Cargando…

Different Effect Mechanisms of Supercritical CO(2) on the Shale Microscopic Structure

[Image: see text] To better understand how supercritical carbon dioxide (CO(2)) enhances shale gas production, it is necessary to study the interaction of supercritical CO(2) with shale and its impact on shale microstructure. The different mechanisms by which supercritical CO(2) changes the shale po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Yiyu, Zhou, Jiankun, Li, Honglian, Chen, Xiayu, Tang, Jiren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03200
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] To better understand how supercritical carbon dioxide (CO(2)) enhances shale gas production, it is necessary to study the interaction of supercritical CO(2) with shale and its impact on shale microstructure. The different mechanisms by which supercritical CO(2) changes the shale pore structure were studied by X-ray diffraction analyses, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and low-pressure nitrogen gas adsorption tests on shale samples before and after treatment with different pressures and gases (CO(2) and Ar). The results showed that after treatment with CO(2), the mineral content of shale changed significantly, and in particular, the proportions of calcite and dolomite decreased. The mineral content of shale changed the most after treatment with supercritical CO(2), and the microscopic pores were most observable by SEM. In a gaseous CO(2) environment, the effect of CO(2) adsorption on shale pores is greater than the effects of gas pressure and dissolution reactions. However, in a supercritical CO(2) environment, the changes in shale pore structures are mainly controlled by extraction and dissolution reactions. When shale is exposed to supercritical CO(2), the fractal dimensions of adsorption pores and seepage pores decrease, indicating that the specific surface area and roughness of adsorption pores decrease. This implies that the adsorption capacity decreases, and that the complexity of the seepage pores declines, which is conducive for gas migration.