Cargando…
Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses
Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis is the main indication for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is now accepted that cementless implantation of the femoral component provides equivalent results to cemented one, however, the optimal fixation method of the tibial component remains controversial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
EDP Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32902376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020028 |
_version_ | 1783580377114214400 |
---|---|
author | Pacoret, Victor Kalk, Etienne Labattut, Ludovic Girardot, Guillaume Baulot, Emmanuel Martz, Pierre |
author_facet | Pacoret, Victor Kalk, Etienne Labattut, Ludovic Girardot, Guillaume Baulot, Emmanuel Martz, Pierre |
author_sort | Pacoret, Victor |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis is the main indication for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is now accepted that cementless implantation of the femoral component provides equivalent results to cemented one, however, the optimal fixation method of the tibial component remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship of cemented versus cementless tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty. Materials and methods: We carried out a retrospective, monocentric study, including 109 TKA (Zimmer(®) Natural Knee II ultra-congruent mobile-bearing) implanted between 2004 and 2010 for primary osteoarthritis, comparing 2 groups depending on tibial component fixation method, one cemented (n = 68) and one cementless (n = 41). Clinical (Knee Society Rating System (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, range of motion) and radiodiological outcomes were assessed at last follow-up with a minimal follow-up of 5 years. Results: Mean follow-up were 8.14 [5.31–12.7] and 8.06 [5.22–12.02] years, respectively, in cemented and cementless groups. The tibial component survival rate was 100% [95CI: 91.4–100] in the cementless group and 97.1% [95CI: 89.78–99.42] in the cemented group (2 aseptic loosenings) (p = 0.27). Radiolucent lines were present in 31.7% (n = 13) of the cementless and 44.1% (n = 30) of the cemented baseplates (p = 0.2). The postoperative KSS knee score was higher in the cementless group (99 ± 3 vs. 97 ± 7.5; p = 0.02), but there was no significant difference in KSS function, global KSS and HSS scores. Mean range of flexion was 120 ± 10° in the cementless group and 122.5 ± 15° in the cemented group (p = 0.37). No significant differences were found on the radiographic data or on complications. Conclusion: In this study, the survival rate of the tibial component is not influenced by its fixation method at a mean follow-up of 8 years in osteoarthritis, which confirms the reliability of cementless fixation in primary TKA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7480167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74801672020-09-15 Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses Pacoret, Victor Kalk, Etienne Labattut, Ludovic Girardot, Guillaume Baulot, Emmanuel Martz, Pierre SICOT J Original Article Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis is the main indication for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is now accepted that cementless implantation of the femoral component provides equivalent results to cemented one, however, the optimal fixation method of the tibial component remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship of cemented versus cementless tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty. Materials and methods: We carried out a retrospective, monocentric study, including 109 TKA (Zimmer(®) Natural Knee II ultra-congruent mobile-bearing) implanted between 2004 and 2010 for primary osteoarthritis, comparing 2 groups depending on tibial component fixation method, one cemented (n = 68) and one cementless (n = 41). Clinical (Knee Society Rating System (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, range of motion) and radiodiological outcomes were assessed at last follow-up with a minimal follow-up of 5 years. Results: Mean follow-up were 8.14 [5.31–12.7] and 8.06 [5.22–12.02] years, respectively, in cemented and cementless groups. The tibial component survival rate was 100% [95CI: 91.4–100] in the cementless group and 97.1% [95CI: 89.78–99.42] in the cemented group (2 aseptic loosenings) (p = 0.27). Radiolucent lines were present in 31.7% (n = 13) of the cementless and 44.1% (n = 30) of the cemented baseplates (p = 0.2). The postoperative KSS knee score was higher in the cementless group (99 ± 3 vs. 97 ± 7.5; p = 0.02), but there was no significant difference in KSS function, global KSS and HSS scores. Mean range of flexion was 120 ± 10° in the cementless group and 122.5 ± 15° in the cemented group (p = 0.37). No significant differences were found on the radiographic data or on complications. Conclusion: In this study, the survival rate of the tibial component is not influenced by its fixation method at a mean follow-up of 8 years in osteoarthritis, which confirms the reliability of cementless fixation in primary TKA. EDP Sciences 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7480167/ /pubmed/32902376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020028 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pacoret, Victor Kalk, Etienne Labattut, Ludovic Girardot, Guillaume Baulot, Emmanuel Martz, Pierre Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses |
title | Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses |
title_full | Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses |
title_fullStr | Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses |
title_short | Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses |
title_sort | survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32902376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pacoretvictor survivalrateofcementedversuscementlesstibialcomponentinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyover5yearsoffollowupcomparativestudyof109prostheses AT kalketienne survivalrateofcementedversuscementlesstibialcomponentinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyover5yearsoffollowupcomparativestudyof109prostheses AT labattutludovic survivalrateofcementedversuscementlesstibialcomponentinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyover5yearsoffollowupcomparativestudyof109prostheses AT girardotguillaume survivalrateofcementedversuscementlesstibialcomponentinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyover5yearsoffollowupcomparativestudyof109prostheses AT baulotemmanuel survivalrateofcementedversuscementlesstibialcomponentinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyover5yearsoffollowupcomparativestudyof109prostheses AT martzpierre survivalrateofcementedversuscementlesstibialcomponentinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyover5yearsoffollowupcomparativestudyof109prostheses |