Cargando…

Comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial

We aimed to investigate whether gold marker implantation in the tissue surrounding the prostate could accurately monitor setup errors during external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. Thirty-eight patients had confirmed intermediate- or high-risk prostate can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaneda, Tomoya, Ohashi, Toshio, Hanada, Takashi, Takenaka, Koji, Nishimura, Shuichi, Sakayori, Masanori, Sutani, Shinya, Momma, Tetsuo, Shigematsu, Naoyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32808018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraa063
_version_ 1783580747533123584
author Kaneda, Tomoya
Ohashi, Toshio
Hanada, Takashi
Takenaka, Koji
Nishimura, Shuichi
Sakayori, Masanori
Sutani, Shinya
Momma, Tetsuo
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
author_facet Kaneda, Tomoya
Ohashi, Toshio
Hanada, Takashi
Takenaka, Koji
Nishimura, Shuichi
Sakayori, Masanori
Sutani, Shinya
Momma, Tetsuo
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
author_sort Kaneda, Tomoya
collection PubMed
description We aimed to investigate whether gold marker implantation in the tissue surrounding the prostate could accurately monitor setup errors during external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. Thirty-eight patients had confirmed intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer and received EBRT following LDR brachytherapy. In >175 computed tomography imaging sessions, the average values of the weekly setup error during EBRT to the prostate centroid at the time of gold marker matching in the surrounding tissue of the prostate and pelvic bone matching were measured and then compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Gold marker matching in the surrounding tissue of the prostate estimated setup errors better than those estimated by bone matching (3D displacement = 2.7 ± 2.0 vs 3.8 ± 2.6 mm, P < 0.01). Overall, the standard deviation of systematic (Σ) and random (σ) setup error was lower with gold marker matching than with bone matching (3D displacement = 1.8 and 1.1 mm vs 2.1 and 1.6 mm, respectively). With gold marker matching, the setup error of the position of the prostate centroid was smaller, and the optimal setup margin was lower than that with bone matching (2Σ + 0.7σ and 2.5Σ + 0.7σ of 3D displacement = 4.3 and 5.2 mm vs 5.3 and 6.4 mm, respectively). This high-precision radiotherapy approach placing gold markers in the surrounding tissue of the prostate can allow more accurate setup during EBRT following LDR brachytherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7482168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74821682020-09-14 Comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial Kaneda, Tomoya Ohashi, Toshio Hanada, Takashi Takenaka, Koji Nishimura, Shuichi Sakayori, Masanori Sutani, Shinya Momma, Tetsuo Shigematsu, Naoyuki J Radiat Res Regular Paper We aimed to investigate whether gold marker implantation in the tissue surrounding the prostate could accurately monitor setup errors during external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. Thirty-eight patients had confirmed intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer and received EBRT following LDR brachytherapy. In >175 computed tomography imaging sessions, the average values of the weekly setup error during EBRT to the prostate centroid at the time of gold marker matching in the surrounding tissue of the prostate and pelvic bone matching were measured and then compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Gold marker matching in the surrounding tissue of the prostate estimated setup errors better than those estimated by bone matching (3D displacement = 2.7 ± 2.0 vs 3.8 ± 2.6 mm, P < 0.01). Overall, the standard deviation of systematic (Σ) and random (σ) setup error was lower with gold marker matching than with bone matching (3D displacement = 1.8 and 1.1 mm vs 2.1 and 1.6 mm, respectively). With gold marker matching, the setup error of the position of the prostate centroid was smaller, and the optimal setup margin was lower than that with bone matching (2Σ + 0.7σ and 2.5Σ + 0.7σ of 3D displacement = 4.3 and 5.2 mm vs 5.3 and 6.4 mm, respectively). This high-precision radiotherapy approach placing gold markers in the surrounding tissue of the prostate can allow more accurate setup during EBRT following LDR brachytherapy. Oxford University Press 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7482168/ /pubmed/32808018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraa063 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Regular Paper
Kaneda, Tomoya
Ohashi, Toshio
Hanada, Takashi
Takenaka, Koji
Nishimura, Shuichi
Sakayori, Masanori
Sutani, Shinya
Momma, Tetsuo
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
Comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial
title Comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial
title_full Comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial
title_short Comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial
title_sort comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial
topic Regular Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32808018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraa063
work_keys_str_mv AT kanedatomoya comparisonofprostateverificationwithimplantedgoldmarkersintissuesurroundingtheprostateandpelvicbonyanatomyforexternalbeamradiationtherapyfollowinglowdoseratebrachytherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT ohashitoshio comparisonofprostateverificationwithimplantedgoldmarkersintissuesurroundingtheprostateandpelvicbonyanatomyforexternalbeamradiationtherapyfollowinglowdoseratebrachytherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT hanadatakashi comparisonofprostateverificationwithimplantedgoldmarkersintissuesurroundingtheprostateandpelvicbonyanatomyforexternalbeamradiationtherapyfollowinglowdoseratebrachytherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT takenakakoji comparisonofprostateverificationwithimplantedgoldmarkersintissuesurroundingtheprostateandpelvicbonyanatomyforexternalbeamradiationtherapyfollowinglowdoseratebrachytherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT nishimurashuichi comparisonofprostateverificationwithimplantedgoldmarkersintissuesurroundingtheprostateandpelvicbonyanatomyforexternalbeamradiationtherapyfollowinglowdoseratebrachytherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT sakayorimasanori comparisonofprostateverificationwithimplantedgoldmarkersintissuesurroundingtheprostateandpelvicbonyanatomyforexternalbeamradiationtherapyfollowinglowdoseratebrachytherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT sutanishinya comparisonofprostateverificationwithimplantedgoldmarkersintissuesurroundingtheprostateandpelvicbonyanatomyforexternalbeamradiationtherapyfollowinglowdoseratebrachytherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT mommatetsuo comparisonofprostateverificationwithimplantedgoldmarkersintissuesurroundingtheprostateandpelvicbonyanatomyforexternalbeamradiationtherapyfollowinglowdoseratebrachytherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT shigematsunaoyuki comparisonofprostateverificationwithimplantedgoldmarkersintissuesurroundingtheprostateandpelvicbonyanatomyforexternalbeamradiationtherapyfollowinglowdoseratebrachytherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrial