Cargando…

Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013

This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From December 2014 to July 2017, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Numasaki, Hodaka, Teshima, Teruki, Okuda, Yasuo, Ogawa, Kazuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32648574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraa047
_version_ 1783580746608279552
author Numasaki, Hodaka
Teshima, Teruki
Okuda, Yasuo
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
author_facet Numasaki, Hodaka
Teshima, Teruki
Okuda, Yasuo
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
author_sort Numasaki, Hodaka
collection PubMed
description This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From December 2014 to July 2017, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013. Data were analyzed based on institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 216 000 and 257 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 862 452 cases with ~25.0% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 880), Gamma Knife (n = 45), (60)Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 23) and (192)Ir RALS (n = 128). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 675 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 785 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 494. There were 831 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 1130.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2214.6 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 196.6 FTE medical physicists, 183.8 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 856.7 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7482164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74821642020-09-14 Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013 Numasaki, Hodaka Teshima, Teruki Okuda, Yasuo Ogawa, Kazuhiko J Radiat Res Regular Paper This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From December 2014 to July 2017, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013. Data were analyzed based on institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 216 000 and 257 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 862 452 cases with ~25.0% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 880), Gamma Knife (n = 45), (60)Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 23) and (192)Ir RALS (n = 128). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 675 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 785 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 494. There were 831 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 1130.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2214.6 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 196.6 FTE medical physicists, 183.8 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 856.7 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2013. Oxford University Press 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7482164/ /pubmed/32648574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraa047 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regular Paper
Numasaki, Hodaka
Teshima, Teruki
Okuda, Yasuo
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013
title Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013
title_full Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013
title_fullStr Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013
title_full_unstemmed Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013
title_short Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013
title_sort japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013
topic Regular Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32648574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraa047
work_keys_str_mv AT numasakihodaka japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2013
AT teshimateruki japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2013
AT okudayasuo japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2013
AT ogawakazuhiko japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2013
AT japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2013