Cargando…

The influence of different sample preparation on mechanical properties of human iliotibial tract

In the run-up to biomechanical testing, fresh human tissue samples are often frozen in order to inhibit initial decomposition processes and to achieve a temporal independence of tissue acquisition from biomechanical testing. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of fresh tis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Benjamin, Kurz, Sascha, Höch, Andreas, Schleifenbaum, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71790-5
_version_ 1783580678640631808
author Fischer, Benjamin
Kurz, Sascha
Höch, Andreas
Schleifenbaum, Stefan
author_facet Fischer, Benjamin
Kurz, Sascha
Höch, Andreas
Schleifenbaum, Stefan
author_sort Fischer, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description In the run-up to biomechanical testing, fresh human tissue samples are often frozen in order to inhibit initial decomposition processes and to achieve a temporal independence of tissue acquisition from biomechanical testing. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of fresh tissue samples of the human iliotibial tract (IT) to fresh-frozen samples taken from the same IT and those modified with different concentrations of Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) prior to freezing. All samples were partial plastinated and destructive tensile tests were conducted with a uniaxial tensile test setup. A plastination technique already established in the laboratory was modified to improve the clamping behaviour of the samples. Material failure was caused by a gradual rupture of the load-bearing collagen fibre bundles. Contrary to our expectations, no significant difference was found between the tensile strength of fresh and fresh frozen specimens. The addition of 1 wt% DMSO did not increase the tensile strength compared to fresh-frozen samples; an addition of 10 wt% DMSO even resulted in a decrease. Based on our findings, the use of simple fresh-frozen specimens to determine the tensile strength is viable; however fresh specimens should be used to generate a complete property profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7481782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74817822020-09-11 The influence of different sample preparation on mechanical properties of human iliotibial tract Fischer, Benjamin Kurz, Sascha Höch, Andreas Schleifenbaum, Stefan Sci Rep Article In the run-up to biomechanical testing, fresh human tissue samples are often frozen in order to inhibit initial decomposition processes and to achieve a temporal independence of tissue acquisition from biomechanical testing. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of fresh tissue samples of the human iliotibial tract (IT) to fresh-frozen samples taken from the same IT and those modified with different concentrations of Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) prior to freezing. All samples were partial plastinated and destructive tensile tests were conducted with a uniaxial tensile test setup. A plastination technique already established in the laboratory was modified to improve the clamping behaviour of the samples. Material failure was caused by a gradual rupture of the load-bearing collagen fibre bundles. Contrary to our expectations, no significant difference was found between the tensile strength of fresh and fresh frozen specimens. The addition of 1 wt% DMSO did not increase the tensile strength compared to fresh-frozen samples; an addition of 10 wt% DMSO even resulted in a decrease. Based on our findings, the use of simple fresh-frozen specimens to determine the tensile strength is viable; however fresh specimens should be used to generate a complete property profile. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7481782/ /pubmed/32908171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71790-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Fischer, Benjamin
Kurz, Sascha
Höch, Andreas
Schleifenbaum, Stefan
The influence of different sample preparation on mechanical properties of human iliotibial tract
title The influence of different sample preparation on mechanical properties of human iliotibial tract
title_full The influence of different sample preparation on mechanical properties of human iliotibial tract
title_fullStr The influence of different sample preparation on mechanical properties of human iliotibial tract
title_full_unstemmed The influence of different sample preparation on mechanical properties of human iliotibial tract
title_short The influence of different sample preparation on mechanical properties of human iliotibial tract
title_sort influence of different sample preparation on mechanical properties of human iliotibial tract
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71790-5
work_keys_str_mv AT fischerbenjamin theinfluenceofdifferentsamplepreparationonmechanicalpropertiesofhumaniliotibialtract
AT kurzsascha theinfluenceofdifferentsamplepreparationonmechanicalpropertiesofhumaniliotibialtract
AT hochandreas theinfluenceofdifferentsamplepreparationonmechanicalpropertiesofhumaniliotibialtract
AT schleifenbaumstefan theinfluenceofdifferentsamplepreparationonmechanicalpropertiesofhumaniliotibialtract
AT fischerbenjamin influenceofdifferentsamplepreparationonmechanicalpropertiesofhumaniliotibialtract
AT kurzsascha influenceofdifferentsamplepreparationonmechanicalpropertiesofhumaniliotibialtract
AT hochandreas influenceofdifferentsamplepreparationonmechanicalpropertiesofhumaniliotibialtract
AT schleifenbaumstefan influenceofdifferentsamplepreparationonmechanicalpropertiesofhumaniliotibialtract