Cargando…
Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity?
This study examined the contribution of temporal and spectral modulation sensitivity to discrimination of stimuli modulated in both the time and frequency domains. The spectrotemporally modulated stimuli contained spectral ripples that shifted systematically across frequency over time at a repetitio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32895024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520948385 |
_version_ | 1783580728985911296 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Ning Dixon, Susannah Zhu, Zhen Dong, Lixue Weiner, Marti |
author_facet | Zhou, Ning Dixon, Susannah Zhu, Zhen Dong, Lixue Weiner, Marti |
author_sort | Zhou, Ning |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examined the contribution of temporal and spectral modulation sensitivity to discrimination of stimuli modulated in both the time and frequency domains. The spectrotemporally modulated stimuli contained spectral ripples that shifted systematically across frequency over time at a repetition rate of 5 Hz. As the ripple density increased in the stimulus, modulation depth of the 5 Hz amplitude modulation (AM) reduced. Spectrotemporal modulation discrimination was compared with subjects’ ability to discriminate static spectral ripples and the ability to detect slow AM. The general pattern from both the cochlear implant (CI) and normal hearing groups showed that spectrotemporal modulation thresholds were correlated more strongly with AM detection than with static ripple discrimination. CI subjects’ spectrotemporal modulation thresholds were also highly correlated with speech recognition in noise, when partialing out static ripple discrimination, but the correlation was not significant when partialing out AM detection. The results indicated that temporal information was more heavily weighted in spectrotemporal modulation discrimination, and for CI subjects, it was AM sensitivity that drove the correlation between spectrotemporal modulation thresholds and speech recognition. The results suggest that for the rates tested here, temporal information processing may limit performance more than spectral information processing in both CI users and normal hearing listeners. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7482033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74820332020-09-17 Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity? Zhou, Ning Dixon, Susannah Zhu, Zhen Dong, Lixue Weiner, Marti Trends Hear Original Article This study examined the contribution of temporal and spectral modulation sensitivity to discrimination of stimuli modulated in both the time and frequency domains. The spectrotemporally modulated stimuli contained spectral ripples that shifted systematically across frequency over time at a repetition rate of 5 Hz. As the ripple density increased in the stimulus, modulation depth of the 5 Hz amplitude modulation (AM) reduced. Spectrotemporal modulation discrimination was compared with subjects’ ability to discriminate static spectral ripples and the ability to detect slow AM. The general pattern from both the cochlear implant (CI) and normal hearing groups showed that spectrotemporal modulation thresholds were correlated more strongly with AM detection than with static ripple discrimination. CI subjects’ spectrotemporal modulation thresholds were also highly correlated with speech recognition in noise, when partialing out static ripple discrimination, but the correlation was not significant when partialing out AM detection. The results indicated that temporal information was more heavily weighted in spectrotemporal modulation discrimination, and for CI subjects, it was AM sensitivity that drove the correlation between spectrotemporal modulation thresholds and speech recognition. The results suggest that for the rates tested here, temporal information processing may limit performance more than spectral information processing in both CI users and normal hearing listeners. SAGE Publications 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7482033/ /pubmed/32895024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520948385 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhou, Ning Dixon, Susannah Zhu, Zhen Dong, Lixue Weiner, Marti Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity? |
title | Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity? |
title_full | Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity? |
title_fullStr | Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity? |
title_full_unstemmed | Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity? |
title_short | Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity? |
title_sort | spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners: is the performance driven by temporal or spectral modulation sensitivity? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32895024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520948385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouning spectrotemporalmodulationsensitivityincochlearimplantandnormalhearinglistenersistheperformancedrivenbytemporalorspectralmodulationsensitivity AT dixonsusannah spectrotemporalmodulationsensitivityincochlearimplantandnormalhearinglistenersistheperformancedrivenbytemporalorspectralmodulationsensitivity AT zhuzhen spectrotemporalmodulationsensitivityincochlearimplantandnormalhearinglistenersistheperformancedrivenbytemporalorspectralmodulationsensitivity AT donglixue spectrotemporalmodulationsensitivityincochlearimplantandnormalhearinglistenersistheperformancedrivenbytemporalorspectralmodulationsensitivity AT weinermarti spectrotemporalmodulationsensitivityincochlearimplantandnormalhearinglistenersistheperformancedrivenbytemporalorspectralmodulationsensitivity |