Cargando…

Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation

Forensic science is currently undergoing a transformation and expansion to include modern types of evidence, such as evidence generated by digital investigations. This development is said to raise a series of challenges, both in operational and conceptual dimensions. This paper reviews and discusses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biedermann, Alex, Kotsoglou, Kyriakos N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.004
_version_ 1783580533233549312
author Biedermann, Alex
Kotsoglou, Kyriakos N.
author_facet Biedermann, Alex
Kotsoglou, Kyriakos N.
author_sort Biedermann, Alex
collection PubMed
description Forensic science is currently undergoing a transformation and expansion to include modern types of evidence, such as evidence generated by digital investigations. This development is said to raise a series of challenges, both in operational and conceptual dimensions. This paper reviews and discusses a series of convoluted conceptual hurdles that are encountered in connection with the use of digital evidence as part of evidence and proof processes at trial, in contradistinction to investigative uses of such types of evidence. As a recent example raising such hurdles, we analyse and discuss assertions and proposals made in the article “Digital Evidence Certainty Descriptors (DECDs)” by Graeme Horsman (32 Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation (2020) 200896).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7481130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74811302020-09-16 Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation Biedermann, Alex Kotsoglou, Kyriakos N. Forensic Sci Int Synerg Interdisciplinary Forensics Forensic science is currently undergoing a transformation and expansion to include modern types of evidence, such as evidence generated by digital investigations. This development is said to raise a series of challenges, both in operational and conceptual dimensions. This paper reviews and discusses a series of convoluted conceptual hurdles that are encountered in connection with the use of digital evidence as part of evidence and proof processes at trial, in contradistinction to investigative uses of such types of evidence. As a recent example raising such hurdles, we analyse and discuss assertions and proposals made in the article “Digital Evidence Certainty Descriptors (DECDs)” by Graeme Horsman (32 Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation (2020) 200896). Elsevier 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7481130/ /pubmed/32944711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.004 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Interdisciplinary Forensics
Biedermann, Alex
Kotsoglou, Kyriakos N.
Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation
title Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation
title_full Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation
title_fullStr Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation
title_full_unstemmed Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation
title_short Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation
title_sort digital evidence exceptionalism? a review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation
topic Interdisciplinary Forensics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.004
work_keys_str_mv AT biedermannalex digitalevidenceexceptionalismareviewanddiscussionofconceptualhurdlesindigitalevidencetransformation
AT kotsogloukyriakosn digitalevidenceexceptionalismareviewanddiscussionofconceptualhurdlesindigitalevidencetransformation