Cargando…

Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of odors in the olfactory identification (OI) test and other known risk factors for predicting incident dementia in the prospective Shanghai Aging Study. METHODS: At baseline, OI was assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Screening Test 12, which contain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Ding, Xiao, Zhenxu, Liang, Xiaoniu, Wu, Wanqing, Zhao, Qianhua, Cao, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00266
_version_ 1783580194945105920
author Ding, Ding
Xiao, Zhenxu
Liang, Xiaoniu
Wu, Wanqing
Zhao, Qianhua
Cao, Yang
author_facet Ding, Ding
Xiao, Zhenxu
Liang, Xiaoniu
Wu, Wanqing
Zhao, Qianhua
Cao, Yang
author_sort Ding, Ding
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of odors in the olfactory identification (OI) test and other known risk factors for predicting incident dementia in the prospective Shanghai Aging Study. METHODS: At baseline, OI was assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Screening Test 12, which contains 12 different odors. Cognition assessment and consensus diagnosis were conducted at both baseline and follow-up to identify incident dementia. Four different multivariable logistic regression (MLR) models were used for predicting incident dementia. In the no-odor model, only demographics, lifestyle, and medical history variables were included. In the single-odor model, we further added one single odor to the first model. In the full model, all 12 odors were included. In the stepwise model, the variables were selected using a bidirectional stepwise selection method. The predictive abilities of these models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The permutation importance method was used to evaluate the relative importance of different odors and other known risk factors. RESULTS: Seventy-five (8%) incident dementia cases were diagnosed during 4.9 years of follow-up among 947 participants. The full and the stepwise MLR model (AUC = 0.916 and 0.914, respectively) have better predictive abilities compared with those of the no- or single-odor models. The five most important variables are Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, age, peppermint detection, coronary artery disease, and height in the full model, and MMSE, age, peppermint detection, stroke, and education in the stepwise model. The combination of only the top five variables in the stepwise model (AUC = 0.901 and sensitivity = 0.880) has as a good a predictive ability as other models. CONCLUSION: The ability to smell peppermint might be one of the useful indicators for predicting dementia. Combining peppermint detection with MMSE, age, education, and history of stroke may have sensitive and robust predictive value for dementia in older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7479092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74790922020-09-30 Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study Ding, Ding Xiao, Zhenxu Liang, Xiaoniu Wu, Wanqing Zhao, Qianhua Cao, Yang Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of odors in the olfactory identification (OI) test and other known risk factors for predicting incident dementia in the prospective Shanghai Aging Study. METHODS: At baseline, OI was assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Screening Test 12, which contains 12 different odors. Cognition assessment and consensus diagnosis were conducted at both baseline and follow-up to identify incident dementia. Four different multivariable logistic regression (MLR) models were used for predicting incident dementia. In the no-odor model, only demographics, lifestyle, and medical history variables were included. In the single-odor model, we further added one single odor to the first model. In the full model, all 12 odors were included. In the stepwise model, the variables were selected using a bidirectional stepwise selection method. The predictive abilities of these models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The permutation importance method was used to evaluate the relative importance of different odors and other known risk factors. RESULTS: Seventy-five (8%) incident dementia cases were diagnosed during 4.9 years of follow-up among 947 participants. The full and the stepwise MLR model (AUC = 0.916 and 0.914, respectively) have better predictive abilities compared with those of the no- or single-odor models. The five most important variables are Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, age, peppermint detection, coronary artery disease, and height in the full model, and MMSE, age, peppermint detection, stroke, and education in the stepwise model. The combination of only the top five variables in the stepwise model (AUC = 0.901 and sensitivity = 0.880) has as a good a predictive ability as other models. CONCLUSION: The ability to smell peppermint might be one of the useful indicators for predicting dementia. Combining peppermint detection with MMSE, age, education, and history of stroke may have sensitive and robust predictive value for dementia in older adults. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7479092/ /pubmed/33005146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00266 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ding, Xiao, Liang, Wu, Zhao and Cao. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ding, Ding
Xiao, Zhenxu
Liang, Xiaoniu
Wu, Wanqing
Zhao, Qianhua
Cao, Yang
Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study
title Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study
title_full Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study
title_fullStr Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study
title_short Predictive Value of Odor Identification for Incident Dementia: The Shanghai Aging Study
title_sort predictive value of odor identification for incident dementia: the shanghai aging study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00266
work_keys_str_mv AT dingding predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy
AT xiaozhenxu predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy
AT liangxiaoniu predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy
AT wuwanqing predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy
AT zhaoqianhua predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy
AT caoyang predictivevalueofodoridentificationforincidentdementiatheshanghaiagingstudy