Cargando…
Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement
BACKGROUND: Improving facility-based quality for maternal and neonatal care is the key to reducing morbidity and mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries. Recent guidance from WHO and others has produced a large number of indicators to choose from to track quality. OBJECTIVE: To explore h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32657252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956 |
_version_ | 1783580416047841280 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Karen T. Hossain, Puspita Sarker, Malabika Montagu, Dominic Chakraborty, Nirali M. Sprockett, Andrea |
author_facet | Chang, Karen T. Hossain, Puspita Sarker, Malabika Montagu, Dominic Chakraborty, Nirali M. Sprockett, Andrea |
author_sort | Chang, Karen T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving facility-based quality for maternal and neonatal care is the key to reducing morbidity and mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries. Recent guidance from WHO and others has produced a large number of indicators to choose from to track quality. OBJECTIVE: To explore how to translate complex global maternal and neonatal health standards into actionable application at the facility level. METHODS: We applied a two-step process as an example of how the 352 indicators in WHO’s 2016 Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities might be reduced to only those with the strongest evidence base, associated with outcomes, and actionable by facility managers. We applied Hill criteria and assessed whether indicators were within the control of facility managers. We next conducted a rapid review of supporting literature and applied GRADE analysis, retaining those with scores of ‘moderate’ or ‘high’. To understand the utility and barriers to measuring this limited set of indicators in practice, we undertook a case study of hypothetical measurement application in two districts in Bangladesh, interviewing 25 clinicians, managers, and other stakeholders. RESULTS: From the initial 352 indicators, 56 were retained. The 56 indicators were used as a base for interviews. Respondents emphasized the practical challenges to the use of complex guides and the need for parsimonious and actionable sets of quality indicators. CONCLUSIONS: This work offers one way to move towards a reduced quality indicator set, beginning from current WHO guidance. Despite study limitations, this work provides evidence of the need for reduced and evidence-based sets of quality indicators if guides are to be used to improve quality in practice. We hope that future research will build on and refine our efforts. Measuring quality effectively so that evidence guides and improves practice is the first step to assuring safe maternal and neonatal care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7480423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74804232020-09-16 Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement Chang, Karen T. Hossain, Puspita Sarker, Malabika Montagu, Dominic Chakraborty, Nirali M. Sprockett, Andrea Glob Health Action Original Article BACKGROUND: Improving facility-based quality for maternal and neonatal care is the key to reducing morbidity and mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries. Recent guidance from WHO and others has produced a large number of indicators to choose from to track quality. OBJECTIVE: To explore how to translate complex global maternal and neonatal health standards into actionable application at the facility level. METHODS: We applied a two-step process as an example of how the 352 indicators in WHO’s 2016 Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities might be reduced to only those with the strongest evidence base, associated with outcomes, and actionable by facility managers. We applied Hill criteria and assessed whether indicators were within the control of facility managers. We next conducted a rapid review of supporting literature and applied GRADE analysis, retaining those with scores of ‘moderate’ or ‘high’. To understand the utility and barriers to measuring this limited set of indicators in practice, we undertook a case study of hypothetical measurement application in two districts in Bangladesh, interviewing 25 clinicians, managers, and other stakeholders. RESULTS: From the initial 352 indicators, 56 were retained. The 56 indicators were used as a base for interviews. Respondents emphasized the practical challenges to the use of complex guides and the need for parsimonious and actionable sets of quality indicators. CONCLUSIONS: This work offers one way to move towards a reduced quality indicator set, beginning from current WHO guidance. Despite study limitations, this work provides evidence of the need for reduced and evidence-based sets of quality indicators if guides are to be used to improve quality in practice. We hope that future research will build on and refine our efforts. Measuring quality effectively so that evidence guides and improves practice is the first step to assuring safe maternal and neonatal care. Taylor & Francis 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7480423/ /pubmed/32657252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chang, Karen T. Hossain, Puspita Sarker, Malabika Montagu, Dominic Chakraborty, Nirali M. Sprockett, Andrea Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement |
title | Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement |
title_full | Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement |
title_fullStr | Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement |
title_full_unstemmed | Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement |
title_short | Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement |
title_sort | translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32657252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changkarent translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement AT hossainpuspita translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement AT sarkermalabika translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement AT montagudominic translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement AT chakrabortyniralim translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement AT sprockettandrea translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement |