Cargando…
Germ-Free Mice Under Two-Layer Textiles Are Fully Protected From Bacteria in Sprayed Microdroplets: A Functional in vivo Test Method of Facemask/Filtration Materials
Several studies have measured the effectiveness of masks at retaining particles of various sizes in vitro. To identify a functional in vivo model, herein we used germ-free (GF) mice to test the effectiveness of textiles as filtration material and droplet barriers to complement available in vitro-bas...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32984381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00504 |
_version_ | 1783580329479503872 |
---|---|
author | Rodriguez-Palacios, Alex Conger, Mathew Cominelli, Fabio |
author_facet | Rodriguez-Palacios, Alex Conger, Mathew Cominelli, Fabio |
author_sort | Rodriguez-Palacios, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several studies have measured the effectiveness of masks at retaining particles of various sizes in vitro. To identify a functional in vivo model, herein we used germ-free (GF) mice to test the effectiveness of textiles as filtration material and droplet barriers to complement available in vitro-based knowledge. Herein, we report a study conducted in vivo with bacteria-carrying microdroplets to determine to what extent household textiles prevent contamination of GF mice in their environment. Using a recently validated spray-simulation method (mimicking a sneeze), herein we first determined that combed-cotton textiles used as two-layer-barriers covering the mouse cages prevented the contamination of all GF animals when sprayed 10–20 bacterial-droplet units/cm(2). In additional to exposure trials, the model showed that GF mice were again protected by the combed-cotton textile after the acute exposure to 10 times more droplets (20 “spray-sneezes”, ~200 bacterial-droplet units/cm(2)). Overall, two-layer combed-cotton protected 100% of the GF mice from bacteria-carrying droplets (n = 20 exposure-events), which was significantly superior compared to 100% mouse contamination without textile coverage or when 95% partly covered (n = 18, Fisher-exact, p < 0.0001). Of relevance is that two different densities of cotton were equally effective (100%) in preventing contamination regardless of density (120–vs. 200 g/m(2); T-test, p = 0.0028), suggesting that similar density materials could prevent droplet contamination. As a practical message, we conducted a speech trial (counting numbers, 1–100) with/without the protection of the same cotton textile used as face cover. The trial illustrated that contamination of surfaces occurs at a rate of >2–6 bacteria-carrying saliva-droplets per word (2.6 droplets/cm(2), 30 cm) when speaking at 60–70 decibels and that cotton face covers fully prevent bacterial surface contamination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7479817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74798172020-09-26 Germ-Free Mice Under Two-Layer Textiles Are Fully Protected From Bacteria in Sprayed Microdroplets: A Functional in vivo Test Method of Facemask/Filtration Materials Rodriguez-Palacios, Alex Conger, Mathew Cominelli, Fabio Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Several studies have measured the effectiveness of masks at retaining particles of various sizes in vitro. To identify a functional in vivo model, herein we used germ-free (GF) mice to test the effectiveness of textiles as filtration material and droplet barriers to complement available in vitro-based knowledge. Herein, we report a study conducted in vivo with bacteria-carrying microdroplets to determine to what extent household textiles prevent contamination of GF mice in their environment. Using a recently validated spray-simulation method (mimicking a sneeze), herein we first determined that combed-cotton textiles used as two-layer-barriers covering the mouse cages prevented the contamination of all GF animals when sprayed 10–20 bacterial-droplet units/cm(2). In additional to exposure trials, the model showed that GF mice were again protected by the combed-cotton textile after the acute exposure to 10 times more droplets (20 “spray-sneezes”, ~200 bacterial-droplet units/cm(2)). Overall, two-layer combed-cotton protected 100% of the GF mice from bacteria-carrying droplets (n = 20 exposure-events), which was significantly superior compared to 100% mouse contamination without textile coverage or when 95% partly covered (n = 18, Fisher-exact, p < 0.0001). Of relevance is that two different densities of cotton were equally effective (100%) in preventing contamination regardless of density (120–vs. 200 g/m(2); T-test, p = 0.0028), suggesting that similar density materials could prevent droplet contamination. As a practical message, we conducted a speech trial (counting numbers, 1–100) with/without the protection of the same cotton textile used as face cover. The trial illustrated that contamination of surfaces occurs at a rate of >2–6 bacteria-carrying saliva-droplets per word (2.6 droplets/cm(2), 30 cm) when speaking at 60–70 decibels and that cotton face covers fully prevent bacterial surface contamination. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7479817/ /pubmed/32984381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00504 Text en Copyright © 2020 Rodriguez-Palacios, Conger and Cominelli. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Rodriguez-Palacios, Alex Conger, Mathew Cominelli, Fabio Germ-Free Mice Under Two-Layer Textiles Are Fully Protected From Bacteria in Sprayed Microdroplets: A Functional in vivo Test Method of Facemask/Filtration Materials |
title | Germ-Free Mice Under Two-Layer Textiles Are Fully Protected From Bacteria in Sprayed Microdroplets: A Functional in vivo Test Method of Facemask/Filtration Materials |
title_full | Germ-Free Mice Under Two-Layer Textiles Are Fully Protected From Bacteria in Sprayed Microdroplets: A Functional in vivo Test Method of Facemask/Filtration Materials |
title_fullStr | Germ-Free Mice Under Two-Layer Textiles Are Fully Protected From Bacteria in Sprayed Microdroplets: A Functional in vivo Test Method of Facemask/Filtration Materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Germ-Free Mice Under Two-Layer Textiles Are Fully Protected From Bacteria in Sprayed Microdroplets: A Functional in vivo Test Method of Facemask/Filtration Materials |
title_short | Germ-Free Mice Under Two-Layer Textiles Are Fully Protected From Bacteria in Sprayed Microdroplets: A Functional in vivo Test Method of Facemask/Filtration Materials |
title_sort | germ-free mice under two-layer textiles are fully protected from bacteria in sprayed microdroplets: a functional in vivo test method of facemask/filtration materials |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32984381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguezpalaciosalex germfreemiceundertwolayertextilesarefullyprotectedfrombacteriainsprayedmicrodropletsafunctionalinvivotestmethodoffacemaskfiltrationmaterials AT congermathew germfreemiceundertwolayertextilesarefullyprotectedfrombacteriainsprayedmicrodropletsafunctionalinvivotestmethodoffacemaskfiltrationmaterials AT cominellifabio germfreemiceundertwolayertextilesarefullyprotectedfrombacteriainsprayedmicrodropletsafunctionalinvivotestmethodoffacemaskfiltrationmaterials |