Cargando…

Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation

PURPOSE: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is used for detection of chronic kidney disease and drug dose adjustment. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of freely availabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seiberth, Sarah, Terstegen, Theresa, Strobach, Dorothea, Czock, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32562002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02932-x
_version_ 1783580538635812864
author Seiberth, Sarah
Terstegen, Theresa
Strobach, Dorothea
Czock, David
author_facet Seiberth, Sarah
Terstegen, Theresa
Strobach, Dorothea
Czock, David
author_sort Seiberth, Sarah
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is used for detection of chronic kidney disease and drug dose adjustment. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of freely available eGFR online calculators. METHODS: All identified CKD-EPI online calculators were run with five reference cases differing in age, sex, serum creatinine, and ethnicity. Conversion from eGFR(indexed) (unit ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) to eGFR(non-indexed) (unit ml/min) and creatinine unit from milligramme/decilitre to micromole/litre was checked, if available. RESULTS: Only 36 of 47 calculators (76.6%) produced accurate eGFR results for all reference cases. Eight of 47 (17.0%) calculators were considered as faulty because of errors relating to ethnicity (4 calculators), to conversion of the eGFR unit (2 calculators), to erroneous eGFR values without obvious explanation (2 calculators), to conversion of the creatinine unit (1 calculator), and to an error in the eGFR unit displayed (1 calculator). Overall, 28 errors were found (range 59 to 147% of the correct eGFR value), the majority concerning calculation of eGFR(indexed) and the conversion to eGFR(non-indexed). Only 7 of 47 (14.9%) calculators offered conversion of the eGFR unit. CONCLUSIONS: Erroneous calculations that might lead to inappropriate clinical decision-making were found in 8 of 47 calculators. Thus, online calculators should be evaluated more thoroughly after implementation. Conversion of eGFR units that might be needed for drug dose adjustments should be implemented more often. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02932-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7481157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74811572020-09-21 Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation Seiberth, Sarah Terstegen, Theresa Strobach, Dorothea Czock, David Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription PURPOSE: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is used for detection of chronic kidney disease and drug dose adjustment. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of freely available eGFR online calculators. METHODS: All identified CKD-EPI online calculators were run with five reference cases differing in age, sex, serum creatinine, and ethnicity. Conversion from eGFR(indexed) (unit ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) to eGFR(non-indexed) (unit ml/min) and creatinine unit from milligramme/decilitre to micromole/litre was checked, if available. RESULTS: Only 36 of 47 calculators (76.6%) produced accurate eGFR results for all reference cases. Eight of 47 (17.0%) calculators were considered as faulty because of errors relating to ethnicity (4 calculators), to conversion of the eGFR unit (2 calculators), to erroneous eGFR values without obvious explanation (2 calculators), to conversion of the creatinine unit (1 calculator), and to an error in the eGFR unit displayed (1 calculator). Overall, 28 errors were found (range 59 to 147% of the correct eGFR value), the majority concerning calculation of eGFR(indexed) and the conversion to eGFR(non-indexed). Only 7 of 47 (14.9%) calculators offered conversion of the eGFR unit. CONCLUSIONS: Erroneous calculations that might lead to inappropriate clinical decision-making were found in 8 of 47 calculators. Thus, online calculators should be evaluated more thoroughly after implementation. Conversion of eGFR units that might be needed for drug dose adjustments should be implemented more often. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02932-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-19 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7481157/ /pubmed/32562002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02932-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
Seiberth, Sarah
Terstegen, Theresa
Strobach, Dorothea
Czock, David
Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation
title Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation
title_full Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation
title_fullStr Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation
title_short Accuracy of freely available online GFR calculators using the CKD-EPI equation
title_sort accuracy of freely available online gfr calculators using the ckd-epi equation
topic Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32562002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02932-x
work_keys_str_mv AT seiberthsarah accuracyoffreelyavailableonlinegfrcalculatorsusingtheckdepiequation
AT terstegentheresa accuracyoffreelyavailableonlinegfrcalculatorsusingtheckdepiequation
AT strobachdorothea accuracyoffreelyavailableonlinegfrcalculatorsusingtheckdepiequation
AT czockdavid accuracyoffreelyavailableonlinegfrcalculatorsusingtheckdepiequation