Cargando…

Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement

BACKGROUND: Improving facility-based quality for maternal and neonatal care is the key to reducing morbidity and mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries. Recent guidance from WHO and others has produced a large number of indicators to choose from to track quality. OBJECTIVE: To explore h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Karen T., Hossain, Puspita, Sarker, Malabika, Montagu, Dominic, Chakraborty, Nirali M., Sprockett, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32657252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956
_version_ 1783580416047841280
author Chang, Karen T.
Hossain, Puspita
Sarker, Malabika
Montagu, Dominic
Chakraborty, Nirali M.
Sprockett, Andrea
author_facet Chang, Karen T.
Hossain, Puspita
Sarker, Malabika
Montagu, Dominic
Chakraborty, Nirali M.
Sprockett, Andrea
author_sort Chang, Karen T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving facility-based quality for maternal and neonatal care is the key to reducing morbidity and mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries. Recent guidance from WHO and others has produced a large number of indicators to choose from to track quality. OBJECTIVE: To explore how to translate complex global maternal and neonatal health standards into actionable application at the facility level. METHODS: We applied a two-step process as an example of how the 352 indicators in WHO’s 2016 Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities might be reduced to only those with the strongest evidence base, associated with outcomes, and actionable by facility managers. We applied Hill criteria and assessed whether indicators were within the control of facility managers. We next conducted a rapid review of supporting literature and applied GRADE analysis, retaining those with scores of ‘moderate’ or ‘high’. To understand the utility and barriers to measuring this limited set of indicators in practice, we undertook a case study of hypothetical measurement application in two districts in Bangladesh, interviewing 25 clinicians, managers, and other stakeholders. RESULTS: From the initial 352 indicators, 56 were retained. The 56 indicators were used as a base for interviews. Respondents emphasized the practical challenges to the use of complex guides and the need for parsimonious and actionable sets of quality indicators. CONCLUSIONS: This work offers one way to move towards a reduced quality indicator set, beginning from current WHO guidance. Despite study limitations, this work provides evidence of the need for reduced and evidence-based sets of quality indicators if guides are to be used to improve quality in practice. We hope that future research will build on and refine our efforts. Measuring quality effectively so that evidence guides and improves practice is the first step to assuring safe maternal and neonatal care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7480423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74804232020-09-16 Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement Chang, Karen T. Hossain, Puspita Sarker, Malabika Montagu, Dominic Chakraborty, Nirali M. Sprockett, Andrea Glob Health Action Original Article BACKGROUND: Improving facility-based quality for maternal and neonatal care is the key to reducing morbidity and mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries. Recent guidance from WHO and others has produced a large number of indicators to choose from to track quality. OBJECTIVE: To explore how to translate complex global maternal and neonatal health standards into actionable application at the facility level. METHODS: We applied a two-step process as an example of how the 352 indicators in WHO’s 2016 Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities might be reduced to only those with the strongest evidence base, associated with outcomes, and actionable by facility managers. We applied Hill criteria and assessed whether indicators were within the control of facility managers. We next conducted a rapid review of supporting literature and applied GRADE analysis, retaining those with scores of ‘moderate’ or ‘high’. To understand the utility and barriers to measuring this limited set of indicators in practice, we undertook a case study of hypothetical measurement application in two districts in Bangladesh, interviewing 25 clinicians, managers, and other stakeholders. RESULTS: From the initial 352 indicators, 56 were retained. The 56 indicators were used as a base for interviews. Respondents emphasized the practical challenges to the use of complex guides and the need for parsimonious and actionable sets of quality indicators. CONCLUSIONS: This work offers one way to move towards a reduced quality indicator set, beginning from current WHO guidance. Despite study limitations, this work provides evidence of the need for reduced and evidence-based sets of quality indicators if guides are to be used to improve quality in practice. We hope that future research will build on and refine our efforts. Measuring quality effectively so that evidence guides and improves practice is the first step to assuring safe maternal and neonatal care. Taylor & Francis 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7480423/ /pubmed/32657252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chang, Karen T.
Hossain, Puspita
Sarker, Malabika
Montagu, Dominic
Chakraborty, Nirali M.
Sprockett, Andrea
Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement
title Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement
title_full Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement
title_fullStr Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement
title_full_unstemmed Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement
title_short Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement
title_sort translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32657252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956
work_keys_str_mv AT changkarent translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement
AT hossainpuspita translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement
AT sarkermalabika translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement
AT montagudominic translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement
AT chakrabortyniralim translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement
AT sprockettandrea translatinginternationalguidelinesforuseinroutinematernalandneonatalhealthcarequalitymeasurement