Cargando…
Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix
BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors of appendix (ANETs) known as carcinoids, are rare endocrine neoplasms originated from enterochromaffin cells of gastrointestinal tract. ANETs are the third most frequent (16.7%) gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, with the incidence of 0.08-0.2 cases/100000 duri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953846 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i17.3697 |
_version_ | 1783580297365815296 |
---|---|
author | Saponjski, Jelena Macut, Djuro Sobic-Saranovic, Dragana Ognjanovic, Sanja Bozic Antic, Ivana Pavlovic, Djordje Artiko, Vera |
author_facet | Saponjski, Jelena Macut, Djuro Sobic-Saranovic, Dragana Ognjanovic, Sanja Bozic Antic, Ivana Pavlovic, Djordje Artiko, Vera |
author_sort | Saponjski, Jelena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors of appendix (ANETs) known as carcinoids, are rare endocrine neoplasms originated from enterochromaffin cells of gastrointestinal tract. ANETs are the third most frequent (16.7%) gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, with the incidence of 0.08-0.2 cases/100000 during one year. Incidental ANETs occur in 0.2%-0.7% of emergency surgical resections because of suspected appendicitis which is usually the first manifestation of ANET. Although there are a lot of papers about application of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, there are very rare sporadic cases described about ANETs particularly. AIM: To establish the role of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of appendix (ANET). METHODS: The total of 35 patients was investigated, 23 females and 12 males, average age (43.7 ± 17.3 years). All patients had histological diagnosis of ANET (34 carcinoids of appendix and one tubular carcinoid). Majority of tumors have been found incidentally during surgery of: Acute appendicitis (n = 15), perforated appendicitis (n = 2), ileus (n = 3), hysterectomy (n = 3), ruptured ovarian cyst (n = 2), caecal volvulus (n = 1), while 9 patients had diagnosis of appendiceal tumor before the surgery. Seventeen patients had tumor grade (G) G1, 12 G2 and 6 G3. The right hemicolectomy was performed in 13, while the rest of the patients had appendectomy only. SRS was done early (2 h) and late (24 h) after i.v. application of 740 MBq technetium-99m ethylenediamine-N, N'-diacetic acid Hydrazinonicotinyl-Tyr3-Octreotide (technetium-99m-Tektrotyd, Polatom, Poland). SRS was performed for restaging in all the patients after surgery. RESULTS: There were 12 true positive (TP), 19 true negative, 3 false positive and 1 false negative SRS result. Sensitivity of the method was 92.31%, specificity was 86.36%, positive predictive value was 80.00%, negative predictive value was 95.00% and accuracy 88.57%. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that SRS scintigraphy is a good test for detection TP cases [area under the curve of 0.850, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.710-0.990, P < 001]. Single photon emission computed tomography contributed diagnosis in 7 TP findings. In 10 patients Krenning score was 4 and in 2 was 3. In 8 patients SRS significantly changed the management of the patients (in two surgery was repeated, in 4 somatostatin analogues and in two peptide receptor radionuclide therapy). Median progression-free survival in SRS positive patients was 52 months (95%CI: 39.7-117.3 mo) while in SRS negative patients it was 60 months (95%CI: 42.8-77.1 mo), without statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.434). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results confirmed the value of SRS in the follow-up of the patients with ANET after surgery, if recurrences or metastases are suspected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7479554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74795542020-09-18 Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix Saponjski, Jelena Macut, Djuro Sobic-Saranovic, Dragana Ognjanovic, Sanja Bozic Antic, Ivana Pavlovic, Djordje Artiko, Vera World J Clin Cases Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors of appendix (ANETs) known as carcinoids, are rare endocrine neoplasms originated from enterochromaffin cells of gastrointestinal tract. ANETs are the third most frequent (16.7%) gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, with the incidence of 0.08-0.2 cases/100000 during one year. Incidental ANETs occur in 0.2%-0.7% of emergency surgical resections because of suspected appendicitis which is usually the first manifestation of ANET. Although there are a lot of papers about application of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, there are very rare sporadic cases described about ANETs particularly. AIM: To establish the role of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of appendix (ANET). METHODS: The total of 35 patients was investigated, 23 females and 12 males, average age (43.7 ± 17.3 years). All patients had histological diagnosis of ANET (34 carcinoids of appendix and one tubular carcinoid). Majority of tumors have been found incidentally during surgery of: Acute appendicitis (n = 15), perforated appendicitis (n = 2), ileus (n = 3), hysterectomy (n = 3), ruptured ovarian cyst (n = 2), caecal volvulus (n = 1), while 9 patients had diagnosis of appendiceal tumor before the surgery. Seventeen patients had tumor grade (G) G1, 12 G2 and 6 G3. The right hemicolectomy was performed in 13, while the rest of the patients had appendectomy only. SRS was done early (2 h) and late (24 h) after i.v. application of 740 MBq technetium-99m ethylenediamine-N, N'-diacetic acid Hydrazinonicotinyl-Tyr3-Octreotide (technetium-99m-Tektrotyd, Polatom, Poland). SRS was performed for restaging in all the patients after surgery. RESULTS: There were 12 true positive (TP), 19 true negative, 3 false positive and 1 false negative SRS result. Sensitivity of the method was 92.31%, specificity was 86.36%, positive predictive value was 80.00%, negative predictive value was 95.00% and accuracy 88.57%. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that SRS scintigraphy is a good test for detection TP cases [area under the curve of 0.850, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.710-0.990, P < 001]. Single photon emission computed tomography contributed diagnosis in 7 TP findings. In 10 patients Krenning score was 4 and in 2 was 3. In 8 patients SRS significantly changed the management of the patients (in two surgery was repeated, in 4 somatostatin analogues and in two peptide receptor radionuclide therapy). Median progression-free survival in SRS positive patients was 52 months (95%CI: 39.7-117.3 mo) while in SRS negative patients it was 60 months (95%CI: 42.8-77.1 mo), without statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.434). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results confirmed the value of SRS in the follow-up of the patients with ANET after surgery, if recurrences or metastases are suspected. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-09-06 2020-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7479554/ /pubmed/32953846 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i17.3697 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Saponjski, Jelena Macut, Djuro Sobic-Saranovic, Dragana Ognjanovic, Sanja Bozic Antic, Ivana Pavlovic, Djordje Artiko, Vera Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix |
title | Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix |
title_full | Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix |
title_fullStr | Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix |
title_full_unstemmed | Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix |
title_short | Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix |
title_sort | somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953846 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i17.3697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saponjskijelena somatostatinreceptorscintigraphyinthefollowupofneuroendocrineneoplasmsofappendix AT macutdjuro somatostatinreceptorscintigraphyinthefollowupofneuroendocrineneoplasmsofappendix AT sobicsaranovicdragana somatostatinreceptorscintigraphyinthefollowupofneuroendocrineneoplasmsofappendix AT ognjanovicsanja somatostatinreceptorscintigraphyinthefollowupofneuroendocrineneoplasmsofappendix AT bozicanticivana somatostatinreceptorscintigraphyinthefollowupofneuroendocrineneoplasmsofappendix AT pavlovicdjordje somatostatinreceptorscintigraphyinthefollowupofneuroendocrineneoplasmsofappendix AT artikovera somatostatinreceptorscintigraphyinthefollowupofneuroendocrineneoplasmsofappendix |