Cargando…
Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective
Ground glass and part-solid nodules, collectively referred to as subsolid nodules, present a challenge in management, with a high risk of malignancy but, when malignant, demonstrating indolent behavior. Emerging data suggest longer follow-up intervals and shorter duration of follow-up is likely appr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100267 |
_version_ | 1783580534239133696 |
---|---|
author | Hammer, Mark M. Hatabu, Hiroto |
author_facet | Hammer, Mark M. Hatabu, Hiroto |
author_sort | Hammer, Mark M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ground glass and part-solid nodules, collectively referred to as subsolid nodules, present a challenge in management, with a high risk of malignancy but, when malignant, demonstrating indolent behavior. Emerging data suggest longer follow-up intervals and shorter duration of follow-up is likely appropriate in these nodules. Additionally, definitive therapy is shifting to less aggressive approaches such as sub-lobar resection. Patients may benefit from individualized approaches, incorporating both patient and imaging features to determine whether treatment is necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7481135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74811352020-09-16 Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective Hammer, Mark M. Hatabu, Hiroto Eur J Radiol Open Article Ground glass and part-solid nodules, collectively referred to as subsolid nodules, present a challenge in management, with a high risk of malignancy but, when malignant, demonstrating indolent behavior. Emerging data suggest longer follow-up intervals and shorter duration of follow-up is likely appropriate in these nodules. Additionally, definitive therapy is shifting to less aggressive approaches such as sub-lobar resection. Patients may benefit from individualized approaches, incorporating both patient and imaging features to determine whether treatment is necessary. Elsevier 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7481135/ /pubmed/32944597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100267 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hammer, Mark M. Hatabu, Hiroto Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective |
title | Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective |
title_full | Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective |
title_fullStr | Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective |
title_short | Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective |
title_sort | subsolid pulmonary nodules: controversy and perspective |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100267 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hammermarkm subsolidpulmonarynodulescontroversyandperspective AT hatabuhiroto subsolidpulmonarynodulescontroversyandperspective |