Cargando…

The evolution of minimally invasive tissue sampling in postmortem examination: a narrative review

BACKGROUND: Because of low acceptance rates and limited capacity, complete diagnostic autopsies (CDAs) are seldom conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There have been growing investments in less-invasive postmortem examination methodologies, including needle-based autopsy, known as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paganelli, Christina R., Goco, Norman J., McClure, Elizabeth M., Banke, Kathryn K., Blau, Dianna M., Breiman, Robert F., Menéndez, Clara, Rakislova, Natalia, Bassat, Quique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32713325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1792682
_version_ 1783580438605856768
author Paganelli, Christina R.
Goco, Norman J.
McClure, Elizabeth M.
Banke, Kathryn K.
Blau, Dianna M.
Breiman, Robert F.
Menéndez, Clara
Rakislova, Natalia
Bassat, Quique
author_facet Paganelli, Christina R.
Goco, Norman J.
McClure, Elizabeth M.
Banke, Kathryn K.
Blau, Dianna M.
Breiman, Robert F.
Menéndez, Clara
Rakislova, Natalia
Bassat, Quique
author_sort Paganelli, Christina R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Because of low acceptance rates and limited capacity, complete diagnostic autopsies (CDAs) are seldom conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There have been growing investments in less-invasive postmortem examination methodologies, including needle-based autopsy, known as minimally invasive autopsy or minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS). MITS has been shown to be a feasible and informative alternative to CDA for cause of death investigation and mortality surveillance purposes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this narrative review is to describe historical use and evolution of needle-based postmortem procedures as a tool to ascertain the cause of death, especially in LMICs. METHODS: Key word searches were conducted in PubMed and EBSCO in 2018 and 2019. Abstracts were reviewed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full publications were reviewed for those abstracts meeting inclusion criteria and a start set was established. A snowball search methodology was used and references for all publications meeting inclusion criteria were manually reviewed until saturation was reached. RESULTS: A total of 1,177 publications were initially screened. Following an iterative review of references, 79 publications were included in this review. Twenty-nine studies, published between 1955 and 2019, included MITS as part of postmortem examination. Of the publications included, 76% (60/79) have publication dates after 2010. More than 60% of all publications included addressed MITS in LMICs, and a total of nine publications compared MITS with CDA. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is evidence of less-invasive postmortem sampling starting in the 1800s, more structured needle-based postmortem examination publications started to appear in the mid-twentieth century. Early studies were mostly conducted in high-income countries but starting in 2010 the number of publications began to increase, and a growing number of studies were conducted in LMICs. Initial studies in LMICs were disease-specific but since 2015 have evolved to include more expansive postmortem examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7480574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74805742020-09-16 The evolution of minimally invasive tissue sampling in postmortem examination: a narrative review Paganelli, Christina R. Goco, Norman J. McClure, Elizabeth M. Banke, Kathryn K. Blau, Dianna M. Breiman, Robert F. Menéndez, Clara Rakislova, Natalia Bassat, Quique Glob Health Action Review Article BACKGROUND: Because of low acceptance rates and limited capacity, complete diagnostic autopsies (CDAs) are seldom conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There have been growing investments in less-invasive postmortem examination methodologies, including needle-based autopsy, known as minimally invasive autopsy or minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS). MITS has been shown to be a feasible and informative alternative to CDA for cause of death investigation and mortality surveillance purposes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this narrative review is to describe historical use and evolution of needle-based postmortem procedures as a tool to ascertain the cause of death, especially in LMICs. METHODS: Key word searches were conducted in PubMed and EBSCO in 2018 and 2019. Abstracts were reviewed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full publications were reviewed for those abstracts meeting inclusion criteria and a start set was established. A snowball search methodology was used and references for all publications meeting inclusion criteria were manually reviewed until saturation was reached. RESULTS: A total of 1,177 publications were initially screened. Following an iterative review of references, 79 publications were included in this review. Twenty-nine studies, published between 1955 and 2019, included MITS as part of postmortem examination. Of the publications included, 76% (60/79) have publication dates after 2010. More than 60% of all publications included addressed MITS in LMICs, and a total of nine publications compared MITS with CDA. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is evidence of less-invasive postmortem sampling starting in the 1800s, more structured needle-based postmortem examination publications started to appear in the mid-twentieth century. Early studies were mostly conducted in high-income countries but starting in 2010 the number of publications began to increase, and a growing number of studies were conducted in LMICs. Initial studies in LMICs were disease-specific but since 2015 have evolved to include more expansive postmortem examination. Taylor & Francis 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7480574/ /pubmed/32713325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1792682 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Paganelli, Christina R.
Goco, Norman J.
McClure, Elizabeth M.
Banke, Kathryn K.
Blau, Dianna M.
Breiman, Robert F.
Menéndez, Clara
Rakislova, Natalia
Bassat, Quique
The evolution of minimally invasive tissue sampling in postmortem examination: a narrative review
title The evolution of minimally invasive tissue sampling in postmortem examination: a narrative review
title_full The evolution of minimally invasive tissue sampling in postmortem examination: a narrative review
title_fullStr The evolution of minimally invasive tissue sampling in postmortem examination: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of minimally invasive tissue sampling in postmortem examination: a narrative review
title_short The evolution of minimally invasive tissue sampling in postmortem examination: a narrative review
title_sort evolution of minimally invasive tissue sampling in postmortem examination: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32713325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1792682
work_keys_str_mv AT paganellichristinar theevolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT goconormanj theevolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT mcclureelizabethm theevolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT bankekathrynk theevolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT blaudiannam theevolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT breimanrobertf theevolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT menendezclara theevolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT rakislovanatalia theevolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT bassatquique theevolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT paganellichristinar evolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT goconormanj evolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT mcclureelizabethm evolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT bankekathrynk evolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT blaudiannam evolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT breimanrobertf evolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT menendezclara evolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT rakislovanatalia evolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview
AT bassatquique evolutionofminimallyinvasivetissuesamplinginpostmortemexaminationanarrativereview