Cargando…

The prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, at least 12 lymph nodes are required to accurately stage locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) reduces the number of lymph nodes retrieved during surgery. In this study, we evaluated the effect of NACRT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li Destri, Giovanni, Maugeri, Andrea, Ramistella, Alice, La Greca, Gaetano, Conti, Pietro, Trombatore, Giovanni, Vecchio, Giada Maria, Magro, Gaetano Giuseppe, Barchitta, Martina, Agodi, Antonella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00841-3
_version_ 1783580536932925440
author Li Destri, Giovanni
Maugeri, Andrea
Ramistella, Alice
La Greca, Gaetano
Conti, Pietro
Trombatore, Giovanni
Vecchio, Giada Maria
Magro, Gaetano Giuseppe
Barchitta, Martina
Agodi, Antonella
author_facet Li Destri, Giovanni
Maugeri, Andrea
Ramistella, Alice
La Greca, Gaetano
Conti, Pietro
Trombatore, Giovanni
Vecchio, Giada Maria
Magro, Gaetano Giuseppe
Barchitta, Martina
Agodi, Antonella
author_sort Li Destri, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, at least 12 lymph nodes are required to accurately stage locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) reduces the number of lymph nodes retrieved during surgery. In this study, we evaluated the effect of NACRT on lymph node retrieval and prognosis in patients with LARC. We performed an observational study of 142 patients with LARC. Although our analysis was retrospective, data were collected prospectively. Half the patients were treated with NACRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) and the other half underwent TME only. The number of lymph nodes retrieved and the number of metastatic lymph nodes were significantly reduced in the NACRT group (P > 0.001). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, only NACRT and patient age were significantly associated with reduced lymph node retrieval. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio (LNR) both had a significant effect on prognosis when the patient population was examined as a whole (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001, respectively). However, the LNR was the only significant, independent prognostic factor in both treatment groups (P = 0.007 for the NACRT group; P = 0.04 for the no-NACRT group). NACRT improves patient prognosis only when the number of metastatic lymph nodes is reduced. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the LNR are important prognostic factors. Lymph node retrieval remains an indispensable tool for staging and prognostic assessment of patients with rectal carcinoma treated with NACRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7481149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74811492020-09-21 The prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer Li Destri, Giovanni Maugeri, Andrea Ramistella, Alice La Greca, Gaetano Conti, Pietro Trombatore, Giovanni Vecchio, Giada Maria Magro, Gaetano Giuseppe Barchitta, Martina Agodi, Antonella Updates Surg Original Article According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, at least 12 lymph nodes are required to accurately stage locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) reduces the number of lymph nodes retrieved during surgery. In this study, we evaluated the effect of NACRT on lymph node retrieval and prognosis in patients with LARC. We performed an observational study of 142 patients with LARC. Although our analysis was retrospective, data were collected prospectively. Half the patients were treated with NACRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) and the other half underwent TME only. The number of lymph nodes retrieved and the number of metastatic lymph nodes were significantly reduced in the NACRT group (P > 0.001). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, only NACRT and patient age were significantly associated with reduced lymph node retrieval. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio (LNR) both had a significant effect on prognosis when the patient population was examined as a whole (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001, respectively). However, the LNR was the only significant, independent prognostic factor in both treatment groups (P = 0.007 for the NACRT group; P = 0.04 for the no-NACRT group). NACRT improves patient prognosis only when the number of metastatic lymph nodes is reduced. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the LNR are important prognostic factors. Lymph node retrieval remains an indispensable tool for staging and prognostic assessment of patients with rectal carcinoma treated with NACRT. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7481149/ /pubmed/32632764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00841-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Li Destri, Giovanni
Maugeri, Andrea
Ramistella, Alice
La Greca, Gaetano
Conti, Pietro
Trombatore, Giovanni
Vecchio, Giada Maria
Magro, Gaetano Giuseppe
Barchitta, Martina
Agodi, Antonella
The prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
title The prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
title_full The prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
title_fullStr The prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
title_short The prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
title_sort prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00841-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lidestrigiovanni theprognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT maugeriandrea theprognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT ramistellaalice theprognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT lagrecagaetano theprognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT contipietro theprognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT trombatoregiovanni theprognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT vecchiogiadamaria theprognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT magrogaetanogiuseppe theprognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT barchittamartina theprognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT agodiantonella theprognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT lidestrigiovanni prognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT maugeriandrea prognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT ramistellaalice prognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT lagrecagaetano prognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT contipietro prognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT trombatoregiovanni prognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT vecchiogiadamaria prognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT magrogaetanogiuseppe prognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT barchittamartina prognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT agodiantonella prognosticimpactofneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyonlymphnodesamplinginpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer