Cargando…

Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective

Ground glass and part-solid nodules, collectively referred to as subsolid nodules, present a challenge in management, with a high risk of malignancy but, when malignant, demonstrating indolent behavior. Emerging data suggest longer follow-up intervals and shorter duration of follow-up is likely appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammer, Mark M., Hatabu, Hiroto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100267
_version_ 1783580534239133696
author Hammer, Mark M.
Hatabu, Hiroto
author_facet Hammer, Mark M.
Hatabu, Hiroto
author_sort Hammer, Mark M.
collection PubMed
description Ground glass and part-solid nodules, collectively referred to as subsolid nodules, present a challenge in management, with a high risk of malignancy but, when malignant, demonstrating indolent behavior. Emerging data suggest longer follow-up intervals and shorter duration of follow-up is likely appropriate in these nodules. Additionally, definitive therapy is shifting to less aggressive approaches such as sub-lobar resection. Patients may benefit from individualized approaches, incorporating both patient and imaging features to determine whether treatment is necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7481135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74811352020-09-16 Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective Hammer, Mark M. Hatabu, Hiroto Eur J Radiol Open Article Ground glass and part-solid nodules, collectively referred to as subsolid nodules, present a challenge in management, with a high risk of malignancy but, when malignant, demonstrating indolent behavior. Emerging data suggest longer follow-up intervals and shorter duration of follow-up is likely appropriate in these nodules. Additionally, definitive therapy is shifting to less aggressive approaches such as sub-lobar resection. Patients may benefit from individualized approaches, incorporating both patient and imaging features to determine whether treatment is necessary. Elsevier 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7481135/ /pubmed/32944597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100267 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hammer, Mark M.
Hatabu, Hiroto
Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective
title Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective
title_full Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective
title_fullStr Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective
title_full_unstemmed Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective
title_short Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective
title_sort subsolid pulmonary nodules: controversy and perspective
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100267
work_keys_str_mv AT hammermarkm subsolidpulmonarynodulescontroversyandperspective
AT hatabuhiroto subsolidpulmonarynodulescontroversyandperspective