Cargando…

Website evaluation for shoulder and elbow fellowships in the United States: an evaluation of accessibility and content

HYPOTHESIS AND/OR BACKGROUND: When examining the access and content related to shoulder and elbow fellowship websites, only 64% of programs had individual websites in a query performed 5 years earlier. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate content about individual programs listed on the Ameri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khwaja, Ansab, Du, Peter Z., DeSilva, Gregory L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.011
_version_ 1783580186879459328
author Khwaja, Ansab
Du, Peter Z.
DeSilva, Gregory L.
author_facet Khwaja, Ansab
Du, Peter Z.
DeSilva, Gregory L.
author_sort Khwaja, Ansab
collection PubMed
description HYPOTHESIS AND/OR BACKGROUND: When examining the access and content related to shoulder and elbow fellowship websites, only 64% of programs had individual websites in a query performed 5 years earlier. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate content about individual programs listed on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) website and on individual program websites and compare the results to prior data. METHODS: The ASES website was accessed to determine both the number of ASES-recognized shoulder and elbow fellowships and the number of direct links to fellowship program websites. A Google search was also performed to determine the ease of access to fellowship program websites. Each website was then evaluated for content in regard to their recruitment and educational program. RESULTS: The ASES website includes contact information and a brief description for 29 programs with 40 reported positions. When trying to identify links to program websites, there were functioning links to 6 programs (21%) and absent/nonfunctioning links for the remaining 23 (79%). Through a Google search, there were functioning links to 22 (76%) and absent/nonfunctioning links for 7 (24%) programs. All 29 program websites had faculty listing and program contact info whereas 28 (97%) had a description of their program. In terms of educational content, 17 (59%) included description of operative cases and 18 (62%) had descriptions of rotations/curriculum. DISCUSSION AND/OR CONCLUSION: Individual shoulder and elbow fellowship program websites provide varied content and accessibility. In the intervening 5 years, there has been minimal improvement in the accessibility of individual fellowship websites from the ASES website.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7479047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74790472020-09-15 Website evaluation for shoulder and elbow fellowships in the United States: an evaluation of accessibility and content Khwaja, Ansab Du, Peter Z. DeSilva, Gregory L. JSES Int Basic Science HYPOTHESIS AND/OR BACKGROUND: When examining the access and content related to shoulder and elbow fellowship websites, only 64% of programs had individual websites in a query performed 5 years earlier. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate content about individual programs listed on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) website and on individual program websites and compare the results to prior data. METHODS: The ASES website was accessed to determine both the number of ASES-recognized shoulder and elbow fellowships and the number of direct links to fellowship program websites. A Google search was also performed to determine the ease of access to fellowship program websites. Each website was then evaluated for content in regard to their recruitment and educational program. RESULTS: The ASES website includes contact information and a brief description for 29 programs with 40 reported positions. When trying to identify links to program websites, there were functioning links to 6 programs (21%) and absent/nonfunctioning links for the remaining 23 (79%). Through a Google search, there were functioning links to 22 (76%) and absent/nonfunctioning links for 7 (24%) programs. All 29 program websites had faculty listing and program contact info whereas 28 (97%) had a description of their program. In terms of educational content, 17 (59%) included description of operative cases and 18 (62%) had descriptions of rotations/curriculum. DISCUSSION AND/OR CONCLUSION: Individual shoulder and elbow fellowship program websites provide varied content and accessibility. In the intervening 5 years, there has been minimal improvement in the accessibility of individual fellowship websites from the ASES website. Elsevier 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7479047/ /pubmed/32939467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.011 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Basic Science
Khwaja, Ansab
Du, Peter Z.
DeSilva, Gregory L.
Website evaluation for shoulder and elbow fellowships in the United States: an evaluation of accessibility and content
title Website evaluation for shoulder and elbow fellowships in the United States: an evaluation of accessibility and content
title_full Website evaluation for shoulder and elbow fellowships in the United States: an evaluation of accessibility and content
title_fullStr Website evaluation for shoulder and elbow fellowships in the United States: an evaluation of accessibility and content
title_full_unstemmed Website evaluation for shoulder and elbow fellowships in the United States: an evaluation of accessibility and content
title_short Website evaluation for shoulder and elbow fellowships in the United States: an evaluation of accessibility and content
title_sort website evaluation for shoulder and elbow fellowships in the united states: an evaluation of accessibility and content
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.011
work_keys_str_mv AT khwajaansab websiteevaluationforshoulderandelbowfellowshipsintheunitedstatesanevaluationofaccessibilityandcontent
AT dupeterz websiteevaluationforshoulderandelbowfellowshipsintheunitedstatesanevaluationofaccessibilityandcontent
AT desilvagregoryl websiteevaluationforshoulderandelbowfellowshipsintheunitedstatesanevaluationofaccessibilityandcontent