Cargando…

The Neurophysiological Responses of Concussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated neurophysiological responses using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) following a concussion or sub-concussion. Methods: A systematic searching of relevant databases for peer-reviewed literature quantifying motor evoked potentials from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Emily, Kidgell, Dawson J., Frazer, Ashlyn K., Pearce, Alan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192374
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00306
_version_ 1783580592473899008
author Scott, Emily
Kidgell, Dawson J.
Frazer, Ashlyn K.
Pearce, Alan J.
author_facet Scott, Emily
Kidgell, Dawson J.
Frazer, Ashlyn K.
Pearce, Alan J.
author_sort Scott, Emily
collection PubMed
description Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated neurophysiological responses using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) following a concussion or sub-concussion. Methods: A systematic searching of relevant databases for peer-reviewed literature quantifying motor evoked potentials from TMS between 1999 and 2019 was performed. A meta-analysis quantified pooled data for measures including motor threshold, motor latency, and motor evoked potential amplitude and for inhibitory measures such as cortical silent period duration, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) ratios. Results: Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were arbitrarily classified into the groups, based on time post-concussion, “acute” (subjects 0–3 months post-injury, n = 8) and “post-acute” (3 months−2 years post-concussion, n = 7). A TMS quality of study checklist rated studies from moderate to high in methodological quality; however, the risk of bias analysis found that the included studies were categorised as high risk of bias, particularly for a lack of allocation concealment and blinding of participants in the methodologies. A meta-analysis showed no differences in excitability measures, apart from a decreased motor threshold that was observed in the concussed group (SMD −0.28, 95% CI −0.51 to −0.04; P = 0.02) for the post-acute time frame. Conversely, all inhibitory measures showed differences between groups. Cortical silent period duration was found to be significantly increased in the acute (SMD 1.19, 95% CI 0.58–1.81; P < 0.001) and post-acute (SMD 0.55, 95% CI 0.12–0.98; P = 0.01) time frames. The SICI (SMD −1.15, 95% CI −1.95 to −0.34; P = 0.005) and LICI (SMD −1.95, 95% CI −3.04 to −0.85; P = 0.005) ratios were reduced, inferring increased inhibition, for the post-acute time frame. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that inhibitory pathways are affected in the acute period post-concussion. However, persistent alterations in cortical excitability remain, with increased intracortical inhibition. While TMS should be considered as a reliable technique to measure the functional integrity of the central nervous system, the high risk of bias and heterogeneity in data suggest that future studies should aim to incorporate standardised methodological techniques, particularly with threshold determination and stimulus intervals for paired-pulse measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7481389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74813892020-11-12 The Neurophysiological Responses of Concussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies Scott, Emily Kidgell, Dawson J. Frazer, Ashlyn K. Pearce, Alan J. Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated neurophysiological responses using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) following a concussion or sub-concussion. Methods: A systematic searching of relevant databases for peer-reviewed literature quantifying motor evoked potentials from TMS between 1999 and 2019 was performed. A meta-analysis quantified pooled data for measures including motor threshold, motor latency, and motor evoked potential amplitude and for inhibitory measures such as cortical silent period duration, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) ratios. Results: Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were arbitrarily classified into the groups, based on time post-concussion, “acute” (subjects 0–3 months post-injury, n = 8) and “post-acute” (3 months−2 years post-concussion, n = 7). A TMS quality of study checklist rated studies from moderate to high in methodological quality; however, the risk of bias analysis found that the included studies were categorised as high risk of bias, particularly for a lack of allocation concealment and blinding of participants in the methodologies. A meta-analysis showed no differences in excitability measures, apart from a decreased motor threshold that was observed in the concussed group (SMD −0.28, 95% CI −0.51 to −0.04; P = 0.02) for the post-acute time frame. Conversely, all inhibitory measures showed differences between groups. Cortical silent period duration was found to be significantly increased in the acute (SMD 1.19, 95% CI 0.58–1.81; P < 0.001) and post-acute (SMD 0.55, 95% CI 0.12–0.98; P = 0.01) time frames. The SICI (SMD −1.15, 95% CI −1.95 to −0.34; P = 0.005) and LICI (SMD −1.95, 95% CI −3.04 to −0.85; P = 0.005) ratios were reduced, inferring increased inhibition, for the post-acute time frame. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that inhibitory pathways are affected in the acute period post-concussion. However, persistent alterations in cortical excitability remain, with increased intracortical inhibition. While TMS should be considered as a reliable technique to measure the functional integrity of the central nervous system, the high risk of bias and heterogeneity in data suggest that future studies should aim to incorporate standardised methodological techniques, particularly with threshold determination and stimulus intervals for paired-pulse measures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7481389/ /pubmed/33192374 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00306 Text en Copyright © 2020 Scott, Kidgell, Frazer and Pearce. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Scott, Emily
Kidgell, Dawson J.
Frazer, Ashlyn K.
Pearce, Alan J.
The Neurophysiological Responses of Concussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
title The Neurophysiological Responses of Concussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
title_full The Neurophysiological Responses of Concussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
title_fullStr The Neurophysiological Responses of Concussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
title_full_unstemmed The Neurophysiological Responses of Concussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
title_short The Neurophysiological Responses of Concussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
title_sort neurophysiological responses of concussive impacts: a systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation studies
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192374
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00306
work_keys_str_mv AT scottemily theneurophysiologicalresponsesofconcussiveimpactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftranscranialmagneticstimulationstudies
AT kidgelldawsonj theneurophysiologicalresponsesofconcussiveimpactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftranscranialmagneticstimulationstudies
AT frazerashlynk theneurophysiologicalresponsesofconcussiveimpactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftranscranialmagneticstimulationstudies
AT pearcealanj theneurophysiologicalresponsesofconcussiveimpactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftranscranialmagneticstimulationstudies
AT scottemily neurophysiologicalresponsesofconcussiveimpactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftranscranialmagneticstimulationstudies
AT kidgelldawsonj neurophysiologicalresponsesofconcussiveimpactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftranscranialmagneticstimulationstudies
AT frazerashlynk neurophysiologicalresponsesofconcussiveimpactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftranscranialmagneticstimulationstudies
AT pearcealanj neurophysiologicalresponsesofconcussiveimpactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftranscranialmagneticstimulationstudies