Cargando…

Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle

BACKGROUND: Radiographic measurements of shortening and vertical displacement in the fractured clavicle are subject to a variety of factors such as patient positioning and projection. The aims of this study were (1) to quantify differences in shortening and vertical displacement in varying patient p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoogervorst, Paul, van Geene, Arnoud, Gundlach, Udo, Wei, Abel, Verdonschot, Nico, Hannink, Gerjon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.005
_version_ 1783580173689421824
author Hoogervorst, Paul
van Geene, Arnoud
Gundlach, Udo
Wei, Abel
Verdonschot, Nico
Hannink, Gerjon
author_facet Hoogervorst, Paul
van Geene, Arnoud
Gundlach, Udo
Wei, Abel
Verdonschot, Nico
Hannink, Gerjon
author_sort Hoogervorst, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiographic measurements of shortening and vertical displacement in the fractured clavicle are subject to a variety of factors such as patient positioning and projection. The aims of this study were (1) to quantify differences in shortening and vertical displacement in varying patient positions and X-ray projections, (2) to identify the view and patient positioning indicating the largest amount of shortening and vertical displacement, and (3) to identify and quantify the inter- and intraobserver agreement. METHODS: A prospective clinical measurement study of 22 acute Robinson type 2B1 clavicle fractures was performed. Each patient underwent 8 consecutive standardized and calibrated X-rays in 1 setting. RESULTS: In the upright patient position, the difference of absolute shortening was 4.5 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-5.9, P < .0001) larger than in the supine patient position. For vertical displacement, the odds of being scored a category higher in the upright patient position were 4.7 (95% CI: 2.2-9.8) times as large as the odds of being scored a category higher in supine position. The odds of being scored a category higher on the caudocranial projection were 5.9 (95% CI: 2.8-12.6) times as large as the odds of being scored a category higher on the craniocaudal projection. CONCLUSION: Absolute shortening, relative shortening, and vertical displacement were found to be the greatest in the upright patient positioning with the arm protracted orientation on a 15° caudocranial projection. No statistically significant differences were found for a change in position of the arm between neutral and protracted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7478989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74789892020-09-15 Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle Hoogervorst, Paul van Geene, Arnoud Gundlach, Udo Wei, Abel Verdonschot, Nico Hannink, Gerjon JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Radiographic measurements of shortening and vertical displacement in the fractured clavicle are subject to a variety of factors such as patient positioning and projection. The aims of this study were (1) to quantify differences in shortening and vertical displacement in varying patient positions and X-ray projections, (2) to identify the view and patient positioning indicating the largest amount of shortening and vertical displacement, and (3) to identify and quantify the inter- and intraobserver agreement. METHODS: A prospective clinical measurement study of 22 acute Robinson type 2B1 clavicle fractures was performed. Each patient underwent 8 consecutive standardized and calibrated X-rays in 1 setting. RESULTS: In the upright patient position, the difference of absolute shortening was 4.5 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-5.9, P < .0001) larger than in the supine patient position. For vertical displacement, the odds of being scored a category higher in the upright patient position were 4.7 (95% CI: 2.2-9.8) times as large as the odds of being scored a category higher in supine position. The odds of being scored a category higher on the caudocranial projection were 5.9 (95% CI: 2.8-12.6) times as large as the odds of being scored a category higher on the craniocaudal projection. CONCLUSION: Absolute shortening, relative shortening, and vertical displacement were found to be the greatest in the upright patient positioning with the arm protracted orientation on a 15° caudocranial projection. No statistically significant differences were found for a change in position of the arm between neutral and protracted. Elsevier 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7478989/ /pubmed/32939476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.005 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Hoogervorst, Paul
van Geene, Arnoud
Gundlach, Udo
Wei, Abel
Verdonschot, Nico
Hannink, Gerjon
Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle
title Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle
title_full Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle
title_fullStr Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle
title_full_unstemmed Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle
title_short Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle
title_sort influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.005
work_keys_str_mv AT hoogervorstpaul influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle
AT vangeenearnoud influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle
AT gundlachudo influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle
AT weiabel influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle
AT verdonschotnico influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle
AT hanninkgerjon influenceofradiographicprojectionandpatientpositioningonshorteningofthefracturedclavicle