Cargando…
Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation
PURPOSE: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is used for detection of chronic kidney disease and drug dose adjustment. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of freely availabl...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32562002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02932-x |
_version_ | 1783580538635812864 |
---|---|
author | Seiberth, Sarah Terstegen, Theresa Strobach, Dorothea Czock, David |
author_facet | Seiberth, Sarah Terstegen, Theresa Strobach, Dorothea Czock, David |
author_sort | Seiberth, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is used for detection of chronic kidney disease and drug dose adjustment. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of freely available eGFR online calculators. METHODS: All identified CKD-EPI online calculators were run with five reference cases differing in age, sex, serum creatinine, and ethnicity. Conversion from eGFR(indexed) (unit ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) to eGFR(non-indexed) (unit ml/min) and creatinine unit from milligramme/decilitre to micromole/litre was checked, if available. RESULTS: Only 36 of 47 calculators (76.6%) produced accurate eGFR results for all reference cases. Eight of 47 (17.0%) calculators were considered as faulty because of errors relating to ethnicity (4 calculators), to conversion of the eGFR unit (2 calculators), to erroneous eGFR values without obvious explanation (2 calculators), to conversion of the creatinine unit (1 calculator), and to an error in the eGFR unit displayed (1 calculator). Overall, 28 errors were found (range 59 to 147% of the correct eGFR value), the majority concerning calculation of eGFR(indexed) and the conversion to eGFR(non-indexed). Only 7 of 47 (14.9%) calculators offered conversion of the eGFR unit. CONCLUSIONS: Erroneous calculations that might lead to inappropriate clinical decision-making were found in 8 of 47 calculators. Thus, online calculators should be evaluated more thoroughly after implementation. Conversion of eGFR units that might be needed for drug dose adjustments should be implemented more often. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02932-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7481157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74811572020-09-21 Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation Seiberth, Sarah Terstegen, Theresa Strobach, Dorothea Czock, David Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription PURPOSE: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is used for detection of chronic kidney disease and drug dose adjustment. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of freely available eGFR online calculators. METHODS: All identified CKD-EPI online calculators were run with five reference cases differing in age, sex, serum creatinine, and ethnicity. Conversion from eGFR(indexed) (unit ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) to eGFR(non-indexed) (unit ml/min) and creatinine unit from milligramme/decilitre to micromole/litre was checked, if available. RESULTS: Only 36 of 47 calculators (76.6%) produced accurate eGFR results for all reference cases. Eight of 47 (17.0%) calculators were considered as faulty because of errors relating to ethnicity (4 calculators), to conversion of the eGFR unit (2 calculators), to erroneous eGFR values without obvious explanation (2 calculators), to conversion of the creatinine unit (1 calculator), and to an error in the eGFR unit displayed (1 calculator). Overall, 28 errors were found (range 59 to 147% of the correct eGFR value), the majority concerning calculation of eGFR(indexed) and the conversion to eGFR(non-indexed). Only 7 of 47 (14.9%) calculators offered conversion of the eGFR unit. CONCLUSIONS: Erroneous calculations that might lead to inappropriate clinical decision-making were found in 8 of 47 calculators. Thus, online calculators should be evaluated more thoroughly after implementation. Conversion of eGFR units that might be needed for drug dose adjustments should be implemented more often. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02932-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-19 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7481157/ /pubmed/32562002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02932-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription Seiberth, Sarah Terstegen, Theresa Strobach, Dorothea Czock, David Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation |
title | Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation |
title_full | Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation |
title_short | Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation |
title_sort | accuracy of freely available online gfr calculators using the ckd-epi equation |
topic | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32562002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02932-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seiberthsarah accuracyoffreelyavailableonlinegfrcalculatorsusingtheckdepiequation AT terstegentheresa accuracyoffreelyavailableonlinegfrcalculatorsusingtheckdepiequation AT strobachdorothea accuracyoffreelyavailableonlinegfrcalculatorsusingtheckdepiequation AT czockdavid accuracyoffreelyavailableonlinegfrcalculatorsusingtheckdepiequation |