Cargando…

A comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: According to previous studies, physiological gait pattern was found in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) as compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) concerning the gait parameters including gait speed, cadence, and step length. However, little attention had been paid to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishizawa, Kohei, Harato, Kengo, Morishige, Yutaro, Kobayashi, Shu, Niki, Yasuo, Nagura, Takeo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32983900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2020.07.003
_version_ 1783580236260048896
author Nishizawa, Kohei
Harato, Kengo
Morishige, Yutaro
Kobayashi, Shu
Niki, Yasuo
Nagura, Takeo
author_facet Nishizawa, Kohei
Harato, Kengo
Morishige, Yutaro
Kobayashi, Shu
Niki, Yasuo
Nagura, Takeo
author_sort Nishizawa, Kohei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: According to previous studies, physiological gait pattern was found in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) as compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) concerning the gait parameters including gait speed, cadence, and step length. However, little attention had been paid to the detailed kinematic and kinetic differences during gait between TKAs and UKAs. The aim of the present study was to investigate and to clarify the biomechanical differences between posterior stabilized TKAs and fixed bearing UKAs during walking METHODS: A total of 28 patients participated in the present study. Fifteen patients who underwent TKA and thirteen patients who underwent UKA were enrolled. Gait analysis was done at an average of 12.9 months after surgery. The subjects performed level walking at a preferred speed. For each subject, three-dimensional kinematic, kinetic and ground reaction force data were recorded as well as clinical data including range of motion at the knee joint and plain radiographs. Differences of knee kinematics or kinetics were compared between TKAs and UKAs using two-tailed Mann Whitney U-test. RESULTS: On physical examination, passive range motion was significantly smaller in TKAs than in UKAs, while femorotibial angle on plain radiographs was not significantly different on plain radiographs. In terms of kinematics, TKAs were more flexed at heel contact and less extended in mid-stance phase compared to UKAs in the sagittal plane, and total excursion of TKAs were also smaller than UKAs. Regarding knee kinetics, TKA patients had significantly less peak tibial internal rotation moment in terminal stance phase. In addition, peak knee adduction moment was significantly larger in UKAs than in TKAs, while peak knee flexion moment was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Posterior stabilized TKAs exhibited less peak tibial internal rotation moment, which is known as pivot shift avoidance gait, in the present study, compared to fixed bearing UKAs. TKAs had similar gait pattern to anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees, compared to UKAs even if patients with TKAs had no subjective pain during walking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7479273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74792732020-09-24 A comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties Nishizawa, Kohei Harato, Kengo Morishige, Yutaro Kobayashi, Shu Niki, Yasuo Nagura, Takeo Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol Original Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: According to previous studies, physiological gait pattern was found in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) as compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) concerning the gait parameters including gait speed, cadence, and step length. However, little attention had been paid to the detailed kinematic and kinetic differences during gait between TKAs and UKAs. The aim of the present study was to investigate and to clarify the biomechanical differences between posterior stabilized TKAs and fixed bearing UKAs during walking METHODS: A total of 28 patients participated in the present study. Fifteen patients who underwent TKA and thirteen patients who underwent UKA were enrolled. Gait analysis was done at an average of 12.9 months after surgery. The subjects performed level walking at a preferred speed. For each subject, three-dimensional kinematic, kinetic and ground reaction force data were recorded as well as clinical data including range of motion at the knee joint and plain radiographs. Differences of knee kinematics or kinetics were compared between TKAs and UKAs using two-tailed Mann Whitney U-test. RESULTS: On physical examination, passive range motion was significantly smaller in TKAs than in UKAs, while femorotibial angle on plain radiographs was not significantly different on plain radiographs. In terms of kinematics, TKAs were more flexed at heel contact and less extended in mid-stance phase compared to UKAs in the sagittal plane, and total excursion of TKAs were also smaller than UKAs. Regarding knee kinetics, TKA patients had significantly less peak tibial internal rotation moment in terminal stance phase. In addition, peak knee adduction moment was significantly larger in UKAs than in TKAs, while peak knee flexion moment was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Posterior stabilized TKAs exhibited less peak tibial internal rotation moment, which is known as pivot shift avoidance gait, in the present study, compared to fixed bearing UKAs. TKAs had similar gait pattern to anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees, compared to UKAs even if patients with TKAs had no subjective pain during walking. Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7479273/ /pubmed/32983900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2020.07.003 Text en © 2020 Asia Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nishizawa, Kohei
Harato, Kengo
Morishige, Yutaro
Kobayashi, Shu
Niki, Yasuo
Nagura, Takeo
A comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties
title A comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties
title_full A comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties
title_fullStr A comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties
title_short A comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties
title_sort comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32983900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2020.07.003
work_keys_str_mv AT nishizawakohei acomparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT haratokengo acomparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT morishigeyutaro acomparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT kobayashishu acomparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT nikiyasuo acomparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT naguratakeo acomparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT nishizawakohei comparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT haratokengo comparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT morishigeyutaro comparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT kobayashishu comparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT nikiyasuo comparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties
AT naguratakeo comparisonofgaitcharacteristicsbetweenposteriorstabilizedtotalkneeandfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplasties