Cargando…

Anosmia: an evolution of our understanding of its importance in COVID-19 and what questions remain to be answered

BACKGROUND: From the start of the pandemic, many European otolaryngologists observed an unprecendented number of anosmic patients. Early reports proposed that anosmia could be the first or even the only symptom of COVID-19 infection, prompting calls for self-isolation in affected patients. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saussez, Sven, Lechien, Jerome R., Hopkins, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32909060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06285-0
_version_ 1783580383656280064
author Saussez, Sven
Lechien, Jerome R.
Hopkins, Claire
author_facet Saussez, Sven
Lechien, Jerome R.
Hopkins, Claire
author_sort Saussez, Sven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: From the start of the pandemic, many European otolaryngologists observed an unprecendented number of anosmic patients. Early reports proposed that anosmia could be the first or even the only symptom of COVID-19 infection, prompting calls for self-isolation in affected patients. METHODS: In the present article, we review the COVID-19 anosmia literature and try to answer the following two questions: first, why is COVID-19 infection responsible for such a high incidence of anosmia? Second, in patients with more severe forms is anosmia really less prevalent and why? RESULTS: In terms of the etiology of olfactory dysfunction, several hypotheses were proposed at the outset of the pandemic; that olfactory cleft inflammation and obstruction caused a localized conductive loss, that there was injury to the sustentacular supporting cells in the olfactory epithelium or, given the known neurotropic potential of coronavirus, that the virus could invade and damage the olfactory bulb. Olfactory cleft obstruction may contribute to the olfactory dysfunction in some patients, perhaps most likely in those that show very early resolution, it cannot account for the loss in all patients. Moreover, disordered regrowth and a predominance of immature neurons have been shown to be associated with parosmia, which is a common finding amongst patients with Covid-related anosmia. A central mechanism therefore certainly seems to be consistent with the group of patients with more prolonged olfactory deficits. Sustentacular cells showing ACE-2 immunohistochemical expression 200 to 700 times greater than nasal or tracheal epithelia seem to be the main SARS-CoV-2 gateway. As the pathophysiology of COVID-19 anosmia seems to be better understood, the question of why patients with a moderate to severe form of COVID-19 infection have less olfactory involvement remains unresolved. Different potential explanations are discussed in this review. CONCLUSIONS: The last 5 months have benefited from great international collaborative research, first highlighting and then proving the value of loss of smell and taste as a symptom of COVID-19. Adoption of loss of smell into the case definition by international public health bodies will facilitate control of disease transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7480210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74802102020-09-09 Anosmia: an evolution of our understanding of its importance in COVID-19 and what questions remain to be answered Saussez, Sven Lechien, Jerome R. Hopkins, Claire Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Review Article BACKGROUND: From the start of the pandemic, many European otolaryngologists observed an unprecendented number of anosmic patients. Early reports proposed that anosmia could be the first or even the only symptom of COVID-19 infection, prompting calls for self-isolation in affected patients. METHODS: In the present article, we review the COVID-19 anosmia literature and try to answer the following two questions: first, why is COVID-19 infection responsible for such a high incidence of anosmia? Second, in patients with more severe forms is anosmia really less prevalent and why? RESULTS: In terms of the etiology of olfactory dysfunction, several hypotheses were proposed at the outset of the pandemic; that olfactory cleft inflammation and obstruction caused a localized conductive loss, that there was injury to the sustentacular supporting cells in the olfactory epithelium or, given the known neurotropic potential of coronavirus, that the virus could invade and damage the olfactory bulb. Olfactory cleft obstruction may contribute to the olfactory dysfunction in some patients, perhaps most likely in those that show very early resolution, it cannot account for the loss in all patients. Moreover, disordered regrowth and a predominance of immature neurons have been shown to be associated with parosmia, which is a common finding amongst patients with Covid-related anosmia. A central mechanism therefore certainly seems to be consistent with the group of patients with more prolonged olfactory deficits. Sustentacular cells showing ACE-2 immunohistochemical expression 200 to 700 times greater than nasal or tracheal epithelia seem to be the main SARS-CoV-2 gateway. As the pathophysiology of COVID-19 anosmia seems to be better understood, the question of why patients with a moderate to severe form of COVID-19 infection have less olfactory involvement remains unresolved. Different potential explanations are discussed in this review. CONCLUSIONS: The last 5 months have benefited from great international collaborative research, first highlighting and then proving the value of loss of smell and taste as a symptom of COVID-19. Adoption of loss of smell into the case definition by international public health bodies will facilitate control of disease transmission. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7480210/ /pubmed/32909060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06285-0 Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review Article
Saussez, Sven
Lechien, Jerome R.
Hopkins, Claire
Anosmia: an evolution of our understanding of its importance in COVID-19 and what questions remain to be answered
title Anosmia: an evolution of our understanding of its importance in COVID-19 and what questions remain to be answered
title_full Anosmia: an evolution of our understanding of its importance in COVID-19 and what questions remain to be answered
title_fullStr Anosmia: an evolution of our understanding of its importance in COVID-19 and what questions remain to be answered
title_full_unstemmed Anosmia: an evolution of our understanding of its importance in COVID-19 and what questions remain to be answered
title_short Anosmia: an evolution of our understanding of its importance in COVID-19 and what questions remain to be answered
title_sort anosmia: an evolution of our understanding of its importance in covid-19 and what questions remain to be answered
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32909060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06285-0
work_keys_str_mv AT saussezsven anosmiaanevolutionofourunderstandingofitsimportanceincovid19andwhatquestionsremaintobeanswered
AT lechienjeromer anosmiaanevolutionofourunderstandingofitsimportanceincovid19andwhatquestionsremaintobeanswered
AT hopkinsclaire anosmiaanevolutionofourunderstandingofitsimportanceincovid19andwhatquestionsremaintobeanswered