VAS Pain outperformed VAS Strength and Function relative to legacy PROMs, while performing comparable to ASES. None of the VAS measures were susceptible to significant floor or ceiling effects preoperatively. The VAS instruments along with SANE and PROMIS UE were the most time-efficient measures. VAS instruments may have a role in establishing preoperative baselines in those with glenohumeral arthritis in a simple, efficient, and adoptable manner. Elsevier 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7478988/ /pubmed/32939466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.006 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Basic Science
Beletsky, Alexander
Lu, Yining
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Polce, Evan
Maheshwer, Bhargavi
Chahla, Jorge
Forsythe, Brian
Cole, Brian J.
Verma, Nikhil N.
Preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis
title Preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis
title_full Preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis
title_fullStr Preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis
title_short Preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis
title_sort preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.006
work_keys_str_mv AT beletskyalexander preoperativepsychometricpropertiesofvisualanalogscaleasessmentsforfunctionpainandstrengthcomparedwithlegacyupperextremityoutcomemeasuresinglenohumeralosteoarthritis
AT luyining preoperativepsychometricpropertiesofvisualanalogscaleasessmentsforfunctionpainandstrengthcomparedwithlegacyupperextremityoutcomemeasuresinglenohumeralosteoarthritis
AT nwachukwubenedictu preoperativepsychometricpropertiesofvisualanalogscaleasessmentsforfunctionpainandstrengthcomparedwithlegacyupperextremityoutcomemeasuresinglenohumeralosteoarthritis
AT polceevan preoperativepsychometricpropertiesofvisualanalogscaleasessmentsforfunctionpainandstrengthcomparedwithlegacyupperextremityoutcomemeasuresinglenohumeralosteoarthritis
AT maheshwerbhargavi preoperativepsychometricpropertiesofvisualanalogscaleasessmentsforfunctionpainandstrengthcomparedwithlegacyupperextremityoutcomemeasuresinglenohumeralosteoarthritis
AT chahlajorge preoperativepsychometricpropertiesofvisualanalogscaleasessmentsforfunctionpainandstrengthcomparedwithlegacyupperextremityoutcomemeasuresinglenohumeralosteoarthritis
AT forsythebrian preoperativepsychometricpropertiesofvisualanalogscaleasessmentsforfunctionpainandstrengthcomparedwithlegacyupperextremityoutcomemeasuresinglenohumeralosteoarthritis
AT colebrianj preoperativepsychometricpropertiesofvisualanalogscaleasessmentsforfunctionpainandstrengthcomparedwithlegacyupperextremityoutcomemeasuresinglenohumeralosteoarthritis
AT vermanikhiln preoperativepsychometricpropertiesofvisualanalogscaleasessmentsforfunctionpainandstrengthcomparedwithlegacyupperextremityoutcomemeasuresinglenohumeralosteoarthritis