Cargando…
Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment
INTRODUCTION: Limited comparative effectiveness data for rituximab (RTX) versus natalizumab (NTZ), fingolimod (FTY), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) exist. METHODS: Clinician‐reported data on patients prescribed RTX, NTZ, FTY, or DMF for the treatment of MS a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32767538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51111 |
_version_ | 1783580498865422336 |
---|---|
author | Vollmer, Brandi L. Nair, Kavita Sillau, Stefan Corboy, John R. Vollmer, Timothy Alvarez, Enrique |
author_facet | Vollmer, Brandi L. Nair, Kavita Sillau, Stefan Corboy, John R. Vollmer, Timothy Alvarez, Enrique |
author_sort | Vollmer, Brandi L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Limited comparative effectiveness data for rituximab (RTX) versus natalizumab (NTZ), fingolimod (FTY), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) exist. METHODS: Clinician‐reported data on patients prescribed RTX, NTZ, FTY, or DMF for the treatment of MS at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at the University of Colorado were retrospectively collected. Outcomes included a composite effectiveness measure consisting of clinical relapse, contrast‐enhancing lesions, and/or new T2 lesions, individual effectiveness outcomes, and discontinuation. Logistic regression was used on patients matched by propensity scores and using average treatment effect on treated doubly robust weighting estimator. RESULTS: A total of 182, 451, 271, and 342 patients initiated RTX, NTZ, FTY, and DMF and were followed for 2 years. Before and after adjustment, the odds of experiencing disease activity was significantly higher for FTY [adjusted OR (aOR) = 3.17 (95% CI: 1.81–5.55), P < 0.001].and DMF [aOR = 2.68 (95% CI:1.67–4.29), P < 0.001], and similar for NTZ [aOR = 1.36 (95% CI:0.83–2.23), P = 0.216] versus RTX. When examining months 6–24, NTZ demonstrated higher odds of disease activity compared to RTX [aOR = 2.21 (95% CI: 1.20–4.06), P = 0.007]. Similar odds of discontinuation were seen between NTZ and RTX [aOR = 1.39 (95% CI: 0.88–2.20), P = 0.157]; however, FTY [aOR = 2.02 (95% CI: 1.24–3.30), P = 0.005] and DMF [aOR = 3.27 (95% CI: 2.15–4.97), P < 0.001] had greater odds of discontinuation than RTX. INTERPRETATION: RTX demonstrated superior effectiveness and discontinuation outcomes compared to FTY and DMF. Although RTX demonstrated similar effectiveness and discontinuation compared to NTZ, RTX had superior effectiveness during months 6–24 and fewer discontinuations when excluding discontinuations due to insurance issues. Results suggest superiority of RTX in reducing disease activity and maintaining long‐term treatment in a real‐world MS cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7480919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74809192020-09-16 Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment Vollmer, Brandi L. Nair, Kavita Sillau, Stefan Corboy, John R. Vollmer, Timothy Alvarez, Enrique Ann Clin Transl Neurol Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Limited comparative effectiveness data for rituximab (RTX) versus natalizumab (NTZ), fingolimod (FTY), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) exist. METHODS: Clinician‐reported data on patients prescribed RTX, NTZ, FTY, or DMF for the treatment of MS at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at the University of Colorado were retrospectively collected. Outcomes included a composite effectiveness measure consisting of clinical relapse, contrast‐enhancing lesions, and/or new T2 lesions, individual effectiveness outcomes, and discontinuation. Logistic regression was used on patients matched by propensity scores and using average treatment effect on treated doubly robust weighting estimator. RESULTS: A total of 182, 451, 271, and 342 patients initiated RTX, NTZ, FTY, and DMF and were followed for 2 years. Before and after adjustment, the odds of experiencing disease activity was significantly higher for FTY [adjusted OR (aOR) = 3.17 (95% CI: 1.81–5.55), P < 0.001].and DMF [aOR = 2.68 (95% CI:1.67–4.29), P < 0.001], and similar for NTZ [aOR = 1.36 (95% CI:0.83–2.23), P = 0.216] versus RTX. When examining months 6–24, NTZ demonstrated higher odds of disease activity compared to RTX [aOR = 2.21 (95% CI: 1.20–4.06), P = 0.007]. Similar odds of discontinuation were seen between NTZ and RTX [aOR = 1.39 (95% CI: 0.88–2.20), P = 0.157]; however, FTY [aOR = 2.02 (95% CI: 1.24–3.30), P = 0.005] and DMF [aOR = 3.27 (95% CI: 2.15–4.97), P < 0.001] had greater odds of discontinuation than RTX. INTERPRETATION: RTX demonstrated superior effectiveness and discontinuation outcomes compared to FTY and DMF. Although RTX demonstrated similar effectiveness and discontinuation compared to NTZ, RTX had superior effectiveness during months 6–24 and fewer discontinuations when excluding discontinuations due to insurance issues. Results suggest superiority of RTX in reducing disease activity and maintaining long‐term treatment in a real‐world MS cohort. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7480919/ /pubmed/32767538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51111 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Vollmer, Brandi L. Nair, Kavita Sillau, Stefan Corboy, John R. Vollmer, Timothy Alvarez, Enrique Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment |
title | Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment |
title_full | Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment |
title_fullStr | Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment |
title_short | Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment |
title_sort | rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7480919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32767538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vollmerbrandil rituximabversusnatalizumabfingolimodanddimethylfumarateinmultiplesclerosistreatment AT nairkavita rituximabversusnatalizumabfingolimodanddimethylfumarateinmultiplesclerosistreatment AT sillaustefan rituximabversusnatalizumabfingolimodanddimethylfumarateinmultiplesclerosistreatment AT corboyjohnr rituximabversusnatalizumabfingolimodanddimethylfumarateinmultiplesclerosistreatment AT vollmertimothy rituximabversusnatalizumabfingolimodanddimethylfumarateinmultiplesclerosistreatment AT alvarezenrique rituximabversusnatalizumabfingolimodanddimethylfumarateinmultiplesclerosistreatment |