Cargando…
Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of odors in the olfactory identification (OI) test and other known risk factors for predicting incident dementia in the prospective Shanghai Aging Study. METHODS: At baseline, OI was assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Screening Test 12, which contain...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00266 |
_version_ | 1783580194945105920 |
---|---|
author | Ding, Ding Xiao, Zhenxu Liang, Xiaoniu Wu, Wanqing Zhao, Qianhua Cao, Yang |
author_facet | Ding, Ding Xiao, Zhenxu Liang, Xiaoniu Wu, Wanqing Zhao, Qianhua Cao, Yang |
author_sort | Ding, Ding |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of odors in the olfactory identification (OI) test and other known risk factors for predicting incident dementia in the prospective Shanghai Aging Study. METHODS: At baseline, OI was assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Screening Test 12, which contains 12 different odors. Cognition assessment and consensus diagnosis were conducted at both baseline and follow-up to identify incident dementia. Four different multivariable logistic regression (MLR) models were used for predicting incident dementia. In the no-odor model, only demographics, lifestyle, and medical history variables were included. In the single-odor model, we further added one single odor to the first model. In the full model, all 12 odors were included. In the stepwise model, the variables were selected using a bidirectional stepwise selection method. The predictive abilities of these models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The permutation importance method was used to evaluate the relative importance of different odors and other known risk factors. RESULTS: Seventy-five (8%) incident dementia cases were diagnosed during 4.9 years of follow-up among 947 participants. The full and the stepwise MLR model (AUC = 0.916 and 0.914, respectively) have better predictive abilities compared with those of the no- or single-odor models. The five most important variables are Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, age, peppermint detection, coronary artery disease, and height in the full model, and MMSE, age, peppermint detection, stroke, and education in the stepwise model. The combination of only the top five variables in the stepwise model (AUC = 0.901 and sensitivity = 0.880) has as a good a predictive ability as other models. CONCLUSION: The ability to smell peppermint might be one of the useful indicators for predicting dementia. Combining peppermint detection with MMSE, age, education, and history of stroke may have sensitive and robust predictive value for dementia in older adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7479092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74790922020-09-30 Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study Ding, Ding Xiao, Zhenxu Liang, Xiaoniu Wu, Wanqing Zhao, Qianhua Cao, Yang Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of odors in the olfactory identification (OI) test and other known risk factors for predicting incident dementia in the prospective Shanghai Aging Study. METHODS: At baseline, OI was assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Screening Test 12, which contains 12 different odors. Cognition assessment and consensus diagnosis were conducted at both baseline and follow-up to identify incident dementia. Four different multivariable logistic regression (MLR) models were used for predicting incident dementia. In the no-odor model, only demographics, lifestyle, and medical history variables were included. In the single-odor model, we further added one single odor to the first model. In the full model, all 12 odors were included. In the stepwise model, the variables were selected using a bidirectional stepwise selection method. The predictive abilities of these models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The permutation importance method was used to evaluate the relative importance of different odors and other known risk factors. RESULTS: Seventy-five (8%) incident dementia cases were diagnosed during 4.9 years of follow-up among 947 participants. The full and the stepwise MLR model (AUC = 0.916 and 0.914, respectively) have better predictive abilities compared with those of the no- or single-odor models. The five most important variables are Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, age, peppermint detection, coronary artery disease, and height in the full model, and MMSE, age, peppermint detection, stroke, and education in the stepwise model. The combination of only the top five variables in the stepwise model (AUC = 0.901 and sensitivity = 0.880) has as a good a predictive ability as other models. CONCLUSION: The ability to smell peppermint might be one of the useful indicators for predicting dementia. Combining peppermint detection with MMSE, age, education, and history of stroke may have sensitive and robust predictive value for dementia in older adults. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7479092/ /pubmed/33005146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00266 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ding, Xiao, Liang, Wu, Zhao and Cao. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Ding, Ding Xiao, Zhenxu Liang, Xiaoniu Wu, Wanqing Zhao, Qianhua Cao, Yang Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study |
title | Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study |
title_full | Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study |
title_fullStr | Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study |
title_short | Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study |
title_sort | predictive value of odor identification for incident dementia: the shanghai aging study |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00266 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dingding predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy AT xiaozhenxu predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy AT liangxiaoniu predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy AT wuwanqing predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy AT zhaoqianhua predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy AT caoyang predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy |