Cargando…
Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty
BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) remains a treatment option for the selected patients with severe aortic stenosis. We examined clinical outcomes and predictors of prognosis in patients undergoing BAV for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: We identified all patients undergoing BAV from Ja...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2020-001330 |
_version_ | 1783580528338796544 |
---|---|
author | Bularga, Anda Bing, Rong Shah, Anoop SV Adamson, Philip D Behan, Miles Newby, David E Flapan, Andrew Uren, Neal Cruden, Nick |
author_facet | Bularga, Anda Bing, Rong Shah, Anoop SV Adamson, Philip D Behan, Miles Newby, David E Flapan, Andrew Uren, Neal Cruden, Nick |
author_sort | Bularga, Anda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) remains a treatment option for the selected patients with severe aortic stenosis. We examined clinical outcomes and predictors of prognosis in patients undergoing BAV for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: We identified all patients undergoing BAV from January 2010 to March 2018 (n=167) at a single transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centre. Patient demographics, investigations, subsequent interventions and clinical outcomes were obtained from electronic health records. RESULTS: Patients undergoing BAV were elderly (median age 80, IQR 73–86 years) and half (n=87, 52%) were male. All-cause mortality at 30 days and 12 months was 11% and 43%, respectively. Reduce ejection fraction (EF 30%–50%: HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.94; EF <30%: HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.20) was the only independent predictor at baseline of overall mortality. Median survival was 212 (IQR 54–490) days from the index procedure. Mortality at 1 year was lowest in patients who subsequently underwent TAVI or SAVR but high among those who had no further interventions or those who had a repeat BAV (14%, 19%, 60%, 89% respectively, log-rank p<0.001). CONCLUSION: BAV as a bridge to definitive aortic valve intervention in carefully selected patients offers acceptable outcomes. These contemporary observational findings demonstrate the ongoing potential utility of BAV in the TAVI era. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7481086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74810862020-09-18 Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty Bularga, Anda Bing, Rong Shah, Anoop SV Adamson, Philip D Behan, Miles Newby, David E Flapan, Andrew Uren, Neal Cruden, Nick Open Heart Valvular Heart Disease BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) remains a treatment option for the selected patients with severe aortic stenosis. We examined clinical outcomes and predictors of prognosis in patients undergoing BAV for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: We identified all patients undergoing BAV from January 2010 to March 2018 (n=167) at a single transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centre. Patient demographics, investigations, subsequent interventions and clinical outcomes were obtained from electronic health records. RESULTS: Patients undergoing BAV were elderly (median age 80, IQR 73–86 years) and half (n=87, 52%) were male. All-cause mortality at 30 days and 12 months was 11% and 43%, respectively. Reduce ejection fraction (EF 30%–50%: HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.94; EF <30%: HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.20) was the only independent predictor at baseline of overall mortality. Median survival was 212 (IQR 54–490) days from the index procedure. Mortality at 1 year was lowest in patients who subsequently underwent TAVI or SAVR but high among those who had no further interventions or those who had a repeat BAV (14%, 19%, 60%, 89% respectively, log-rank p<0.001). CONCLUSION: BAV as a bridge to definitive aortic valve intervention in carefully selected patients offers acceptable outcomes. These contemporary observational findings demonstrate the ongoing potential utility of BAV in the TAVI era. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7481086/ /pubmed/32907920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2020-001330 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Valvular Heart Disease Bularga, Anda Bing, Rong Shah, Anoop SV Adamson, Philip D Behan, Miles Newby, David E Flapan, Andrew Uren, Neal Cruden, Nick Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty |
title | Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty |
title_full | Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty |
title_short | Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty |
title_sort | clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty |
topic | Valvular Heart Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2020-001330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bulargaanda clinicaloutcomesfollowingballoonaorticvalvuloplasty AT bingrong clinicaloutcomesfollowingballoonaorticvalvuloplasty AT shahanoopsv clinicaloutcomesfollowingballoonaorticvalvuloplasty AT adamsonphilipd clinicaloutcomesfollowingballoonaorticvalvuloplasty AT behanmiles clinicaloutcomesfollowingballoonaorticvalvuloplasty AT newbydavide clinicaloutcomesfollowingballoonaorticvalvuloplasty AT flapanandrew clinicaloutcomesfollowingballoonaorticvalvuloplasty AT urenneal clinicaloutcomesfollowingballoonaorticvalvuloplasty AT crudennick clinicaloutcomesfollowingballoonaorticvalvuloplasty |