Cargando…
Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle
BACKGROUND: Radiographic measurements of shortening and vertical displacement in the fractured clavicle are subject to a variety of factors such as patient positioning and projection. The aims of this study were (1) to quantify differences in shortening and vertical displacement in varying patient p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.005 |
_version_ | 1783580173689421824 |
---|---|
author | Hoogervorst, Paul van Geene, Arnoud Gundlach, Udo Wei, Abel Verdonschot, Nico Hannink, Gerjon |
author_facet | Hoogervorst, Paul van Geene, Arnoud Gundlach, Udo Wei, Abel Verdonschot, Nico Hannink, Gerjon |
author_sort | Hoogervorst, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Radiographic measurements of shortening and vertical displacement in the fractured clavicle are subject to a variety of factors such as patient positioning and projection. The aims of this study were (1) to quantify differences in shortening and vertical displacement in varying patient positions and X-ray projections, (2) to identify the view and patient positioning indicating the largest amount of shortening and vertical displacement, and (3) to identify and quantify the inter- and intraobserver agreement. METHODS: A prospective clinical measurement study of 22 acute Robinson type 2B1 clavicle fractures was performed. Each patient underwent 8 consecutive standardized and calibrated X-rays in 1 setting. RESULTS: In the upright patient position, the difference of absolute shortening was 4.5 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-5.9, P < .0001) larger than in the supine patient position. For vertical displacement, the odds of being scored a category higher in the upright patient position were 4.7 (95% CI: 2.2-9.8) times as large as the odds of being scored a category higher in supine position. The odds of being scored a category higher on the caudocranial projection were 5.9 (95% CI: 2.8-12.6) times as large as the odds of being scored a category higher on the craniocaudal projection. CONCLUSION: Absolute shortening, relative shortening, and vertical displacement were found to be the greatest in the upright patient positioning with the arm protracted orientation on a 15° caudocranial projection. No statistically significant differences were found for a change in position of the arm between neutral and protracted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7478989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74789892020-09-15 Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle Hoogervorst, Paul van Geene, Arnoud Gundlach, Udo Wei, Abel Verdonschot, Nico Hannink, Gerjon JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Radiographic measurements of shortening and vertical displacement in the fractured clavicle are subject to a variety of factors such as patient positioning and projection. The aims of this study were (1) to quantify differences in shortening and vertical displacement in varying patient positions and X-ray projections, (2) to identify the view and patient positioning indicating the largest amount of shortening and vertical displacement, and (3) to identify and quantify the inter- and intraobserver agreement. METHODS: A prospective clinical measurement study of 22 acute Robinson type 2B1 clavicle fractures was performed. Each patient underwent 8 consecutive standardized and calibrated X-rays in 1 setting. RESULTS: In the upright patient position, the difference of absolute shortening was 4.5 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-5.9, P < .0001) larger than in the supine patient position. For vertical displacement, the odds of being scored a category higher in the upright patient position were 4.7 (95% CI: 2.2-9.8) times as large as the odds of being scored a category higher in supine position. The odds of being scored a category higher on the caudocranial projection were 5.9 (95% CI: 2.8-12.6) times as large as the odds of being scored a category higher on the craniocaudal projection. CONCLUSION: Absolute shortening, relative shortening, and vertical displacement were found to be the greatest in the upright patient positioning with the arm protracted orientation on a 15° caudocranial projection. No statistically significant differences were found for a change in position of the arm between neutral and protracted. Elsevier 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7478989/ /pubmed/32939476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.005 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Shoulder Hoogervorst, Paul van Geene, Arnoud Gundlach, Udo Wei, Abel Verdonschot, Nico Hannink, Gerjon Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle |
title | Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle |
title_full | Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle |
title_fullStr | Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle |
title_short | Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle |
title_sort | influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle |
topic | Shoulder |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoogervorstpaul influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle AT vangeenearnoud influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle AT gundlachudo influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle AT weiabel influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle AT verdonschotnico influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle AT hanninkgerjon influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle |