Cargando…

Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Rising health costs are challenging anesthesiologists to search for cost-effective anesthetic techniques. We conducted a study to estimate variable cost per case and cost of drug wastage as percentage of total drug cost associated with different modalities of general anesthesia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malhotra, Rohit, Kumar, Nishant, Jain, Aruna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013038
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_77_19
_version_ 1783580396002213888
author Malhotra, Rohit
Kumar, Nishant
Jain, Aruna
author_facet Malhotra, Rohit
Kumar, Nishant
Jain, Aruna
author_sort Malhotra, Rohit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Rising health costs are challenging anesthesiologists to search for cost-effective anesthetic techniques. We conducted a study to estimate variable cost per case and cost of drug wastage as percentage of total drug cost associated with different modalities of general anesthesia (GA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study was carried out after approval by institutional ethical committee in 258 adult patients aged 18–60 years of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, with a surgical duration of 1–4 hours, posted for elective surgery under GA with endotracheal intubation. At the end of surgery, total utilization of each drug, anesthetic gases, and consumables were noted and remaining drug was regarded as wastage. Cost was recorded as per maximum retail price for that particular brand in the market at start of study and total cost was calculated. For purpose of analysis, cases were divided into low flow sevoflurane, high flow sevoflurane, high flow isoflurane, low flow isoflurane, and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). RESULTS: The mean variable cost was highest with TIVA (₹2713.82 ± 509.57) and lowest with low flow isoflurane (₹1981.62 ± 335.03; P < 0.001). Drug wastage was 13.1% overall, with highest in low sevoflurane group and lowest in TIVA. CONCLUSION: Low flow anesthesia with isoflurane is more cost-effective as compared to high flow techniques and TIVA even for short duration surgeries. Rational use of drugs and consumables and minimizing wastage can further reduce anesthesia costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7480290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74802902020-10-02 Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia Malhotra, Rohit Kumar, Nishant Jain, Aruna J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Rising health costs are challenging anesthesiologists to search for cost-effective anesthetic techniques. We conducted a study to estimate variable cost per case and cost of drug wastage as percentage of total drug cost associated with different modalities of general anesthesia (GA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study was carried out after approval by institutional ethical committee in 258 adult patients aged 18–60 years of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, with a surgical duration of 1–4 hours, posted for elective surgery under GA with endotracheal intubation. At the end of surgery, total utilization of each drug, anesthetic gases, and consumables were noted and remaining drug was regarded as wastage. Cost was recorded as per maximum retail price for that particular brand in the market at start of study and total cost was calculated. For purpose of analysis, cases were divided into low flow sevoflurane, high flow sevoflurane, high flow isoflurane, low flow isoflurane, and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). RESULTS: The mean variable cost was highest with TIVA (₹2713.82 ± 509.57) and lowest with low flow isoflurane (₹1981.62 ± 335.03; P < 0.001). Drug wastage was 13.1% overall, with highest in low sevoflurane group and lowest in TIVA. CONCLUSION: Low flow anesthesia with isoflurane is more cost-effective as compared to high flow techniques and TIVA even for short duration surgeries. Rational use of drugs and consumables and minimizing wastage can further reduce anesthesia costs. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7480290/ /pubmed/33013038 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_77_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Malhotra, Rohit
Kumar, Nishant
Jain, Aruna
Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title_full Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title_fullStr Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title_short Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title_sort cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013038
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_77_19
work_keys_str_mv AT malhotrarohit costidentificationanalysisofgeneralanesthesia
AT kumarnishant costidentificationanalysisofgeneralanesthesia
AT jainaruna costidentificationanalysisofgeneralanesthesia